「-てしまう」의 대응생략에 관한 고찰 - ‘-었/-ㄴ다’유형과 요인을 심으로
A Study on Corresponding Korean Omission of Japanese 「-te shimau」 - With a Focus on Types ‘-eossda/-nda’ and Factors -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study considers types and factors of the Korean clausal suffix ‘-eossda/-nda’ etc, which has the highest usage rate among the ommission corresponding to the Japanese suffix 「-te shimau」. Corresponding Korean Omission of 「-te shimau」 refers to the meaning of the verb joining with 「-te shimau」, the tense of 「shimau」 and the expression that follows 「-te shimau」 not to ‘-beorida/-malda’, etc. The ommission corresponding to 「-te shimau」 occurs because combination with ‘-beorida/-malda’ is restricted when the preceding verb has features [+generation][+positive][-action][-instantaneity], when the cooccuring adverbs have features [+homeostasis][+repeatability][+positive], when the corresponding Korean suffix types are ‘-eojida/-ge doeda’, or when the corresponding Korean is the in the highest honorific form. In addition, because the Japanese conjunctive clause 「-te shimau」, which connects clauses in temporal order, referes to completed events, correspondence is omitted. When combined with a modality expression at the end of a sentence, correspondence is omitted because 「-te shimau」 originally has the meaning of modality, which in turn causes meanings to overlap. If a learner of Japanese language who speaks Korean natively sufficiently identifies factors of such ommission of correspondence, then his or her learning and comprehension of 「-te shimau」 will improve significantly. The current study expands previous research that focuses on the contrast between 「-te shimau」 and ‘-beorida/-malda’, and shifts the focus to the corresponding omission ‘-eossda/-nda’ to suggest their factors. The results are significant in that they are generated by a new attempt regarding corresponding ommission of 「-te shimau」.
Abstract
The current study considers types and factors of the Korean clausal suffix ‘-eossda/-nda’ etc, which has the highest usage rate among the ommission corresponding to the Japanese suffix 「-te shimau」. Corresponding Korean Omission of 「-te shimau」 refers to the meaning of the verb joining with 「-te shimau」, the tense of 「shimau」 and the expression that follows 「-te shimau」 not to ‘-beorida/-malda’, etc. The ommission corresponding to 「-te shimau」 occurs because combination with ‘-beorida/-malda’ is restricted when the preceding verb has features [+generation][+positive][-action][-instantaneity], when the cooccuring adverbs have features [+homeostasis][+repeatability][+positive], when the corresponding Korean suffix types are ‘-eojida/-ge doeda’, or when the corresponding Korean is the in the highest honorific form. In addition, because the Japanese conjunctive clause 「-te shimau」, which connects clauses in temporal order, referes to completed events, correspondence is omitted. When combined with a modality expression at the end of a sentence, correspondence is omitted because 「-te shimau」 originally has the meaning of modality, which in turn causes meanings to overlap. If a learner of Japanese language who speaks Korean natively sufficiently identifies factors of such ommission of correspondence, then his or her learning and comprehension of 「-te shimau」 will improve significantly. The current study expands previous research that focuses on the contrast between 「-te shimau」 and ‘-beorida/-malda’, and shifts the focus to the corresponding omission ‘-eossda/-nda’ to suggest their factors. The results are significant in that they are generated by a new attempt regarding corresponding ommission of 「-te shimau」.
참고문헌 (18)
- 국립국어원, "한국어 문법2", pp.24~559 (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김경임, "韓ㆍ日両言語の翻訳に見られる「-てしまう」と「-어 버리다」の対応関係について", 비교일본학, 33, pp.107~130 (2015), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 김수영, "日韓両言語の補助動詞「てしまう」と「아", 어 버리다」の対照研究 ‒統辞的な特徴を中心に‒, 2016, pp.(53), 51~72[DOI]
- 김영태, "현대 국어 보조용언 연구 문창사 pp", pp.61~70 (1997), 문창사
- 김종록, "외국인을 위한 표준한국어문법", pp.162~163 (2008), 박이정
- 김효신, "완료표현 '-고 말다'와 '-어 버리다'의 한국어 교육학적 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2007
- 남영신, "한국어용법 핸드북", pp.412~ (2005), 모멘토 p
- 도요나가마키코, "일본어권 학습자를 위한 한국어 보조동사 교육방안 연구-‘(-어)버리다’와 ‘(-고)말다’를 중심으로", 석사, 한국어교육학, pp.2015
- 박소영, "한국어 동사구 수식 부사와 사건구조", pp.175~185 (2004), 태학사
- 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어 문법사전", pp.297~317 (1999), 연세대학교출판부
- 서정수, "국어문법 한양대학교출판원 pp", pp.61~ (1996), 한양대학교출판원
- 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구", pp.200~201 (1996), 한국문화사
- 오미선, "補助動詞 ｢しまう｣とそれに対応する韓国語", 대어문논총, 3, pp.193~206 (1990), 경희대학교비교문화연구소
- 이미숙, "현대 일본어에 있어서의 ｢してしまう｣에 대한 고찰", 日語日文學硏究, 27, pp.57~80 (1995), 한국일어일문학회
- 이희경, "「-てしまう」と 「-아", 어 버리다」の構文論的特徵の考察, 2007, pp.60(1), 153~170[DOI]
- 장미라, "한국어 보조 용언의 상적양태적 의미 기능과 통사적 특징", 배달말, (38), pp.33~60 (2006), 배달말학회
- 市川保子, "日本語誤用例小辭典", pp.126~ (1997), 凡人社
- 吉川武時, "日本語文法入門", pp.127~130 (1989), 株式會社アルク