본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

[국제심포지엄 기조강연] 高麗 恭愍王代의 反元的 改革政治와 ‘丙申年敎書’

The Anti-Yuan Reforms of King Gongmin of the Goryeo Dynasty and the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo (丙申年敎書)” Statement

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This article is a reexamination of the anti-Yuan reforms of the Goryeo Dynasty, focusing on the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo” statement. Its contents are summarized as follows. First, this article briefly outlined the beginning and background of the anti-Yuan reforms. In May 1356, King Gongmin purged the pro-Yuan forces(附元勢力) represented by Ki Cheol(奇轍) as an emergency means, abolished Jeongdonghangseong(征東行省) Imunso(理問所) established by Yuan in Goryeo and mobilized troops to attack Yuan's territory in two directions: northwest and northeast. The reasons King Gongmin was able to carry out these reforms include the decline of the Yuan Empire, his sense of crisis due to the Yuan Empress Ki clan, and the growth of an independent historical consciousness in Goryeo around that time. Second, this article examined the process of announcing the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement and its details. Because it was confirmed that the various measures taken with the beginning of the anti-Yuan reforms were successfully progressed, and in particular, the military activities of the troops advancing to the northwest and northeast were confirmed without any setback, King Gongmin announced the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement and practically supported the anti-Yuan reform politics. It is worth noting that the use of the Yuan era name called Zhi Zheng(至正) was stopped at the same time as the statement was announced because it means that Goryeo stated in its anti-Yuan stance that it would break away from the international order centered on the Yuan Empire. This statement explained the background of the king's removal of the pro-Yuan forces in the previous section. Based on emphasizing the independence of Goryeo, it vowed to revive and reconstruct the nation anew in accordance with laws and discipline. The latter part presented specific reform proposals for 27 items. Overall, this reform plan was the design of a policy aimed at national reconstruction and an expression of determination to rebuild Goryeo into a normal state. Third, this article examined the progress of the anti-Yuan reforms after the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement. Looking at the anti-Yuan aspect, diplomatic relations reached the point of collapse due to Goryeo's purge of the pro-Yuan forces and the military actions against Yuan. However, relations between the two countries were almost restored, and the envoy’s visits were normally resumed, for the Yuan dynasty took a short-term measure, and Goryeo adopted an ingenious and active foreign policy. The two countries' relationship was put in a state of Gimi(羈縻, binding and checking), and unlike the period of interference with Yuan, Goryeo had a superficial tribute relationship to Yuan. This was an important achievement of the anti-Yuan reforms. King Gongmin carried out reform policies with a strong will to rebuild the state, and several important projects were promoted such as the Hanyang(漢陽) Cheondo(遷都, transferring the capital) Movement. Transfer of the capital was important in connection with the reform politics toward state reconstruction. However, soon after, all projects were frustrated due to the threat of Japanese Raiders and invasions by the Red Turban Bandits. The king could not abandon the tenacity to transfer the capital because he tried to overcome the regret he had for the failure of the reform politics toward state reconstruction through the realization of the transfer of the capital. Goryeo eventually established its capital in Baegak(白岳), albeit in a modified form, in the 9th year of King Gongmin. The flow of reforms was frustrated by the threat of intrusion from outside forces and was buried in the transfer of the capital to Baegak.

Abstract

This article is a reexamination of the anti-Yuan reforms of the Goryeo Dynasty, focusing on the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo” statement. Its contents are summarized as follows. First, this article briefly outlined the beginning and background of the anti-Yuan reforms. In May 1356, King Gongmin purged the pro-Yuan forces(附元勢力) represented by Ki Cheol(奇轍) as an emergency means, abolished Jeongdonghangseong(征東行省) Imunso(理問所) established by Yuan in Goryeo and mobilized troops to attack Yuan's territory in two directions: northwest and northeast. The reasons King Gongmin was able to carry out these reforms include the decline of the Yuan Empire, his sense of crisis due to the Yuan Empress Ki clan, and the growth of an independent historical consciousness in Goryeo around that time. Second, this article examined the process of announcing the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement and its details. Because it was confirmed that the various measures taken with the beginning of the anti-Yuan reforms were successfully progressed, and in particular, the military activities of the troops advancing to the northwest and northeast were confirmed without any setback, King Gongmin announced the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement and practically supported the anti-Yuan reform politics. It is worth noting that the use of the Yuan era name called Zhi Zheng(至正) was stopped at the same time as the statement was announced because it means that Goryeo stated in its anti-Yuan stance that it would break away from the international order centered on the Yuan Empire. This statement explained the background of the king's removal of the pro-Yuan forces in the previous section. Based on emphasizing the independence of Goryeo, it vowed to revive and reconstruct the nation anew in accordance with laws and discipline. The latter part presented specific reform proposals for 27 items. Overall, this reform plan was the design of a policy aimed at national reconstruction and an expression of determination to rebuild Goryeo into a normal state. Third, this article examined the progress of the anti-Yuan reforms after the “Byeongsinnyeon-Gyoseo(丙申年敎書)” statement. Looking at the anti-Yuan aspect, diplomatic relations reached the point of collapse due to Goryeo's purge of the pro-Yuan forces and the military actions against Yuan. However, relations between the two countries were almost restored, and the envoy’s visits were normally resumed, for the Yuan dynasty took a short-term measure, and Goryeo adopted an ingenious and active foreign policy. The two countries' relationship was put in a state of Gimi(羈縻, binding and checking), and unlike the period of interference with Yuan, Goryeo had a superficial tribute relationship to Yuan. This was an important achievement of the anti-Yuan reforms. King Gongmin carried out reform policies with a strong will to rebuild the state, and several important projects were promoted such as the Hanyang(漢陽) Cheondo(遷都, transferring the capital) Movement. Transfer of the capital was important in connection with the reform politics toward state reconstruction. However, soon after, all projects were frustrated due to the threat of Japanese Raiders and invasions by the Red Turban Bandits. The king could not abandon the tenacity to transfer the capital because he tried to overcome the regret he had for the failure of the reform politics toward state reconstruction through the realization of the transfer of the capital. Goryeo eventually established its capital in Baegak(白岳), albeit in a modified form, in the 9th year of King Gongmin. The flow of reforms was frustrated by the threat of intrusion from outside forces and was buried in the transfer of the capital to Baegak.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. 김기덕, "14세기 고려의 정치와 사회" (1994), 민음사
  3. 홍영의, "恭愍王 初期 改革政治의 推移(上)", 史學硏究, 42 (1990)
  4. 閔賢九, "高麗 恭愍王의 反元的 改革政治에 대한 一考察", 震檀學報, 68 (1989)
  5. 閔賢九, "許善道先生停年記念韓國史論叢" (1992)
  6. 閔賢九, "李基白先生古稀記念韓國史學論叢 上" (1994)
  7. 김경록, "공민왕대 국제정세와 대외관계의 전개양상", 역사와 현실, (64), pp.197~231 (2007), 한국역사연구회
  8. 이강한, "공민왕 5년(1356) ‘反元改革’의 재검토", 대동문화연구, (65), pp.183~231 (2009), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  9. 최종석, "1356(공민왕 5)~1369년(공민왕 18) 고려-몽골(원) 관계의 성격 - ‘원간섭기’와의 연속성을 중심으로 -", 역사교육, (116), pp.233~271 (2010), 역사교육연구회
  10. 이명미, "공민왕대 초반 군주권 재구축 시도와 奇氏一家 : 1356년(공민왕 5) 개혁을 중심으로", 한국문화, (53), pp.3~33 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  11. 이익주, "1356년 공민왕 反元政治 再論", 역사학보, (225), pp.57~88 (2015), 역사학회
  12. 최윤정, "1356년 공민왕의 ‘反元改革’ 재론", 대구사학, 130, pp.243~280 (2018), 대구사학회[DOI]
  13. 高柄翊, "麗代 征東行省의 硏究", 歷史學報, 14ㆍ19 (1961)
  14. 末松保和, "麗末鮮初의 對明關係", 靑丘史草, 1 (1965)
  15. "高麗史節要 26", ~
  16. 池內宏, "高麗恭愍王의 元에 대한 反抗의 運動", 東洋學報, 7(1) (1917)
  17. 池內宏, "滿鮮史硏究 中世第三冊", ~ (1963)
  18. 閔賢九, "整治都監의 設置經緯", 國民大學論文集, 11 (1977)
  19. 閔賢九, "整治都監의 性格", 東方學志, 23ㆍ24 (1980)
  20. 閔賢九, "益齊 李齊賢의 政治活動", 震檀學報, 51 (1981)
  21. 閔賢九, "高麗政治史論", pp.289~ (2004), 고려대출판부
  22. 李穡, "牧隱詩藁 卷4, 解嘲吟", ~
  23. 민현구, "辛旽의 執權과 그 政治的 性格 上", 歷史學報, 38 (1968)
  24. 閔賢九, "白文寶硏究", 東洋學, 17 (1987)
  25. 閔賢九, "高麗史, 列傳 25, 白文寶傳", ~
  26. 민현구, "辛旽의 執權과 그 政治的 性格 下", 歷史學報, 40 (1968)
  27. 金昌賢, "高麗後期 政房硏究" (1998), 고려대 민족문화연구소
  28. 이기백, "高麗兵制史硏究", pp.155~ (1968), 一潮閣
  29. 閔賢九, "高麗軍制史", pp.333~ (1983), 육군본부
  30. 변태섭, "한국사 19" (1996), 국사편찬위원회
  31. 李永東, "忠勇衛考", 陸軍第三士官學校論文集, 13 (1981)
  32. "東史綱目 第14下", ~
  33. "元史 48, 列傳 第1, 順帝 完者忽都皇后 奇氏", ~
  34. "高麗名賢集 3, 牧隱文藁 15, 曲城府院君 廉公神道碑幷序", ~
  35. 계승범, "동아시아 국제질서 속의 한중관계사", pp.266~267 (2010), 동북아역사재단
  36. 이병도, "高麗時代의 硏究" (1980), 아세아문화사
  37. 이병도, "高麗時代의 硏究" (1980), 아세아문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)