이제하 소설을 통해 본 한국문학의 환상성과 미래
An Essay on the Specialities of Fantastics & Prospective in Korean Novels with Results of Analyzing the novels Written by Lee Ze Ha
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, fantasy in the all kinds of cultural products has been increased. Digital technology & ultramodern science are developed faster and faster, fantasies are important more and more. Basically the power of cultural creativities are built on the mimesis and the fantasy. Literature has been is driven too. Now a days, realism based on traditional mimesis had broken down in Korean modern literature. The meanings and functions of the fantastics are embossed in literature and culture. Lee ze ha’s novels are based on the fantasy. He is a painter and novelist. The pictorial images which are like surrealistic paintings discovered very frequently in his literature works. First of all, his master pieces of 60’s are discovered fantastic images more than 80’s. His fantastic images are not moving but fixing thing. So that those are not imposed time, only has the space. Those are not similar to the marvelous or the uncanny Tzvetan Todorov said. Those could be appropriate the hallucination or the phantasm. Korean fantasies in literature are different from the style of western’s. Because Korean cultural had been established upon the confucianism that was focused on the actuality not the other worlds like a Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley or Doctor Faustus written by Wolfgang von Goethe. In Korean fantasy has not shown us the real foreign worlds or existences. Korean fantasy has ghost that disappear after settled some problems with the other human being who has a lasting regret. In the future Korean literature should be accepted factors of the fantastics more and more. Fantasy is not opposite to the realism. Those are constructed literature together. Korean modern novels had received the pictorial fantasy already, seems like Lee ze ha’s novels. But our novelists should have to try accepting the cinematic fantasy which’s improving the movement of fantasy.
Abstract
Recently, fantasy in the all kinds of cultural products has been increased. Digital technology & ultramodern science are developed faster and faster, fantasies are important more and more. Basically the power of cultural creativities are built on the mimesis and the fantasy. Literature has been is driven too. Now a days, realism based on traditional mimesis had broken down in Korean modern literature. The meanings and functions of the fantastics are embossed in literature and culture. Lee ze ha’s novels are based on the fantasy. He is a painter and novelist. The pictorial images which are like surrealistic paintings discovered very frequently in his literature works. First of all, his master pieces of 60’s are discovered fantastic images more than 80’s. His fantastic images are not moving but fixing thing. So that those are not imposed time, only has the space. Those are not similar to the marvelous or the uncanny Tzvetan Todorov said. Those could be appropriate the hallucination or the phantasm. Korean fantasies in literature are different from the style of western’s. Because Korean cultural had been established upon the confucianism that was focused on the actuality not the other worlds like a Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley or Doctor Faustus written by Wolfgang von Goethe. In Korean fantasy has not shown us the real foreign worlds or existences. Korean fantasy has ghost that disappear after settled some problems with the other human being who has a lasting regret. In the future Korean literature should be accepted factors of the fantastics more and more. Fantasy is not opposite to the realism. Those are constructed literature together. Korean modern novels had received the pictorial fantasy already, seems like Lee ze ha’s novels. But our novelists should have to try accepting the cinematic fantasy which’s improving the movement of fantasy.
참고문헌 (40)
- 이제하, "초식" (1974), 민음사
- 이제하, "밤의 수첩" (1991), 나남
- 이제하, "이제하 소설집 龍" (1996), 문학과 지성사.
- 이제하, "독충" (2001), 세계사
- 김미영, "냉장고 속에서도 따뜻한 카스테라-박민규의《카스테라》", 목회와 신학, 2, pp.38~41 (2005), 두란노 서원
- 김미현, "여성소설에 나타난 환상성 연구", 국어국문학, 33(138), pp.339~367 (2004), 국어국문학회
- 김병욱, "한국현대 환상소설의 위상과 기능", 한국현대소설연구, 12, pp.9~15 (2000)
- 김병익, "상투성 파괴, 그 방법과 드러냄 in : 밤의 수첩", pp.409~423 (1980), 나남출판사
- 김윤식, "한국근대작가론고", pp.406~417 (1974), 일지사
- 김윤식, "예술에 대한 목마른 부름 in : 이제하 소설집 龍", pp.262~269 (1986), 문학과 지성사
- 김정진, "환상적 리얼리즘 소설의 상징성-<나그네는 길에서도 쉬지 않는다>를 중심으로", 이문논총(里門論叢), 16, pp.127~137 (1996)
- 김지선, "육조 지괴의 ‘幻’ 대한 고찰", 아시아 문화, 21, pp.167~190 (2005)
- 김태 감수, "달리" (1976), 금성출판사
- 김화영, "고독한 정서, 흐르는 의미의 아름다움 in : 龍", pp.253~261 (1986), 문학과 지성사
- 문광훈, "라오콘의 절규와 호머의 방패 시학의 모든 장르는 우리를 더 나은 것으로 만든다-레싱,「함부르크 희곡론」", 카프카 연구, 10, pp.19~60 (2002), 한국카프카학회
- 박정수, "현대소설에 나타난 환상의 세 모습 in : 한국문학과 환상성", pp.221~272 (2001), 예림기획
- 서강여성문학연구회, "한국문학과 환상성" (2001), 예림기획
- 서기원, "한 세대의 의미와 한계", 문학과 지성, 8 (1972)
- 안숙원, "<구관조> 연작과 백일몽의 세계 in : 한국문학과 환상성", pp.273~302 (2001), 예림기획
- 우찬제, "소설의 카오스모스 혹은 허구의 환상성과 복합성", 문화예술, (265), pp.38~45 (2001)
- 윤지관, "뫼비우스의 심층- 환상과 리얼리즘", 창작과 비평, (123), pp.257~280 (2004)
- 이광훈, "추상소설의 제 문제 - 이제하의 자기구제의 문학", 문학과 지성, 8, pp.334~341 (1972)
- "이제하(1988), ｢주말을 책과 함께｣, 동아일보, 1988.7.9", ~
- 이제하, "’85 이상 문학상 수상 연설문-왜 참고 견디지 않으면 안 되는가 in : 밤의 수첩" (1991), 나남출판사
- 이정윤, "장용학 소설의 환상성 연구", 한국현대문학연구, 39(18), pp.399~424 (2005), 한국현대문학회
- 이혜원, "이태준 소설의 이미지 연구", 상허학보, 1, pp.241~260 (1993)
- 장세진, "90년대 환상(the fantastic) 문학의 또다른 가능성-메타 픽션(Meta-fiction)의 환상성에 관하여-", 상허학보, 10, pp.8~230 (2003), 상허학회
- 정혜경, "이제하 소설의 서술 방식 연구", 현대소설연구, 4(33), pp.46~59 (2007), 한국현대소설학회
- 정화열, "몸의 정치" (1999), 민음사
- 주은우, "시각과 현대성" (2003), 한나래
- 최혜실, "가상공간의 환상성 연구 -동서양 영혼관을 비교를 중심으로 -", 인문콘텐츠, 21(8), pp.215~237 (2006), 인문콘텐츠학회
- 황병하, "환상문학과 한국문학", 세계의 문학, (84), pp.129~160 (1997), 민음사
- 로즈마리 잭슨, "환상성-전복의 문학" (2001), 문학동네
- 수지 개블릭, "르네 마그리트" (2000), 시공사
- 쉬잔 엠 드 라코트, "들뢰즈: 철학과 영화 - 운동-이미지에서 시간-이미지로의 이행" (2004), 열화당
- 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민의 문예이론" (1983), 민음사
- 장 루이 뢰트라, "영화의 환상성" (2002), 동문선
- 질 들뢰즈, "시네마 2: 시간-이미지" (1985), 동문선
- 츠베랑 토도로프, "환상문학 서설" (1996), 한국문화사
- Kathryn Hume, "Fantasy and Mimesis" (1984), Methuen