본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자연사박물관의 진화관 전시물 패널에 반영된 과학의 본성 분석-서대문 자연사박물관과 시카고 자연사박물관을 중심으로-

Analyzing the Nature of Science that was Reflected on the Exhibition Panel of Evolution House at Natural History Museums: Centered on Seodaemun Museum of Natural History and the Field Museum in Chicago

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study was to analyze the degree of reflection of the nature of science in the exhibitions of Evolution House at Seodaemun Museum of Natural History and the Field Museum in Chicago according to the framework for analysis in regards to the nature of science and discover how well they perform the roles as informal educational venues. The nature of science, which was applied to the exhibition in Evolution House, mostly reflected the domain of the generation of scientific knowledge that was relevant to ‘Category I (Knowledge generated by science and the nature of science- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 92%(78/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 86%(224/259))’. The exhibitions relevant to ‘Category II (Participation in the process of experiment, scientific process function, and deduction- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 19%(16/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 22%(58/259))’ and ‘Category III (Thoughts of scientists, work and scientific mind- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 5%(4/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 17%(44/259)’ had the second highest percentage. As for the domain of ‘Category IV (Relationships and interactions among the social structure and sociality of knowledge, technology, and science- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 0%(0/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 2%(5/259)), it showed that the reflected exhibition could not be found at Seodaemun Museum of Natural History, and it was reflected at very low rates at the Field Museum in Chicago. Based on these results, it could be known that the nature of science was as yet concentrated on one aspect at the natural history museums in Korea and overseas, and it was judged that they were insufficient to play the role as the best place for students to directly experience the nature of science, which is hard to manage at schools.

Abstract

This study was to analyze the degree of reflection of the nature of science in the exhibitions of Evolution House at Seodaemun Museum of Natural History and the Field Museum in Chicago according to the framework for analysis in regards to the nature of science and discover how well they perform the roles as informal educational venues. The nature of science, which was applied to the exhibition in Evolution House, mostly reflected the domain of the generation of scientific knowledge that was relevant to ‘Category I (Knowledge generated by science and the nature of science- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 92%(78/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 86%(224/259))’. The exhibitions relevant to ‘Category II (Participation in the process of experiment, scientific process function, and deduction- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 19%(16/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 22%(58/259))’ and ‘Category III (Thoughts of scientists, work and scientific mind- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 5%(4/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 17%(44/259)’ had the second highest percentage. As for the domain of ‘Category IV (Relationships and interactions among the social structure and sociality of knowledge, technology, and science- Seodaemun Museum of Natural History 0%(0/85), the Field Museum in Chicago 2%(5/259)), it showed that the reflected exhibition could not be found at Seodaemun Museum of Natural History, and it was reflected at very low rates at the Field Museum in Chicago. Based on these results, it could be known that the nature of science was as yet concentrated on one aspect at the natural history museums in Korea and overseas, and it was judged that they were insufficient to play the role as the best place for students to directly experience the nature of science, which is hard to manage at schools.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정 고교 과학과 교육과정 해설서" (2009), 대한교과서
  2. 교육부, "7차 과학과 교육과정 해설서" (1997), 대한교과서
  3. 김수현, "한국 자연사박물관 전시의 발전방향-화석관련 전시물을 중심으로-", 고생물학회지, 22(2), pp.105~113 (2006), 한국고생물학회
  4. 김찬종, "비형식 과학학습의 이해" (2010), 북스힐
  5. 김찬종, "우리나라 과학교육의 현실과 자연사 박물관의 중요성", 한국지구과학회지, 23(7) (2002), 한국지구과학회
  6. 손정주, "자연사박물관 교육프로그램에 대한 참가 학생과 학부모의 만족도 및 학교교육과의 연계에 대한 인식 조사 : 서대문자연사박물관을 중심으로", 과학교육연구지, 33(2), pp.237~247 (2009), 과학교육연구소
  7. 신명경, "자연사박물관 전시물의 특징 분석", 한국지구과학학회지, 24(4), pp.281~289 (2003)
  8. 이선경, "자연사박물관의 전시에 반영된 과학의 본성", 한국지구과학회지, 26(5), pp.376~386 (2005), 한국지구과학회
  9. 이선경, "과학탐구공동체 제안을 위한 사회과학적 학습 자료로서 자연사박물관 전시의 교육적 잠재성 탐색: 지진 주제를 중심으로", 한국지구과학회지, 29(6), pp.506~519 (2008), 한국지구과학회
  10. 이지영, "자연사박물관 공룡관에 반영된 과학의 본성과 증거 기반 설명 활동을 통한 중학생들의 과학의 본성 학습", 석사, pp.2008
  11. 정주혜, "미국 자연사박물관의 전시물에 반영된 학교 과학교육과정", 생물교육, 33(2), pp.235~247 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
  12. 정주혜, "교과서와 자연사박물관의 진화에 관한 증거 기반 설명의 특성", 생물교육, 38(2), pp.254~269 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
  13. 최윤희, "제 7차 초·중등 과학교과서의 과학사에 도입된 과학의 본성 분석", 석사, pp.2005
  14. 최지은, "자연사 박물관 관람객의 관람유형과 관람만족도의 관계", 한국지구과학회지, 25(5), pp.315~326 (2004), 한국지구과학회
  15. American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Science for all Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
  16. Chiappetta, E. L., "A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), pp.713~725 (1991)
  17. Garder, T., "The Unschooled Mind: How children think and how schools" (1991), Basic Books
  18. Hein, G. E., "Learning in the Museum" (1998), Routledge
  19. Lee, Y. H., "How do the high school biology textbooks introduce the nature of science", 박사, pp.2008
  20. Rennie, L. J., "Toward an agenda for advancing researchon science learning in out-of-school settings", Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), pp.112~120 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)