18세기 경화사족의 소설 향유
Noble of Seoul in 18th century and Reading novel.
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is on the relation between reading novel and noble of Seoul in 18th century. For this purpose, I analyzed two lists of novels. One was written by Yun-Dukhee(尹德熙) and the other by Prince Sado(思悼世子). Also I surveyed the diary of Yu-Manjoo(兪晩柱). These data say that noblemen of Seoul in 18th century enjoyed chinese novels and in the chinese novels the proportion of human nature novels increased in late 18th century. To trace the reading novels of noblewomen, I analyzed the list of novel in the back of Okwonjaehapkiyeon(옥원재합기연), the Korean novel, too. Different from noblemen, noblewomen did not enjoyed Chinese human nature novels, but enjoyed Chinese historical novels, and they preferred for korean novel to translated Chinese novels. Some scholars supposed that in 18th century noblewomen got the novles from rental shop, but I think that the customers of book rental shop were the lower class women, and noblewomen got the novels in their own family. There was imbalance between reading novel and writing novel of noblemen. They were the enthusiastic novel readers, but they did not have the desire for writing. I supposed it was because of their abundant life. They had the possibility in real life, so had no desire to realize in fiction. On the other hand, women of upper class are thought to be the writer of Korean novel. In the culture of reading Korean novel, the reader was not separated from writer, So the readers could write stories more easily.
Abstract
This study is on the relation between reading novel and noble of Seoul in 18th century. For this purpose, I analyzed two lists of novels. One was written by Yun-Dukhee(尹德熙) and the other by Prince Sado(思悼世子). Also I surveyed the diary of Yu-Manjoo(兪晩柱). These data say that noblemen of Seoul in 18th century enjoyed chinese novels and in the chinese novels the proportion of human nature novels increased in late 18th century. To trace the reading novels of noblewomen, I analyzed the list of novel in the back of Okwonjaehapkiyeon(옥원재합기연), the Korean novel, too. Different from noblemen, noblewomen did not enjoyed Chinese human nature novels, but enjoyed Chinese historical novels, and they preferred for korean novel to translated Chinese novels. Some scholars supposed that in 18th century noblewomen got the novles from rental shop, but I think that the customers of book rental shop were the lower class women, and noblewomen got the novels in their own family. There was imbalance between reading novel and writing novel of noblemen. They were the enthusiastic novel readers, but they did not have the desire for writing. I supposed it was because of their abundant life. They had the possibility in real life, so had no desire to realize in fiction. On the other hand, women of upper class are thought to be the writer of Korean novel. In the culture of reading Korean novel, the reader was not separated from writer, So the readers could write stories more easily.
참고문헌 (42)
- "션부인가전", 서울대학교 규장각 소장
- "송남잡지" (1986), 아세아문화사
- "승정원일기"[URL]
- "조선왕조실록"[URL]
- "한국문집총간"[URL]
- 강명관, "조선시대 문학예술의 생성공간" (1999), 소명출판
- 고동환, "조선시대 서울도시사" (2007), 태학사
- 김경미, "이상황의 소설의식-배척과 옹호의 길항", 한국고전연구, 4, pp.157~180 (1998), 한국고전연구학회
- 김경미, "淫詞小說의 수용과 19세기 한문소설의 변화", 고전문학연구, (25), pp.331~360 (2004), 한국고전문학회
- 김영진, "조선후기의 명청 소품 수용과 소품문의 전개양상", 박사, pp.2004
- 김준형, "18세기 도시의 발달과 소설 향유의 면모", 고소설연구, (26), pp.91~118 (2008), 한국고소설학회
- 류탁일, "한국고소설비평자료집성" (1994), 아세아문화사
- 모리스 쿠랑, "한국서지" (2005), 일조각
- 박영희, "장편가문소설의 향유집단. in: 문학과 사회집단" (1995), 집문당
- 박재연, "완산 이씨 『중국소설회모본』에 대하여. in: 석헌정규복박사 고희기념논총" (1996)
- 박재연, "윤덕희의 소설경람자", 문헌과 해석, (여름), pp.207~216 (2002), 문헌과해석사
- 심경호, "낙선재본 소설의 선행본에 관한 일고찰", 정신문화연구, 통권 : 38, pp.169~188 (1990)
- 유봉학, "조선후기 학계와 지식인" (1998), 신구문화사
- 윤세순, "16세기, 중국소설의 국내유입과 향유 양상", 민족문학사연구, 25, pp.134~161 (2004), 민족문학사학회
- 尹世旬, "17세기, 소설류의 유행양상", 동방한문학, (31), pp.403~433 (2006), 동방한문학회
- 이기대, "19세기 한문장편소설 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이민희, "16-19세기 서적중개상과 소설˙서적 유통 관계 연구" (2007), 역락
- 이지영, "한글 필사본에 나타난 한글 筆寫의 문화적 맥락", 한국고전여성문학연구, (17), pp.273~308 (2008), 한국고전여성문학회
- 이혜순, "수호전 판본고", 중국학보, 14, pp.1~24 (1973), 한국중국학회
- 임형택, "17세기 규방소설의 성림과 <창선감의록>", 동방학지, 57, pp.103~176 (1988), 연세대 국학자료원
- 정길수, "한국 고전장편소설의 형성과정" (2005), 돌베개
- 정병설, "<옥교리>와 동아시아 어문교류. in: 옥교리" (2003), 선문대학교 중한번역문헌연구소
- 정병설, "사도세자가 명해서 만든 화첩:『중국소설회모본』", 문헌과 해석, 47, pp.126~135 (2009)
- 정병설, "조선후기 한글소설의 성장과 유통 - 세책과 방각을 중심으로 -", 진단학보, (100), pp.263~297 (2005), 진단학회
- 정병설, "완월회맹연 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 정선희, "朝鮮後期 文人들의 金聖嘆 評批本에 대한 讀書 談論 硏究", 동방학지, (129), pp.305~345 (2005), 국학연구원
- 정양완, "영세보장" (1998), 태학사
- 조관희, "수호전인론", 중어중문학, 9, pp.139~162 (1987), 한국중어중문학회
- 조숙자, "<第六才子書西廂記> 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 최자경, "유만주의 소설관", 석사, pp.2000
- 최형섭, "출판문화의 보급과 텍스트, 저자, 독자, 그리고 독서 관습:경전 읽기와 소설 읽기의 비교 분석을 통하여", 중국소설논총, (29), pp.183~207 (2009), 한국중국소설학회
- 최호석, "玉所 權燮의 小說 漢譯과 그 意味", 고소설연구, (11), pp.237~264 (2001), 한국고소설학회
- 최호석, "옥린몽의 작가와 작품세계" (2004), 다운샘
- 한매, "조선후기 김성탄 문학비평의 수용양상 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 벤저민 엘먼, "성리학에서 고증학으로" (2004), 예문서원
- 오오키 야스시, "명말 강남의 출판문화" (2007), 소명
- 조선후기 소설독자 연구, "大谷森繁", 고려대 민족문화연구소, 75~ (1985)