Exploring Science Communication in Panels of Exhibitions and Proposing its Development Direction in Exhibition Education: Two cases of Natural History Museum
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study were to explore what components of science communication and its level are contained in text panels of exhibitions in natural history museums and to propose its development direction of exhibition education in Korea. First, to find out the component and level of science communication contained in exhibition panels, the researcher team developed the analyzing tool which was called SEPAT (Science Exhibition Panel Analyzing Tool), then employed them to profile the component and level of science communication. Second, the researchers introduced the exemplary designed media of exhibitions to demonstrate how much science communication could be enhanced. The results were made as follows. First, the components of science communication was considerably weighted toward to 'concept' one. There were also a few 'awareness' and 'engagement', both of which were under 5% in each zone of exhibition and there was not 'NOSI' or 'opinion' embedded in the analyzed exhibitions. Second, the various type of designing exhibitions were found to promote or enhance the restrictedly represented components of science communication. It is suggestable for exhibitions to be designed through various type of 'media' to enhance science communication. Visitors are required to experience rich science communication to meet their educational needs, and exhibition developers in natural history museums and other museums are recommended to be professional in containing all components of science communication through various type of designing exhibitions.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to explore what components of science communication and its level are contained in text panels of exhibitions in natural history museums and to propose its development direction of exhibition education in Korea. First, to find out the component and level of science communication contained in exhibition panels, the researcher team developed the analyzing tool which was called SEPAT (Science Exhibition Panel Analyzing Tool), then employed them to profile the component and level of science communication. Second, the researchers introduced the exemplary designed media of exhibitions to demonstrate how much science communication could be enhanced. The results were made as follows. First, the components of science communication was considerably weighted toward to 'concept' one. There were also a few 'awareness' and 'engagement', both of which were under 5% in each zone of exhibition and there was not 'NOSI' or 'opinion' embedded in the analyzed exhibitions. Second, the various type of designing exhibitions were found to promote or enhance the restrictedly represented components of science communication. It is suggestable for exhibitions to be designed through various type of 'media' to enhance science communication. Visitors are required to experience rich science communication to meet their educational needs, and exhibition developers in natural history museums and other museums are recommended to be professional in containing all components of science communication through various type of designing exhibitions.
참고문헌 (36)
- Becher, M., "Exhibitions in museums" (1991), Leicester University and Smithsonian Institution Press
- Burns, T. W., "Science communication: a contemporary definition", Public Understanding of Science, 12, pp.183~202 (2003)
- Bybee, R. W., "Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science", pp.21~46 (2000), American Association for the Advancement of science
- Crawford, B. A., "Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, pp.916~937 (2000)
- Durant, J. R., "Museums and the Public Understanding of Science" (1992), NMSI Trading Ltd
- Durant, J. R., "Science and Culture in Europe", pp.129~137 (1993), Science Museum
- Falk, J. H., "The museum experience" (1992), Whalesback Books
- Falk, J. H., "Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition", Science Education, pp.744~778 (2005)
- Flick, B. L., "Scientific inquiry and nature of science" (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Gregory, J, "Science in public: communication, culture and credibility" (1998), Plenum Trade
- Jung, K., "Introduction to science museum" (2010), Press of Kongju National University
- Irwin, A., "Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development" (1995), Routledge
- Kim, C., "Understanding informal science and learning" (2010), Bookshill
- 김찬종, "자연사 박물관 전시물의 학교 지구과학 교육과정 반영 정도와 전시 방법의 교육적 분석: 미국의 사례를 중심으로", 한국지구과학회지, 27(2), pp.130~139 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Lederman, N. G., "Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, pp.331~359 (1992)
- Lederman, N. G., "Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS):Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.497~521 (2002)
- 이정화, "생애사적 방법으로 탐색한 경력 도슨트의 과학전시해설 전문성 연구", 한국지구과학회지, 34(3), pp.257~273 (2013), 한국지구과학회[DOI]
- Melber, L. H., "Science education in U.S. natural history museums: A historical perspective", Science & Education, 11, pp.45~54 (2002)
- Miller, D., "Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review", Daedalus, 112, pp.29~48 (1983)
- Miller, D., "Scientists and Journalists:Reporting science as news", pp.55~69 (1986), Free Press
- The science curriculum, "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", MEST, ~, pp.2011-361 (2011)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national science education standards" (2000), National Academy Press
- National Science Museum, "Science exhibition brainstorming" (2012), Friendseyeplus
- Ogawa, M., "In Communication and Engagement with Science and Technology: Issues and Dilemmas", pp.3~18 (2013), Routledge
- Office of Policy and Analysis, "The making of exhibitions: Purpose, structure, roles and process" (2002), Smithsonian Institution
- 박영신, "Secondary Beginning Teachers’ Views of Scientific Inquiry With the View of Hands-on, Minds-on, and Hearts-on", 한국지구과학회지, 31(7), pp.798~812 (2011), 한국지구과학회
- 박영신, "과학관 도슨트 양성 프로그램의 실태 분석 및 발전 방향 모색", 한국지구과학회지, 32(7), pp.881~901 (2011), 한국지구과학회
- Schwartz, R. S., "Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88(4), pp.610~645 (2004)
- Stocklmayer, M. S., "Science communication in theory and practice" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Wynne, B., "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", Public Understand of Science, 1(3), pp.281~304 (1992)
- "Education for sustainable development"[URL]
- Xie, Z., "Comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces, Simon Fraser University", 석사, pp.2008
- Yun, A., "A research on the methodology of contents planning for science exhibition as a way of science communication", 석사, pp.2008
- 윤광아, "천문과학관 프로그램에 반영된 과학교육과정의 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.142~151 (2009), 과학교육연구소
- 윤혜련, "국립과천과학관의 천문영역 패널 설명의 용어 분석", 과학교육연구지, 36(2), pp.329~340 (2012), 과학교육연구소