한글박물관본 『명주기봉』의 서민층 향유양상 연구
Study on the Aspect of Enjoyment by the Common People on Myeongjukibong, the Hangeul Museum Version
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After reviewing manuscripts and collections of the Hangeul Museum, we were able to observe the situation that Myeongjukibong had been read by the common people, chiefly by women, from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century. And this expansion of the reading public had set off differences on the method of description of novels. The Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong has many condensed parts and easily described Sino-Korean words differently with the Nakseonjae version. This aspect is important not only for the study on Myeongjukibong itself, but also for the entire study of river novels. Although the fact that Myeongjukibong had been read from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century was known but we could not clearly identify the specific aspects, and moreover to ascertain that it was read by the common people was impossible. Of course we were able to see Myeongjukibong in the list of rental books and know it had been read widely by public, nevertheless, these facts could not prove that this piece of work had been enjoyed by the common people. The different editions of Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong have important meaning in allowing to confirm that the novel had been widely read by the common people from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century. On the other hand, the aspect of enjoyment on the Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong are crucial for viewing the history of enjoyment on th entire river novels. And the Hangeul Museum versions show clearly that the class of readers of river novels spread down as the future generations go. Especially they are meaningful in a regard they ascertain that women were the main readers in lower class as it went in upper class.
Abstract
After reviewing manuscripts and collections of the Hangeul Museum, we were able to observe the situation that Myeongjukibong had been read by the common people, chiefly by women, from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century. And this expansion of the reading public had set off differences on the method of description of novels. The Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong has many condensed parts and easily described Sino-Korean words differently with the Nakseonjae version. This aspect is important not only for the study on Myeongjukibong itself, but also for the entire study of river novels. Although the fact that Myeongjukibong had been read from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century was known but we could not clearly identify the specific aspects, and moreover to ascertain that it was read by the common people was impossible. Of course we were able to see Myeongjukibong in the list of rental books and know it had been read widely by public, nevertheless, these facts could not prove that this piece of work had been enjoyed by the common people. The different editions of Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong have important meaning in allowing to confirm that the novel had been widely read by the common people from the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century. On the other hand, the aspect of enjoyment on the Hangeul Museum version Myeongjukibong are crucial for viewing the history of enjoyment on th entire river novels. And the Hangeul Museum versions show clearly that the class of readers of river novels spread down as the future generations go. Especially they are meaningful in a regard they ascertain that women were the main readers in lower class as it went in upper class.
참고문헌 (28)
- 심경호, "낙선재본 소설의 선행본에 관한 일고찰: 온양 정씨 필사본 『옥원재합기연』과 낙선재본 『옥원중회연』의 관계를 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 38 (1990)
- 김종철, "고소설의 저작과 전파" (1994), 아세아문화사
- 조태억, "겸재집(謙齋集) 권42, 언서서주연의발(諺書西周演義跋)", ~
- 이상택, "『창난호연 연작』의 텍스트 교감학", 고전문학연구, 15 (1999)
- 한길연, "대하소설의 의식성향과 향유층위에 관한 연구 : <창란호연록>·<옥원재합기연>·<완월회맹연>을 중심으로", 박사, 국문학, pp.2005
- 정병설, "세책소설 연구의 쟁점과 방향", 국문학연구, 10 (2003)
- 정명기, "세책본소설에 대한 새 자료의 성격 연구 -諺文厚生錄 소재 목록을 중심으로-", 고소설연구, (19), pp.227~254 (2005), 한국고소설학회
- 정명기, "세책본소설의 유통양상-동양문고 소장 세책본소설에 나타난 세책장부를 중심으로-", 고소설연구, (16), pp.3~100 (2003), 한국고소설학회
- 최수현, "<명주기봉> 이본 연구-고대본 <명주기봉>을 중심으로-", 韓國古典硏究, (32), pp.569~602 (2015), 한국고전연구학회
- 이지하, "현씨양웅쌍린기 연작 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1992
- 고은임, "「명주기봉」의 애정 형상 연구", 석사, 국문학, pp.2010
- 송성욱, "『명주기봉』에 나타난 규방에 대한 관심", 고전문학연구, 7 (1992)
- 최수현, "<명주기봉>에 나타난 부부 화합의 조건 - 현천린 부부를 중심으로", 韓國古典硏究, (34), pp.141~172 (2016), 한국고전연구학회[DOI]
- 韓吉娟, "大河小說의 능동적 보조인물 연구 : 『임화정연』, 『화정선행록』, 『현씨양웅쌍린기』 연작을 중심으로", 석사, 국문학, pp.1997
- 한길연, "대하소설의 ‘일상 서사’의 미학 - 일상과 탈일상의 줄타기", 국문학연구, (14), pp.125~149 (2006), 국문학회
- 김동욱, "장암지헌영선생화갑기념논총" (1971), 호서문화사
- 정명기, "세책 필사본 고소설'에 대한 서설적 이해 -總量·刊所(刊記)·流通樣相을 중심으로-", 고소설연구, (12), pp.445~180 (2001), 한국고소설학회
- 岡倉由三郎, "朝鮮の文學", 철학잡지, 74, pp.844~845 (1984)
- 모리스 꾸랑, "한국서지", pp.3~4 (1994), 일조각
- 최남선, "육당최남선전집 9" (1974), 현암사
- 鄭炳說, "玩月會盟宴 硏究", 박사, 국문학, pp.1997
- 이지영, "조선후기 대하소설에 나타난 일상-<완월회맹연>을 중심으로", 국문학연구, (13), pp.33~56 (2005), 국문학회
- 이민희, "고소설에 나타난 놀이의 서사적 성격과 놀이 문화", 열상고전연구, (30), pp.261~300 (2009), 열상고전연구회
- 서정민, "조선후기 한글대하소설 속 여성의 시작(詩作) 양상과 그 소통 -<소현성록>, <유씨삼대록>, <명행정의록>을 대상으로", 여성문학연구, 24(24), pp.121~145 (2010), 한국여성문학학회
- 정선희, "고전소설 속 여성 생활 문화의 교육적 활용 방안 연구 - 국문장편소설을 중심으로", 韓國古典硏究, (22), pp.83~121 (2010), 한국고전연구학회
- 한길연, "<유씨삼대록>의 예법(禮法)에 관한 연구", 한국학연구, (34), pp.173~215 (2010), 한국학연구소
- 차충환, "고소설에 나타난 놀이문화 연구- <옥루몽>과 <옥선몽>을 중심으로 -", 공연문화연구, (24), pp.373~404 (2012), 한국공연문화학회
- 정병설, "조선시대 소설의 생산과 유통", pp.219~220 (2016), 서울대학교출판문화원