현대 환상 소설 연구 방법론
The Methodology of Studying Modern Fantasy Epics
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If you consider the desire for stories is the true definition of epics, what you must declare is the characteristic of fantasy that epics contain. Especially, the epic that the fantasy operated in the law of ethics is reflected in means the essence of the epic itself and the possibility of drawing a new line against the surroundings. Therefore, it is necessary that we review fantasy and ethics at the same time as two axes applying to contemporary novels. The approach viewing fantasy epics from a point of ethics has the purpose of establishing an independent narrative characteristic of Korean fantasy epics. Searching for the origins of unique fantasy in Korean literature and applying the ethics inside Korean history and society to them will provide a head start for interpreting existing fantasy epics newly. Discussing fantasy, considering the aspects of producing contemporary epics, becomes synonymous with examining the identity of ideology of Korean modern literature closely. Fantasy is operated keeping an ideology in mind all the time. Thus, considering ethics of an author, readers and his times is essential to study fantasy. Of course, to read all modern fantasy epics with the methodology of ethics is also dangerous to form another prototype. Ethics in this article is a suggestion to read fantasy epics with a new reading method. The new possibility and the old value of Korean modern epics lie in the very desire for fantasy and the taboo against the desire based on human instinct to make stories endlessly, conclusively the ethics deciding the border of the taboo. Literature is born considering ethics for others or minority group at all times. At the same time it is made up of fantasies about others. Furthermore, it can be expanded to the unborn considering social ideology and cultural training again. Ironically fantasy began to fill the gap of unrealistic phenomenon to explain reality. This epic satiety is the ethics of fantasy and the reality of fantasy.
Abstract
If you consider the desire for stories is the true definition of epics, what you must declare is the characteristic of fantasy that epics contain. Especially, the epic that the fantasy operated in the law of ethics is reflected in means the essence of the epic itself and the possibility of drawing a new line against the surroundings. Therefore, it is necessary that we review fantasy and ethics at the same time as two axes applying to contemporary novels. The approach viewing fantasy epics from a point of ethics has the purpose of establishing an independent narrative characteristic of Korean fantasy epics. Searching for the origins of unique fantasy in Korean literature and applying the ethics inside Korean history and society to them will provide a head start for interpreting existing fantasy epics newly. Discussing fantasy, considering the aspects of producing contemporary epics, becomes synonymous with examining the identity of ideology of Korean modern literature closely. Fantasy is operated keeping an ideology in mind all the time. Thus, considering ethics of an author, readers and his times is essential to study fantasy. Of course, to read all modern fantasy epics with the methodology of ethics is also dangerous to form another prototype. Ethics in this article is a suggestion to read fantasy epics with a new reading method. The new possibility and the old value of Korean modern epics lie in the very desire for fantasy and the taboo against the desire based on human instinct to make stories endlessly, conclusively the ethics deciding the border of the taboo. Literature is born considering ethics for others or minority group at all times. At the same time it is made up of fantasies about others. Furthermore, it can be expanded to the unborn considering social ideology and cultural training again. Ironically fantasy began to fill the gap of unrealistic phenomenon to explain reality. This epic satiety is the ethics of fantasy and the reality of fantasy.
참고문헌 (17)
- 나도향, "꿈" (1925), 조선문단
- 박태원, "적멸", 동아일보, ~ (1930)
- 임노월, "처염" (1924), 영대
- 가라타니 고진, "윤리21" (2001), 사회평론
- 게오르그 루카치, "루카치 소설의 이론" (1998), 심설당
- 로즈메리 잭슨, "환상성:전복의 문학" (2001), 문학동네
- 박정수, "현대 소설과 환상 - 새미학술신서 12" (2001), 새미
- 방민호, "환상소설첩 - 근대편, 동시대편" (2004), 향연
- 복거일, "복거일의 세계 환상소설 사전" (2002), 김영사
- A.I. 티탄렌코, "윤리학 입문" (1991), 사상사
- 서강여성문학연구회, "한국문학과 환상성 - 예림문예학신서 15" (2001), 예림기획
- 슬라보예 지젝, "환상의 돌림병" (2002), 인간사랑
- 줄리아 시걸, "환상 - PSYCHO B0OOKS 07" (2003), EJ북스
- 최기숙, "환상 - 문학의기본개념 03" (2003), 연세대학교출판부
- 캐서린 흄, "환상과 미메시스" (2000), 푸른나무
- 토도로프, "덧없는 행복:루소론 환상문학 서설" (1996), 한국문화사
- 프랑수아 레이몽, "환상문학의 거장들" (2001), 자음과 모음
