본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

星湖 李瀷의 國恤 중 喪·祭禮 예론과 실천

Seongho Lee Ik’s Theory of Ritual and Practice about Funeral and worship during the National Funeral

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Seongho Lee Ik aimed at rituals that were appropriate for ancient rites and circumstance, centering on the difference of righteousness. When the mourning system of people was decided to be chamchoi(斬衰) 3years on the basis of ZhuXi’s opinion on mourning dresses of sovereign and subject on the national funeral of Sukjong in 1720, he emphasized the need for a differential system of the commoners(庶人). He argued that in the case of the commoners who does not have a office should wear jachoi(齊衰) 3months according to YiLi(儀禮), on the basis of ZhuXi’s opinion on mourning dresses of sovereign and subject. Since there is a difference in the righteousness with the monarch depending on the presence or absence of the office, all the predecessors, Sangwon and Jinsa should wear jachoi 3months.His argument was in line with the practice of rituals that match the status revealed in Seongho’s Rites and contrary to the general consciousness of restoring the ancient rites on the national funeral of Sukjong. He interpreted ‘gwasibuche(過時不除)’ in Zengzi Ask newly and explained the meaning of the ritual in the balance of the public(公) and the private(私). He regarded ‘si(時)’ as the season and understood that it allowed dressing and taking off of mourning costume after jolgok(卒哭) not three years. The officials placed importance on the righteousness with the king, so the public took precedence over the private. Nevertheless, what started jolgok was recognized as the public accepting the private without overpowering the private, He emphasized the difference between the circumstance of chosun and the original meaning of the ancient rites. He insisted that the officials of chosun was not necessary to follow the Zengzi Ask because they were the same as the commoners in the righteousness. He presented his example while discussing the practice of the funeral and worship in the national funeral. First, in the case of the funeral, it was judged that the distinction according to the presence or absence of the office was the principle of the Zengzi Ask which is ancient rites, and focused on explaining the ritual of the commoners without office. He explained that the commoners could held the ritual of funeral such as chosukgeon(朝夕奠) and sangje(祥祭) before jolgok of the national funeral. He also insisted that the officials who were the same as the commoners in the righteousness should follow the ritual of the commoners. This recognition was different from the theory of rites in Ki-Ho School which was recognized as the national institutions. In the case of the worship, he decided to implement the system in principle, which was to divide auspicious or ominous rather than by different positions. Therefore, before jolgok of the national funeral, kije(忌祭) which was considered to be part of the funeral could be done briefly but myoje(墓祭) and the holiday worship which were considered as auspicious ceremony could not be held. He had preserved the preaching of Lee Hwang, but unlike Lee Hwang’s preaching, he emphasized the principle of auspicious or ominous by prohibiting myoje and the holiday worship.

Abstract

Seongho Lee Ik aimed at rituals that were appropriate for ancient rites and circumstance, centering on the difference of righteousness. When the mourning system of people was decided to be chamchoi(斬衰) 3years on the basis of ZhuXi’s opinion on mourning dresses of sovereign and subject on the national funeral of Sukjong in 1720, he emphasized the need for a differential system of the commoners(庶人). He argued that in the case of the commoners who does not have a office should wear jachoi(齊衰) 3months according to YiLi(儀禮), on the basis of ZhuXi’s opinion on mourning dresses of sovereign and subject. Since there is a difference in the righteousness with the monarch depending on the presence or absence of the office, all the predecessors, Sangwon and Jinsa should wear jachoi 3months.His argument was in line with the practice of rituals that match the status revealed in Seongho’s Rites and contrary to the general consciousness of restoring the ancient rites on the national funeral of Sukjong. He interpreted ‘gwasibuche(過時不除)’ in Zengzi Ask newly and explained the meaning of the ritual in the balance of the public(公) and the private(私). He regarded ‘si(時)’ as the season and understood that it allowed dressing and taking off of mourning costume after jolgok(卒哭) not three years. The officials placed importance on the righteousness with the king, so the public took precedence over the private. Nevertheless, what started jolgok was recognized as the public accepting the private without overpowering the private, He emphasized the difference between the circumstance of chosun and the original meaning of the ancient rites. He insisted that the officials of chosun was not necessary to follow the Zengzi Ask because they were the same as the commoners in the righteousness. He presented his example while discussing the practice of the funeral and worship in the national funeral. First, in the case of the funeral, it was judged that the distinction according to the presence or absence of the office was the principle of the Zengzi Ask which is ancient rites, and focused on explaining the ritual of the commoners without office. He explained that the commoners could held the ritual of funeral such as chosukgeon(朝夕奠) and sangje(祥祭) before jolgok of the national funeral. He also insisted that the officials who were the same as the commoners in the righteousness should follow the ritual of the commoners. This recognition was different from the theory of rites in Ki-Ho School which was recognized as the national institutions. In the case of the worship, he decided to implement the system in principle, which was to divide auspicious or ominous rather than by different positions. Therefore, before jolgok of the national funeral, kije(忌祭) which was considered to be part of the funeral could be done briefly but myoje(墓祭) and the holiday worship which were considered as auspicious ceremony could not be held. He had preserved the preaching of Lee Hwang, but unlike Lee Hwang’s preaching, he emphasized the principle of auspicious or ominous by prohibiting myoje and the holiday worship.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "숙종실록", ~
  2. "退溪集", ~
  3. "國朝五禮儀", ~
  4. "星湖全集", ~
  5. 배상현, "星湖 李瀷의 禮學思想", 태동고전연구, 10 (1993)
  6. 이영춘, "星湖의 禮學과 己亥服制 禮論", 한국사연구 (1999)
  7. 이봉규, "실학의 예론 - 성호학파의 예론을 중심으로 -", 한국사상사학, (24), pp.103~134 (2005), 한국사상사학회
  8. 김남이, "18세기 喪ㆍ祭禮 실천과 宗統의 이상 - 星湖 李瀷의 承重ㆍ立後 논의를 중심으로", 동양고전연구, (35), pp.387~414 (2009), 동양고전학회
  9. 김종석, "星湖 李瀷에 있어서 退溪 禮學의 繼承과 變容", 동아인문학, 1(10), pp.517~552 (2006), 동아인문학회
  10. 박종천, "퇴계 예학과 근기실학자의 예학 ― 퇴계退溪‧성호星湖‧다산茶山을 중심으로", 국학연구, (21), pp.105~138 (2012), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
  11. 전성건, "星湖學派의 禮學과 茶山禮學의 定位- 『家禮』이해를 중심으로 -", 한국실학연구, (24), pp.147~193 (2012), 한국실학학회
  12. 김정민, "星湖 李瀷의 禮思想과 實踐의 實例: 『星湖先生禮式』 所在 冠婚禮의 境遇", 동양예학, 16, pp.298~ (2007)
  13. 박종천, "『계암일록』에 나타난 17세기 예안현 사족의 의례생활", 국학연구, (24), pp.261~309 (2014), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
  14. 김윤정, "조선후기 王朝禮와 私家禮의 변주 ―國恤 중 사가례 논의를 중심으로―", 민족문화연구, (79), pp.165~194 (2018), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
  15. 김윤정, "조선후기 고례古禮와 국제國制의 교차 — 국휼國恤 중 사상私喪 논의를 중심으로", 국학연구, (36), pp.339~372 (2018), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
  16. 김종석, "星湖 李瀷의 性理說에 있어서 '公’ 齡念의 意味와 機能", 국학연구, (창간) (2002)
  17. 김선희, "이념의 공(公)에서 실행의 사(私)로: 공사(公私) 관점에서 본 성호 이익의 사회 개혁론", 한국사상사학, (45), pp.339~371 (2013), 한국사상사학회
  18. 이원택, "현종대의 복제논쟁과 공사의리에 관한 연구", 박사, 정치학, pp.2000
  19. 안희재, "조선시대 국상의례 연구 : 국왕국장을 중심으로", 박사, 한국사, pp.2010
  20. 이봉규, "喪禮 爭點을 통해 본 『國朝喪禮補編』의 志向」 - 「古今喪禮異同議」와 『國朝喪禮補編』의 관련 양상을 중심으로 -", 동양철학, (36), pp.87~114 (2011), 한국동양철학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)