빈민가에서 문화유산의 거리로: 홍콩 삼쉬포지역 사례를 통해 본 도시권
From a Slum Area to ‘Wonerland’ of Cultural Heritages: the Case of Sham Shui Po in Hong Kong
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes the case of Sham Shui Po that is famous as a squatter area, focusing on changes in discourses and activities surrounding the area and discusses the implications of this case in the theoretical discussion regarding the ‘Right to the City’. Since 2006, government-led cultural heritage protection program became to increase rapidly. However, private organizations have been raising problems and making new spaces for fights. From several years ago, the district councils of Sham Shui Po and SEE Network have been newly shedding light on the values of the old shops and buildings in the areas that have become the subjects of redevelopment and have been regarded as things that should naturally disappear along with the stream of times. Sham Shui Po is now given meanings as a street of cultural heritages and as an area where the ‘true distinct characteristics of Hong Kong’ remain. The meaning of Sham Shui Po is being changed. In Hong Kong, the issue of city planning and redevelopment is not just limited to the issue of the ‘city’ but also has become to be closely related to the enhancement of civic consciousness about changing themselves by changing the city and the issue of “How should we make the society to which we belong”, which is related to the right to the city. As such, social movements in Hong Kong that began from the issue of city development, in particular, movements in Sham Shui Po have gone beyond the issues of development, and are going toward discussions about what are good lives and what is a city that we want.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the case of Sham Shui Po that is famous as a squatter area, focusing on changes in discourses and activities surrounding the area and discusses the implications of this case in the theoretical discussion regarding the ‘Right to the City’. Since 2006, government-led cultural heritage protection program became to increase rapidly. However, private organizations have been raising problems and making new spaces for fights. From several years ago, the district councils of Sham Shui Po and SEE Network have been newly shedding light on the values of the old shops and buildings in the areas that have become the subjects of redevelopment and have been regarded as things that should naturally disappear along with the stream of times. Sham Shui Po is now given meanings as a street of cultural heritages and as an area where the ‘true distinct characteristics of Hong Kong’ remain. The meaning of Sham Shui Po is being changed. In Hong Kong, the issue of city planning and redevelopment is not just limited to the issue of the ‘city’ but also has become to be closely related to the enhancement of civic consciousness about changing themselves by changing the city and the issue of “How should we make the society to which we belong”, which is related to the right to the city. As such, social movements in Hong Kong that began from the issue of city development, in particular, movements in Sham Shui Po have gone beyond the issues of development, and are going toward discussions about what are good lives and what is a city that we want.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강현수, "‘도시에 대한 권리’ 개념 및 관련 실천 운동의 흐름", 공간과 사회, (32)통권 : 32, pp.42~90 (2009), 한국공간환경학회
- 강현수, "도시에 대한 권리" (2010), 책세상
- 곽노완, "도시권에서 도시공유권으로", 마르크스주의 연구, 8(3), pp.202~220 (2011), 사회과학연구원
- 김용창, "물리적 도시재개발에서 도시권으로", 창작과 비평 (2009)
- 김준호, "공공공간에 대한 소수자의 권리를 위한 시론: 거리노숙인의 ‘도시에 대한 권리’를 중심으로", 공간과 사회, 21(2), pp.35~65 (2011), 한국공간환경학회
- 이현재, "여성주의적 도시권을 위한 시론 차이의 권리에서 연대의 권리로", 공간과 사회, (34), pp.5~32 (2010), 한국공간환경학회
- 장정아, "타자로서의 이주민:홍콩의 중국본토 이주민(新移民)", 비교문화연구, 8(2), pp.37~78 (2002), 비교문화연구소
- 장정아, "우리의 기억, 우리의 도시: 집단기억과 홍콩 정체성", 동북아 문화연구, 1(17), pp.87~115 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
- 조명래, "8‧10 성남 대단지 사건의 재해석과 성남 도시정체성의 모색", 공간과 사회, 21(4), pp.34~66 (2011), 한국공간환경학회
- 최병두, "탈신자유주의를 위한 대안적 도시 전략", 공간과 사회, 21(3), pp.1~34 (2011), 한국공간환경학회
- 황진태, "신자유주의 도시에서 ‘도시에 대한 권리’의 실현 해치맨 프로젝트를 사례로", 공간과 사회, (34), pp.33~59 (2010), 한국공간환경학회
- 황진태, "도시권의 측면에서 바라본 광장의 정치", 공간과 사회, 21(1), pp.42~70 (2011), 한국공간환경학회
- 盧惠明, "香港城市規劃導論" (1999), 三聯書店(香港)有限公司
- 羅永生, "殖民無間道" (2007), Oxford University Press
- 呂大樂, "唔該, 埋單 : 一個社會學家的香港筆記" (2007), Oxford University Press
- 呂烈丹, "不再在精英的口袋裏: 利東街運動對文物保育槪念的啓示", 明報, ~ (2007)
- 馬國明, "組裝香港" (2010), 嶺南大學文化硏究系
- 思網絡, "生活ㆍ深水埗" (2007), 深水埗區議會
- 深水埗舊區更新何去何從計劃, "生活ㆍ深水埗", pp.2007, 思網絡
- 衛煥南, "評論香港房屋定策評議會編熱窩-香港居屋權報告" (2000), 進一步多面體有限公司
- 深水埗市區重建計劃賠償及安置評估硏究: 硏究報告, "葉毅明", ~, pp.立法會CB(1)692 (2001), 00-01(02)
- 葉蔭聰, "Queen's Pier被架空了的兩份名單", ~ (2007)
- 優環長學建築設計硏究中心, "關心社區計劃" (2006), 優環長學建築設計硏究中心
- 李子釗, "你唔好再密D!, In 官僚效率至上的香港公共房屋發展思惟胡恩威主編 香港風格 2: 消滅香港" (2006), 二十面體
- 鄭敏華, "深水埗故事: 從社區公共歷史建築看地方發展史及其人文價値" (2010), 深水埗區議會市區更新及歷史建築保育工作小組
- 趙綺鈴, "文化身份與香港的城市面貌馬國明主編 組裝香港" (2010), 嶺南大學文化硏究系
- 陳慧燕, "後殖民香港在全球化下的城市公刊與文化身份馬國明主編 組裝香港" (2010), 嶺南大學文化硏究系
- 胡恩威, "香港風格2 : 消滅香港" (2006), 二十面體
- 香港獨立媒體, "本土行動皇后碼頭特刊: 還港於民" (2006)
- 香港房屋定策評議會, "熱窩-香港居屋權報告" (2000), 進一步多媒體有限公司
- 籠屋及板間房硏究報告2006, "香港社區組織協會", ~ (2007)
- 黃國鉅, "天星皇后, 有何不同", ~ (2007)
- "496歷史建築物名單‘諮詢’民意, 政府轉移視線皇后碼頭照拆", 蘋果日報, ~ (2007)
- Appadurai, Arjun, "Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics", Environment & Urbanization, 13(2), pp.23~43 (2001)
- Harvey, David, "Debates and developments: the right to the city", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), pp.939~941 (2003)
- Holston, James, "Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries", City & Society, 21(2), pp.245~267 (2009)
- Lefebvre, Henry, "The Right to the City, In Writings on Cities" (1996), Blackwell
- McCann, Eugene J., "Space, citizenship, and the right to the city: A brief overview", Geojournal, 58, pp.77~79 (2002)
- Smart, Alan, "The Shek Kip Mei Myth: Squatters, Fires and Colonial Rule in Hong Kong, 1950-1963" (2006), Hong Kong University Press