송 사신단의 개경 游觀과 고려의 외교 공간 활용
A Study on Gaegyeong Tourism of Song Envoys and Goryeo’s Diplomatic Space Utilization
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The diplomacy of Goryeo in the first half of the 12th century was the process of careful choices according to the international situation in East Asia. Goryeo had been leaving several diplomatic channels open while observing the complex international situation of East Asia. In particular, it was necessary to watch the change of the relationship between Jurchen and Song and set the diplomatic direction, while keeping the connection in amity with Song but not being invested. The first year of Injong of Goryeo in which Seo Keung arrived in Goryeo as a member of Song’s delegation was when the difference of diplomatic position between Goryeo and Song had been subtly reveled. The intention of Goryeo was clearly reflected that is the landscape of Gaegyoung that Goryeo wanted to show to Song’s delegation. Goryeo restricted visitors access Suncheongwan and the delegation’s path, and allowed them to guide and tour the spaces within Gaegyeong. Anhwasa temple slected by Goryeo was a place to commemorate the King Yejong of Goryeo and it was also a place where the results of diplomatic negotiations with Hwijong of Song during the King Yejong were arranged in places. By showing Anhwasa temple to Song’s delegation, Goryeo could express that they value the diplomacy with Song. In order to emphasize the Taoism exchange, they also prepared a brief tour of the Bokwonkwan Palace for the delegation because they knew the situation of Song which had placed Taoism above Buddism. As they guided the monumental place of diplomacy with Song, it could have made a friendly bond with Goryeo. The next places were Soongsanmyo, Dongshinsa, and Bojesa where the ritual cermonies held for Song delegation. Soongsanmyo was the place they could share the memories of war against the Kitan, and Bojesa was the place a monk from Song had been stayed and they could find the part of social and cultural exchange of two countries. Dongsinsa was the place that Seo Keung could find out Goryeo’s history and, at the same time, Goryeo could show their own culture different with Song. In other words, Soongsanmyo, Dongsinsa, and Bojesa were where Song’s delegation could experience the Goryeo’s culture, and understand the cultural differences of two countries. Seo Keung’s view written in 『Goryeodokyung』 was basically a stranger’s but the spaces where he saw were selected and provided the frame of understand by Goryeo. Goryeo probably wanted to make them understand the cultural differences between two countries and to smooth the diplomatic negotiation with Song, while offering tours of main attractions to the delegation. The Gaegyeong tourists attractions for Song’s delegation showed that Goryeo in the 12th century actively used the spaces in Gaegyeong for the diplomacy.
Abstract
The diplomacy of Goryeo in the first half of the 12th century was the process of careful choices according to the international situation in East Asia. Goryeo had been leaving several diplomatic channels open while observing the complex international situation of East Asia. In particular, it was necessary to watch the change of the relationship between Jurchen and Song and set the diplomatic direction, while keeping the connection in amity with Song but not being invested. The first year of Injong of Goryeo in which Seo Keung arrived in Goryeo as a member of Song’s delegation was when the difference of diplomatic position between Goryeo and Song had been subtly reveled. The intention of Goryeo was clearly reflected that is the landscape of Gaegyoung that Goryeo wanted to show to Song’s delegation. Goryeo restricted visitors access Suncheongwan and the delegation’s path, and allowed them to guide and tour the spaces within Gaegyeong. Anhwasa temple slected by Goryeo was a place to commemorate the King Yejong of Goryeo and it was also a place where the results of diplomatic negotiations with Hwijong of Song during the King Yejong were arranged in places. By showing Anhwasa temple to Song’s delegation, Goryeo could express that they value the diplomacy with Song. In order to emphasize the Taoism exchange, they also prepared a brief tour of the Bokwonkwan Palace for the delegation because they knew the situation of Song which had placed Taoism above Buddism. As they guided the monumental place of diplomacy with Song, it could have made a friendly bond with Goryeo. The next places were Soongsanmyo, Dongshinsa, and Bojesa where the ritual cermonies held for Song delegation. Soongsanmyo was the place they could share the memories of war against the Kitan, and Bojesa was the place a monk from Song had been stayed and they could find the part of social and cultural exchange of two countries. Dongsinsa was the place that Seo Keung could find out Goryeo’s history and, at the same time, Goryeo could show their own culture different with Song. In other words, Soongsanmyo, Dongsinsa, and Bojesa were where Song’s delegation could experience the Goryeo’s culture, and understand the cultural differences of two countries. Seo Keung’s view written in 『Goryeodokyung』 was basically a stranger’s but the spaces where he saw were selected and provided the frame of understand by Goryeo. Goryeo probably wanted to make them understand the cultural differences between two countries and to smooth the diplomatic negotiation with Song, while offering tours of main attractions to the delegation. The Gaegyeong tourists attractions for Song’s delegation showed that Goryeo in the 12th century actively used the spaces in Gaegyeong for the diplomacy.
참고문헌 (37)
- "宣和奉使高麗圖經(이하 고려도경) 권25, 제전", ~
- 김한규, "사조선록 역주 1" (2012), 소명출판
- 한국고전번역원, "고려도경" (2005), 서해문집
- 이경록, "고려도경" (2005), 황소자리
- 임형수, "「『高麗圖經』譯註」(1)-序의 분석을 중심으로-", 韓國史學報, (65), pp.529~561 (2016), 고려사학회[DOI]
- 김병인, "『고려도경』에 비친 고려인들", 한국중세사연구, (55), pp.77~114 (2018), 한국중세사학회[DOI]
- 김보경, "『고려도경』과 고려의 문화적 형상", 한국한문학연구, (47), pp.275~301 (2011), 한국한문학회[DOI]
- 김수연, "『고려도경』연구의 동향과 활용 가능성", 한국문화연구, 16, pp.269~280 (2009), 한국문화연구원[DOI]
- 장남원, "필사본 『고려도경(高麗圖經)』의 유포와 의의", 한국문화연구, 17, pp.189~218 (2009), 한국문화연구원[DOI]
- 김창현, "고려 개경의 편제와 궁궐" (2011), 경인문화사
- 정은정, "이방인 서긍이 본 皇都 開京과 실상", 한국중세사연구, (55), pp.47~76 (2018), 한국중세사학회[DOI]
- 김규록, "고려중기의 宋 使節 迎送과 伴使의 운용", 역사교육, (134), pp.155~187 (2015), 역사교육연구회
- 김성규, "‘선화봉사고려사절단’의 일정과 활동에 대하여", 한국중세사연구, (40), pp.209~246 (2014), 한국중세사학회
- 강병국, "『高麗圖經』의 坊市와 長廊에 대한 기록 再考", 역사학연구, (70), pp.1~31 (2018), 호남사학회
- 祁慶富, "高麗圖經의 遠洋船隊와 航海技術", 정신문화연구, 64 (1996)
- 문경호, "1123년 徐兢의 고려 항로와 慶源亭", 한국중세사연구, (28), pp.485~519 (2010), 한국중세사학회
- 문경호, "1123년 서긍의 고려 항로에 대한 재검토- 夾界山~馬島 安興亭 구간을 중심으로 -", 역사와 담론, (78), pp.71~105 (2016), 호서사학회
- 허경진, "고려시대 송나라 사행해로(使行海路) 누정의 변천 연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(12), pp.117~139 (2007), 동북아시아문화학회
- "고려도경", ~
- "고려사", ~
- 이미지, "태평한 변방: 고려의 對거란 외교와 그 소산", pp.310~ (2018), 경인문화사
- 김보광, "12세기초 송의 책봉 제의와 고려의 대응", 동국사학, (60), pp.43~84 (2016), 동국역사문화연구소[DOI]
- 李玠奭, "宋 徽宗代 紹述新政의 挫折과 私權的 皇權强化", 동양사학연구, 3 (1996)
- 구보타 료온, "중국 유불도 삼교의 만남", pp.217~220 (1990), 민족사
- 채웅석, "고려 예종대 道家思想·道敎 흥기의 정치적 성격", 한국사연구, (142), pp.105~141 (2008), 한국사연구회
- "문종", ~
- Oongseok Chai, "Interstate Relations in East Asia and Medical Exchanges in the Late Eleventh Century and Early Twelfth Century", KOREAN STUDIES, 41 (2017), UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I PRESS
- "송사 권487, 외국3, 고려", ~
- 김상범, "民間信仰의 公認과 擴散 - 宣和5년 國信使 일행의 해상조난과 海神에 대한 봉호하사 조치를 중심으로", 역사문화연구, (35), pp.199~228 (2010), 역사문화연구소
- "松京廣攷 권6, 사묘", 동신사
- 신안식, "고려전기의 축성과 개경의 황성", 역사와현실, 38, pp.28~29 (2000)
- 김선주, "신라 선도성모 전승의 역사적 의미", 사학연구, (99), pp.1~33 (2010), 한국사학회
- 채미하, "한국 고대 신모(神母)와 국가제의(國家祭儀) –유화와 선도산 신모를 중심으로–", 동북아역사논총, (52), pp.7~42 (2016), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- "삼국사기 권12, 論曰", ~
- 김병인, "고려 예종의 통치행위에 나타난 유형적 특징과 그 정치적 배경", 역사와경계, (79), pp.35~74 (2011), 부산경남사학회
- "신증동국여지승람", ~
- 허흥식, "高麗時代의 國師․王師制度와 그 機能", 역사학보, 67, pp.15~ (1975)
