대한제국기 ‘공립’과 ‘사립’의 경계 - 『하재일기』에 나타난 양평공립보통학교 운영 사례를 중심으로 -
The Boundary Between “Public” and “Private” in the Korean Empire - Focusing on the Management of Yangpyeong Public Primary School Found in Hajae-ilgi(Hajae's Diary) -
3
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“Public” schools in the 1900s were not fixed entities. The boundary between “public” and “private” schools was vague and not clearly defined. Schools with names consisting of place names + “public” + school constantly changed despite having the same name. This study confirmed such changes through a case in Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do, from 1902 to 1911. Established in 1902, the private Yeonghwa Primary School soon became a “public” school. However, as the school became difficult to manage and its future became uncertain, the Bunwon private school, located in a nearby region, took over the title of a “public” school in 1906. The Bunwon school changed its name to Yangpyeong Public Primary School after becoming “public” and received various subsidies from the county governor. The management, nevertheless, was headed by Jigyusik, just as it had been as a private school. Although it was dubbed a public school, the school's management was close to that of a private school. Because the distinction between public and private schools was so blurred, public schools were able to become private again. The private Yongmun School, established in Eupnae-myeon in 1906, shared the subsidies with the Yangpyeong Public Primary School (Bunwon School) starting in 1908, under the support of the newly appointed governor. In 1911, the private Yongmun School changed its name to Yangpyeong Public Primary School, and the Bunwon School, previously called Yangpyeong Public Primary School, became a private school. While the name Yangpyeong Public Primary School remained, it was used by two different private schools. In terms of financial management, a “public” school clearly had the advantage of receiving financial support from the central and local governments. However, such support was subject to change, depending on the effort made by the school management and its relationship with the county governor. As a result, schools in the Korean Empire had to make both political and economic efforts to navigate the blurred line between “public” and “private” schools.
Abstract
“Public” schools in the 1900s were not fixed entities. The boundary between “public” and “private” schools was vague and not clearly defined. Schools with names consisting of place names + “public” + school constantly changed despite having the same name. This study confirmed such changes through a case in Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do, from 1902 to 1911. Established in 1902, the private Yeonghwa Primary School soon became a “public” school. However, as the school became difficult to manage and its future became uncertain, the Bunwon private school, located in a nearby region, took over the title of a “public” school in 1906. The Bunwon school changed its name to Yangpyeong Public Primary School after becoming “public” and received various subsidies from the county governor. The management, nevertheless, was headed by Jigyusik, just as it had been as a private school. Although it was dubbed a public school, the school's management was close to that of a private school. Because the distinction between public and private schools was so blurred, public schools were able to become private again. The private Yongmun School, established in Eupnae-myeon in 1906, shared the subsidies with the Yangpyeong Public Primary School (Bunwon School) starting in 1908, under the support of the newly appointed governor. In 1911, the private Yongmun School changed its name to Yangpyeong Public Primary School, and the Bunwon School, previously called Yangpyeong Public Primary School, became a private school. While the name Yangpyeong Public Primary School remained, it was used by two different private schools. In terms of financial management, a “public” school clearly had the advantage of receiving financial support from the central and local governments. However, such support was subject to change, depending on the effort made by the school management and its relationship with the county governor. As a result, schools in the Korean Empire had to make both political and economic efforts to navigate the blurred line between “public” and “private” schools.
참고문헌 (63)
- 邊勝雄, "近代私立學校硏究 : 大韓帝國期 民族系 學校를 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1993
- 윤완, "대한제국말기 민립학교의 교육활동연구" (2001), 한결
- 강명숙, "사립학교의 기원" (2015), 학이시습
- 정진숙, "20세기 초 한국인 설립 사립학교 연구: 설립주체와 재정을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- 임인재, "황해도 지역 사립학교 설립 과정과 주체(1895-1910)", 역사와교육, (28), pp.175~209 (2019), 역사와교육학회[DOI]
- 임인재, "대한제국기 함경남도 사립학교 설립운동의 전개", 기전문화연구, 42(2), pp.211~239 (2021), 기전문화연구소
- 이승환, "한국 및 동양의 공사관(公私觀)과 근대적 변용", 정치사상연구, 6, pp.43~63 (2002), 한국정치사상학회
- 이승훈, "근대와 공공성 딜레마 - 개념과 사상을 중심으로", 민주사회와 정책연구, (13), pp.13~45 (2008), 민주사회정책연구원
- 박규태, "공사(公私) 개념의 일본적 ‘수용문제’ - 서구의 공사 개념과 후쿠자와 유키치 -", 비교일본학, 30, pp.1~27 (2014), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 황병주, "식민지 시기 ‘공’ 개념의 확산과 재구성", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (73), pp.5~44 (2007), 한국사회사학회
- 김정현, "동아시아 公 개념의 전통과 근대 공동체의식", 민주사회와 정책연구, (13), pp.46~71 (2008), 민주사회정책연구원
- "勅令 제145호 ｢小學校令｣", (朝鮮國)官報, ~ (1895)
- 강명숙, "근대 교육에서 ‘공(公)’개념의 의미변화", 교육사학연구, 17(2), pp.1~25 (2007), 교육사학회[DOI]
- 정숭교, "대한제국기 지방학교의 설립주체와 재정", 한국문화, (22), pp.277~308 (1998), 규장각한국학연구원
- 魯仁華, "大韓帝國 時期 官立學校 敎育의 性格 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1989
- 윤현상, "일제하 초등교육재정의 구조와 변동", 박사, pp.2022
- 김종준, "대한제국기 ‘학교비 분쟁’의 양상", 한국문화, (46), pp.85~118 (2009), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 임인재, "평안도 공립소학교의 설립과 학교비 분쟁 (1896~1905)", 기전문화연구, 39(1), pp.63~88 (2018), 기전문화연구소[DOI]
- 김종준, "1900년대 충북 지역의 학교 설립 양상과 학교비 징수 문제", 역사교육, (149), pp.155~194 (2019), 역사교육연구회[DOI]
- 나카바야시히로카즈, "통감부시기 공립보통학교 재정정책의 시행착오적 전개 - 지방제도 개편에 주목하여-", 역사문제연구, 26(3), pp.17~52 (2022), 역사문제연구소
- 서울특별시사편찬위원회, "國譯 荷齋日記 (一)~(八)" (2005)
- 박은숙, "개항 후 分院 운영권의 민간 이양과 운영실태 —荷齋日記를 중심으로—", 한국사연구, (142), pp.251~294 (2008), 한국사연구회
- 박은숙, "分院 貢人 池圭植의 공․사적 인간관계 분석", 한국인물사연구, (11), pp.221~259 (2009), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 박은숙, "燔磁會社의 사원 개별운영체제와 彩器 생산 －1900～1910년 분원 자기업의 변화－", 한국사연구, (159), pp.115~149 (2012), 한국사연구회
- 박은숙, "社員 池圭植의 러일전쟁과 을사조약을 둘러싼 시국 인식", 한국인물사연구, (17), pp.323~357 (2012), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 김헌주, "마을주민의 시선에서 본 의병운동(1894~1909) -경기도 양근군 분원마을에서 벌어진 의병과 관군, 일본군의 전투와 마을의 대응-", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.261~296 (2012), 고려사학회
- 신경미, "『荷齋日記』를 통해 본 19세기 말∼20세기 초 지역 지식인의 변화", 인문과학연구, (26), pp.161~181 (2018), 인문과학연구소
- 송수진, "근대 전환기 평민 지규식池圭植(1851~?)의 교육 인식과 실천", 국학연구, (49), pp.415~446 (2022), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- 이기봉, "고지도를 통해 본 경기지명연구", pp.132~ (2011), 국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소
- "용문산, In 두산백과"[URL]
- "勅令 제69호 ｢府郡의 廢合의 關한 件｣", (大韓帝國)官報, ~ (1908)
- "內部告示 제35호 ｢京畿 楊平郡廳을 前 楊根邑(前楊根郡廳)에 置함｣", (大韓帝國)官報, ~ (1908)
- 楊根郡 私立 永化學校 事務員 鄭雲哲氏, "皇城新聞", 1899
- 구희진, "대한제국기 국민교육의 추진과 굴절", 역사교육, (109), pp.185~227 (2009), 역사교육연구회
- "公立小學校 副敎員 解任 및 任用", (大韓帝國)官報, ~
- "學事｣", 皇城新聞, ~ (1902)
- "學部令 제1호 ｢補助公立小學校規則｣", (朝鮮國)官報, ~ (1896)
- "學部令 제13호", (大韓帝國)官報, ~ (1900)
- "講聞千里", 皇城新聞, ~ (1899)
- "荷齋日記", ~
- 李相一, "雲養 金允植의 사상과 활동 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.1996
- "法學小學", 皇城新聞, ~ (1901)
- "京畿道楊根郡分院學校를 光武十年五月一日붓터 開學하고", 皇城新聞, ~ (1907)
- "大韓帝國職員錄, 공립양근보통학교", ~ (1908)
- "大韓帝國職員錄, 공립양평보통학교", ~ (1910)
- "朝鮮總督府統計年報", ~
- "양평군, In 한국민족문화대백과"[URL]
- "龍校重建", 皇城新聞, ~ (1908)
- "朝鮮諸學校一覽", ~ (1934)
- "楊平公普校舍新築", 東亞日報, ~ (1923)
- "楊平公普新築", 東亞日報, ~ (1923)
- "敍任及辭令", (大韓帝國)官報, ~
- "會中記事", 畿湖興學會月報 제3호, ~ (1908)
- 박은숙, "대한제국기 燔磁會社의 설립과 운영 －1897～1899년 社員 공동운영체제를 중심으로－", 한국사연구, (149), pp.279~319 (2010), 한국사연구회
- 방병선, "1870년대 이후 分院 官窯 변천", 한국학연구, (49), pp.103~128 (2014), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- "김종한", 한국민족문화대백과, ~
- "勅令 제44호 ｢普通學校令｣", (大韓帝國)官報, ~ (1906)
- 국사편찬위원회, "機密第一五四九號, (5) 明治四二年 上半期 韓國中央政況報告書 送付 件", 統監府文書 10, ~ (1909)
- 學部, "韓國敎育ノ旣往及現在", ~ (1909)
- "龍門再開", 皇城新聞, ~ (1908)
- "官立諸學校 卒業生姓名", (大韓帝國)官報, ~ (1910)
- "楊平普通學校", 朝鮮總督府職員錄, ~ (1910)
- "楊平郡", 大韓帝國職員錄, ~ (1909)