現代日本語の結果継続を表す「-テイ-」とそれに対応する現代 韓国語の形式「-e iss-」、「-ess-」について
A contrastive study on aspect system between Japanese and Korean -on the contrast of resultative meaning of Japanese verbal suffix [-tei-] and Korean verbal suffixes [-e iss-][-ess-]-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to reanalyze the Japanese verbal suffix [-tei-], which has resultative meaning and the Korean verbal suffixes [-e iss-][-ess-], which seem to correspond with [-tei-]. The results of this study follow below (1) The resultative meaning of [-tei-] and [-e iss-] results from existential verbs, [iru] and [iss]. (2) The main function of [-tei-] and [-e iss-] indicate phenomenon-depiction sentence. (3) There are two forms in Korean, [-e iss-] and adjectival verb [-ess-], which is corresponded to [-tei-] in Japanese. (4) Through the contrast between [-ess-] and [-e iss-], I found out that it is hard for adjectival verbs, which is using [-ess-] , to use [-e iss-] form and locative [ey]. (5) The usage of the Korean verbal suffix [-e iss-] is restricted grammatically because that they need existence of the subject, namely visible substance, whereas the usage of the korean verbal suffix [-ess-] is not something visible, in other words, it indicates abstract feature of the subject.
Abstract
This study aims to reanalyze the Japanese verbal suffix [-tei-], which has resultative meaning and the Korean verbal suffixes [-e iss-][-ess-], which seem to correspond with [-tei-]. The results of this study follow below (1) The resultative meaning of [-tei-] and [-e iss-] results from existential verbs, [iru] and [iss]. (2) The main function of [-tei-] and [-e iss-] indicate phenomenon-depiction sentence. (3) There are two forms in Korean, [-e iss-] and adjectival verb [-ess-], which is corresponded to [-tei-] in Japanese. (4) Through the contrast between [-ess-] and [-e iss-], I found out that it is hard for adjectival verbs, which is using [-ess-] , to use [-e iss-] form and locative [ey]. (5) The usage of the Korean verbal suffix [-e iss-] is restricted grammatically because that they need existence of the subject, namely visible substance, whereas the usage of the korean verbal suffix [-ess-] is not something visible, in other words, it indicates abstract feature of the subject.
참고문헌 (14)
- 송창선, "‘-고 있-’과 ‘-어 있-’의 기능과 의미 연구", 언어과학연구, (62), pp.179~204 (2012), 언어과학회
- 임완수, "「シテイル」と「-고 있-」, 「-어 있-」, 「-었-」の対照研究─形容性動詞の「-었-」に注目して─", 동북아 문화연구, 1(45), pp.425~442 (2015), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 임홍빈, "부정법 {어}와 상태진술의 {고}", 논문집, 8, pp.13~36 (1998)
- 정태구, "＇어 있다＇의 의미와 논항구조", 국어학, 24, pp.203~230 (1994), 국어학회
- 한동완, "＇-어 있-＇구성의 결합 제약에 대하여", 형태론, 2(2), pp.257~288 (2000)
- 安平鎬, "日韓両言語のアスペクトに関する対照研究-アスペクト形式の文法化を中心に", 박사, pp.2001
- 岡智之, "存在構文に基づくテイル(テアル)構文", EX ORIENTE, 1, pp.113~131 (1999), 大阪外国語大学言語社会学会
- 岡智之, "存在型アスペクトとしての朝鮮語고", 어 있다{ko, EX ORIENTE, pp.2000, 3[DOI]
- 奥田靖雄, "アスペクトの研究をめぐって(上)", 教育国語, 53, pp.33~44 (1978), 教育科学研究会国語部会
- 奥田靖雄, "アスペクトの研究をめぐって(下)", 教育国語, 54, pp.14~27 (1978), 教育科学研究会国語部会
- 金田一春彦, "国語動詞の一分類", 言語研究, 15, pp.5~26 (1950)
- 工藤真由美, "アスペクト·テンス体系とテクスト-現代日本語の時間の表現" (1995), ひつじ書房
- 杉本武, "論集ことば", pp.101~115 (1988), くろしお出版
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ" (1984), くろしお出版