본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대시의 어조 연구

A study on the tone of modern poetry

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to define the tone of the modern Korean poetry, to decide the fundamental form of it and to inspect its reiteration and transformation. The tone is not the expression of the subjective attitude showing a speaker's emotional state. It is reflective of objective situations in relation of poetic objects. Even if the definition of the tone has been appreciated, I judge that the existing definition is meaningless as it is allowed unlimited classification and incomplete by reason of overlooking poetic situations. In this, I found out that five types of the fundamental forms of the tone, which are “satire”, “praise”, “sympathy”, “reflection” and a “humor” based on relations between poetic subjects and objects and I clarified that reason. These five types conflict each other and generate various changed forms. It is caused by force of irony(paradox included). Irony is a pair of analogy that is a principle organizing a system. Irony, which makes a system disrupt and split, is a necessary condition in complicated poetic situations and power-driven spaces. This study gives you useful concepts in that it helps to inspect the tone throughout all poetic situations and confirm a fundamental form of the poetical relation, to examine its variations and formal expansion and to investigate irony, paradox, an allusion and parody in the context of the tone. As a result of analysis, I expect to renew the definition of the tone of poetry and link a study on the tone of poetry with a study on the poetic consciousness in relation to poetic subjects.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to define the tone of the modern Korean poetry, to decide the fundamental form of it and to inspect its reiteration and transformation. The tone is not the expression of the subjective attitude showing a speaker's emotional state. It is reflective of objective situations in relation of poetic objects. Even if the definition of the tone has been appreciated, I judge that the existing definition is meaningless as it is allowed unlimited classification and incomplete by reason of overlooking poetic situations. In this, I found out that five types of the fundamental forms of the tone, which are “satire”, “praise”, “sympathy”, “reflection” and a “humor” based on relations between poetic subjects and objects and I clarified that reason. These five types conflict each other and generate various changed forms. It is caused by force of irony(paradox included). Irony is a pair of analogy that is a principle organizing a system. Irony, which makes a system disrupt and split, is a necessary condition in complicated poetic situations and power-driven spaces. This study gives you useful concepts in that it helps to inspect the tone throughout all poetic situations and confirm a fundamental form of the poetical relation, to examine its variations and formal expansion and to investigate irony, paradox, an allusion and parody in the context of the tone. As a result of analysis, I expect to renew the definition of the tone of poetry and link a study on the tone of poetry with a study on the poetic consciousness in relation to poetic subjects.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 권혁웅, "목소리는 어떻게 생겨나는가?" (2007), 문예중앙
  2. 권혁웅, "화자문제" (2007), 현대비평과 이론
  3. 권혁웅, "미래파" (2005), 문학과지성사
  4. 김인환, "한국 문학 이론의 연구" (1986), 을유문화사
  5. 김준오, "시론" (1996), 삼지원
  6. 디이터 람핑, "서정시: 이론과 역사" (1994), 문학과지성사
  7. 아리스토텔레스, "시학(21장)" (1982), 삼성출판사
  8. 오규원, "현대시작법" (1993), 문학과지성사
  9. 오성호, "서정시의 이론" (2006), 실천문학사
  10. 이승훈, "시론" (1990), 고려원
  11. 이지엽, "현대시 창작 강의" (2005), 고요아침
  12. 케네스 버크, "네 가지 비유법(현대 서술 이론의 흐름)" (1997), 솔

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)