省齋 柳重敎의 禮 실천과 「方喪儀節」
The Ritual Practice of SungJae LyuJoongkyo and Bangsang-uijeol
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ritual-related writings of LyuJuoongkyo were centered on the content for practice. He wrote the manual to practice rituals in Seosa, after the seowon was removed. After moved to gajung, village of Gohung Lyu Clan, on the occasion of Yongnammaninso(嶺南萬人疏), he attempted to edify his kin and local community through the manual of clan. However, for the realization of ritualistic social system, he moved to jangdam, which is far away from Seoul, and paid attention to the ritualistic edification of local community centered on the Gye. As a Confucian scholar of the Sadaebu, he promised to keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals to the king, but when he was not accepted, he tried to reorganize the rituals centering on his family, his clan, his school and his village and practice Confucianism. He tried to defeat the savage and keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals by adhering to Confucian righteousness through the practice of ritual. To the ritualistic edification, First, the Seosa was established as the center of the ritualistic social system. Second, the expansion of the ritualistic social system from the relative community to the local community was progressed. Bangsang-uijeol of LyuJoongkyo was the manual of the rituals of bureaucrats and people during the national funeral, emphasizing the status of the sajok in the village. First, it was well revealed as a manual that was used for practice. It was composed to convenient to refer about national funeral, through the method for constituting the process and supplementing the specific content. In addition, various ritual theories were reviewed through Yeuiryujip, Garyejunghae that compiled the ritual study in chosun and a clear guide for the practice was presented based on his own judgment. Next, it supplemented the rites in the local village during the national funeral and defined the differential status of the people of the local village. Sajok showed a discriminatory status in a way that wore mourning cloths like a bureaucrats and cried in a different position from people. The national funeral became an important opportunity to establish the identity of Sajok, the subject of ritual edification. For LyuJoongkyo, who tried to overcome the internal and external crisis through the ritual edification of the local village, the superior status and role of Sajok would have been the basis for the practice of the ritualistic social system. These attempts are to keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals through ritualistic social system, and it could be said that it was another way of practicing for Wijeongcheoksa ideloogy. After his death, in the situation which the king was threatened by foreign powers, Hwaseo-school tried to practice Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals through the Righteous Army Movement, and his disciples and descendants participated in the Movement. In this respect, his practice of ritualistic social system could be told have achieved results.
Abstract
Ritual-related writings of LyuJuoongkyo were centered on the content for practice. He wrote the manual to practice rituals in Seosa, after the seowon was removed. After moved to gajung, village of Gohung Lyu Clan, on the occasion of Yongnammaninso(嶺南萬人疏), he attempted to edify his kin and local community through the manual of clan. However, for the realization of ritualistic social system, he moved to jangdam, which is far away from Seoul, and paid attention to the ritualistic edification of local community centered on the Gye. As a Confucian scholar of the Sadaebu, he promised to keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals to the king, but when he was not accepted, he tried to reorganize the rituals centering on his family, his clan, his school and his village and practice Confucianism. He tried to defeat the savage and keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals by adhering to Confucian righteousness through the practice of ritual. To the ritualistic edification, First, the Seosa was established as the center of the ritualistic social system. Second, the expansion of the ritualistic social system from the relative community to the local community was progressed. Bangsang-uijeol of LyuJoongkyo was the manual of the rituals of bureaucrats and people during the national funeral, emphasizing the status of the sajok in the village. First, it was well revealed as a manual that was used for practice. It was composed to convenient to refer about national funeral, through the method for constituting the process and supplementing the specific content. In addition, various ritual theories were reviewed through Yeuiryujip, Garyejunghae that compiled the ritual study in chosun and a clear guide for the practice was presented based on his own judgment. Next, it supplemented the rites in the local village during the national funeral and defined the differential status of the people of the local village. Sajok showed a discriminatory status in a way that wore mourning cloths like a bureaucrats and cried in a different position from people. The national funeral became an important opportunity to establish the identity of Sajok, the subject of ritual edification. For LyuJoongkyo, who tried to overcome the internal and external crisis through the ritual edification of the local village, the superior status and role of Sajok would have been the basis for the practice of the ritualistic social system. These attempts are to keep Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals through ritualistic social system, and it could be said that it was another way of practicing for Wijeongcheoksa ideloogy. After his death, in the situation which the king was threatened by foreign powers, Hwaseo-school tried to practice Justice of the Spring and Autumn Annals through the Righteous Army Movement, and his disciples and descendants participated in the Movement. In this respect, his practice of ritualistic social system could be told have achieved results.
참고문헌 (35)
- 오영섭, "화서학파의 사상과 민족운동" (1999), 국학자료원
- 이재석, "성재 유중교의 척사사상", 지역문화연구, 8 (2009)
- 하영휘, "柳重敎(1821~1893)의 춘추대의, 위정척사, 중화, 소중화", 민족문학사연구, (60), pp.163~189 (2016), 민족문학사연구소
- 김근호, "화서학파 심설논쟁의 전개과정과 철학적 문제의식", 율곡학연구, 27, pp.149~177 (2013), (사)율곡학회
- 이상익, "省齋 柳重敎의 經學과 經世論", 태동고전연구, 27, pp.47~75 (2011), 태동고전연구소
- 송기중, "壬戌民亂期 省齋 柳重敎의 三政論", 역사와 담론, (65), pp.81~110 (2013), 호서사학회
- 구완회, "省齋 柳重敎의 강학과 문인집단의 확대-화서학파의 四郡지역 전파와 관련하여-", 역사교육논집, (44), pp.279~313 (2010), 역사교육학회
- 김대식, "화서학파의 문인교육 연구", 박사, 교육학, pp.2007
- 송지원, "19세기 유학자 유중교의 樂論", 한국음악연구, 28 (2000)
- 금장태, "성재 유중교(省齋 柳重敎)의 음악론(樂論)", 종교와 문화, (13), pp.173~210 (2007), 종교문제연구소
- 임란경, "성재 유중교의 악론과 실천", 박사, pp.2018
- 정길연, "18~19세기 畿湖 禮說 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 조창규, "舊韓末과 日帝强占期 禮書 刊行의傾向과 意味 硏究", 동양한문학연구, 40(40), pp.245~264 (2015), 동양한문학회[DOI]
- "省齋集", ~
- 정길연, "艮齋 田愚의 師服說의 淵源과 意義", 인문학논총, 30, pp.169~199 (2012), 인문과학연구소
- 김윤정, "18세기 사복師服의 성격과 실제 ― 양응수의 「축장일기」를 중심으로", 국학연구, (23), pp.465~498 (2013), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- "栗谷全書 권16, 社倉契約束", ~
- 구완회, "韓末의 堤川義兵: 湖左義陣 硏究", pp.58~61 (1997), 집문당
- 김문식, "茶山 丁若鏞의 鄕禮 이해", 한국실학연구, (31), pp.281~316 (2016), 한국실학학회
- "祭禮通攷服制總要", ~
- 박종천, "조선 후기 성호학파의 입후설(立後說)과 친족의식", 민족문화연구, (65), pp.249~288 (2014), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- 김현수, "17世紀 鄕村敎化論과 鄕禮 認識 - 李惟泰, 尹鑴, 朴世采를 中心으로-", 동양고전연구, (39), pp.187~208 (2010), 동양고전학회
- 박종천, "19-20C 청도 밀양박씨의 향약과 계", 종교와 문화, (34), pp.105~137 (2018), 종교문제연구소
- "禮記集說", ~
- 장동우, "朝鮮時代 『家禮』 硏究의 進展", 태동고전연구, 31, pp.209~225 (2013), 태동고전연구소
- "常變通攷", ~
- "國朝喪禮補編 권1, 戒令", ~
- "渼湖集 권4, 書․答宋晦可", ~
- "櫟泉集 권6, 書․答渼湖金兄 【丁丑】", ~
- "日省錄"
- 김윤정, "조선후기 王朝禮와 私家禮의 변주 ―國恤 중 사가례 논의를 중심으로―", 민족문화연구, (79), pp.165~194 (2018), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- "국조상례보편", ~
- "家禮增解 권12, 喪禮八․【備要】 吉祭", ~
- "鹿門集 권6, 答朴永叔", ~
- "近齋集 권6, 與三山齋金公", ~
