1920~30년대 韓中 현대시의 ‘모더니즘’ 수용 양상 비교
A Comparative Study on the Acceptance of Modernism in the 1920s~30s Korean and Chinese Modern Poetry
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Modernism has been formed as an opposition against Rationalism in the end of 19th century and a existing tradition and conventionality through the history of Western civilization that is the birthplace. However, Modernism in both countries took on a special aspect with a combination of the general aspect of the western literary and her own aspect and has been accepted by the unique cultural environment of Korea and China only over a decade, while the most trends of western literature that had formed and developed for many centuries. Modernism in the world of poetry of both countries could not but have an aspect different from western Modernism due to refraction that it has to be undergone by the main agent through the process of the acceptance. In Korea, Modernism has a refracted form in accordance with the characteristic of Japanese culture because most intellectuals in Korea didn't accept it directly, but they did it when they studied in Japan as the children the middle class in colony. For example, 'Anglo-American Modernism' is called 'intellectualism' which means philosophy in Korea due to the japanese effect. However, in china, they showed a different aspect from Korea because a lot of students went to Europe and U.S.A. to study and they experienced their trend of literature directly. It minimized the refraction of the trend of western literature. On the other hand, Modernism leaned toward Symbolism but were indifferent to Futuristic relatively in the world of poetry of China because contemporary writers in China had a distance from their mental mechanism against Futuristic literature that denied traditional art and thought throughly that human being had made. The point that we have to investigate and reveal the truth carefully is we shouldn't have to be based on and judge the western Modernism because Modernism of the both countries has a different cultural environment from the western one. Modernism has developed with a clear classification, Anglo-American Modernism and European Modernism in western, but there is no border in Korea and China. The contemporary poets in Korea and China had developed and produced their own Korean and Chinese Modernism that are mixed their wandering, disillusionment, and ideal under the gloomy political reality and western Modernism, symbolism, and traditional philosophy and literature. In other words, Modernism in the world of poetry of Korea and China does not correspond with the western one, but they have their own characteristic through the process of acceptance in their ways.
Abstract
Modernism has been formed as an opposition against Rationalism in the end of 19th century and a existing tradition and conventionality through the history of Western civilization that is the birthplace. However, Modernism in both countries took on a special aspect with a combination of the general aspect of the western literary and her own aspect and has been accepted by the unique cultural environment of Korea and China only over a decade, while the most trends of western literature that had formed and developed for many centuries. Modernism in the world of poetry of both countries could not but have an aspect different from western Modernism due to refraction that it has to be undergone by the main agent through the process of the acceptance. In Korea, Modernism has a refracted form in accordance with the characteristic of Japanese culture because most intellectuals in Korea didn't accept it directly, but they did it when they studied in Japan as the children the middle class in colony. For example, 'Anglo-American Modernism' is called 'intellectualism' which means philosophy in Korea due to the japanese effect. However, in china, they showed a different aspect from Korea because a lot of students went to Europe and U.S.A. to study and they experienced their trend of literature directly. It minimized the refraction of the trend of western literature. On the other hand, Modernism leaned toward Symbolism but were indifferent to Futuristic relatively in the world of poetry of China because contemporary writers in China had a distance from their mental mechanism against Futuristic literature that denied traditional art and thought throughly that human being had made. The point that we have to investigate and reveal the truth carefully is we shouldn't have to be based on and judge the western Modernism because Modernism of the both countries has a different cultural environment from the western one. Modernism has developed with a clear classification, Anglo-American Modernism and European Modernism in western, but there is no border in Korea and China. The contemporary poets in Korea and China had developed and produced their own Korean and Chinese Modernism that are mixed their wandering, disillusionment, and ideal under the gloomy political reality and western Modernism, symbolism, and traditional philosophy and literature. In other words, Modernism in the world of poetry of Korea and China does not correspond with the western one, but they have their own characteristic through the process of acceptance in their ways.
참고문헌 (86)
- "《開闢》 (경성): 192년 6월 25일~ 1926년 8월 1일", ~
- "《三四文學》 (경성): 1934년 9월 1일 ~ 1935년 3월 1일", ~
- "《新文藝》 (上海): 1929년 9월 15일 ~ 1930년 4월 15일", ~
- "《新詩》 (上海): 1936년 10월 10일 ~ 1937년 7월 10일", ~
- "《現代》 (上海): 1932년 5월 1일 ~ 1935년 5월 1일", ~
- "《現代詩風》 (上海): 1935년 10월", ~
- 김승희, "이상" (1993), 문학세계사
- 김유중, "김기림" (1996), 문학세계사
- 이숭원, "정지용" (1996), 문학세계사
- 藍棣之, "現代派詩選" (1986), 人民文學出版社
- 萬直純, "《卞之琳文集》 (上⋅中⋅下卷)" (2002), 安徽敎育出版社
- 卞之琳, "漢園集" (1936), 商務印書館
- 曹葆華, "無題草" (1937), 文化生活出版社
- 何其芳, "何其芳文集" (1982), 人民文學出版社
- 何其芳, "何其芳全集" (2000), 河北人民出版社
- 권영민, "한국현대문학비평사" (1981), 단국대출판부
- 구상, "이상평전" (1987), 범양사
- 김명옥, "한국 모더니즘 시인 연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- 김용직, "한국현대시연구" (1974), 일지사
- 김용직, "《한국근대시사》 (상하)" (1986), 학연사
- 김윤식, "이상연구" (1987), 문학사상사
- 김윤식, "한국근대문예비평사연구" (1976), 일지사
- 김학동, "정지용연구" (1988), 민음사
- 김현창, "스페인文學史" (1995), 민음사
- 마르셀 레몽, "프랑스現代詩史" (1984), 文學과知性社
- 문덕수, "한국모더니즘시연구" (1981)
- 문학과 비평연구회, "1930년대 문학과 근대체험" (1999), 이회문화사
- 박민수, "현대시의 리얼리즘과 모더니즘. in: 모더니즘 연구" (1993), 자유세계
- 박인기, "한국현대시의 모더니즘 연구" (1988), 단대출판부
- 백낙청, "리얼리즘과 모더니즘" (1984), 창작과비평사
- 신범순, "한국 현대시사의 매듭과 혼" (1992), 민지사
- 에즈라 파운드, "現代詩學入門" (1984), 文藝出版社
- 오세영, "20세기한국시연구" (2001), 새문사
- 오스발트 A. G., "서구의 몰락" (2008), 책세상
- 원명수, "모더니즘 시 연구" (1987), 계명대 출판부
- 이승훈, "한국 모더니즘 시사" (2000), 문예출판사
- 이승훈, "모더니즘 시론" (1995), 문예출판사
- 이영걸, "英美시와 한국시II" (1999), 한신문화사
- 이창배, "T. S. 엘리엇: 인간과 문학" (1999), 동국대학교 출판부
- 정현종, "시의 이해" (1983), 민음사
- 조달곤, "한국 모더니즘 시학의 지형도" (2006), 국학자료원
- 채만묵, "1930년대 한국 시문학 연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- 한국문학연구회, "1930년대 문학연구" (1993), 평민사
- 황동규, "황무지-엘리엇" (1998), 민음사
- Charles Chadwick, "象徵主義" (1984), 서울대학교 출판부
- Malcolm Bradbury, "Modernism" (1976), Penguin Books
- R. S 퍼네스, "표현주의" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
- 高恒文, "京派文人: 學院派的風采" (2000), 上海敎育出版社
- 羅振亞, "中國現代主義詩歌流派史" (1993), 北方文藝出版社
- 羅振亞, "中國現代主義詩歌史論" (2002), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 譚楚良, "中國現代派文學詩論" (1996), 學林齣版社
- 唐正序, "20世紀中國文學與西方現代主義思潮" (1992), 四川人民出版社
- 藍棣之, "現代詩的情感與形式" (1994), 華夏出版社
- 卞之琳, "人與詩: 憶舊說新" (1984), 三聯書店
- 孫玉石, "中國現代詩歌藝術" (1992), 人民文學出版社
- 孫玉石, "中國現代主義詩潮史論" (1999), 北京大學出版社
- 楊匡漢, "中國現代詩論" (1986), 花城出版社
- 楊東平, "城市季風 ― 北京和上海的文化精神" (1994), 東方出版社
- 艾略特著, "艾略特文學評論集" (1994), 百花洲文藝出版社
- 王澤龍, "中國現代主義詩潮論" (1995), 華中師範大學出版社
- 呂周聚, "中國現代主義詩學" (2001), 人民文學出版社
- 吳忠誠, "現代派詩歌精神與方法" (1999), 東方出版社
- 吳曉東, "象徵主義與中國現代文學" (2001), 安徽敎育出版社
- 袁可嘉, "現代派論⋅英美詩論" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
- 李怡, "中國現代新詩與古典詩歌傳統" (1994), 西南師範大學出版社
- 張同道, "探險的風旗--論20世紀中國現代主義詩潮" (1998), 安徽敎育出版社
- 周敬, "現代派文學在中國" (1986), 遼寧大學出版社
- 陳旭光, "中國詩學的會通―20世紀中國現代主義詩學硏究" (2002), 北京大學出版社
- 黃晉凱等, "象徵主義⋅意象派" (1989), 中國人民大學出版社
- 김기진, "우리가 걸어온 30년(2)", 사상계 (1958)
- 김유중, "김기림의 래디컬 모더니즘 수용과 그 의의", 한국현대문학연구, 4 (1995)
- 김효정, "모더니즘 이론과 1930년대 한국 모더니즘", 韓國傳統文化硏究, 10 (1995)
- 아드리안 마린, "아방가르드는 어떻게 정의되는가", 외국문학 (1984)
- 이보경, "한중 언문일치 운동과 영미 이미지즘", 중국현대문학, (31), pp.29~58 (2004), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 이복숙, "韓國과 日本의 모더니즘詩 比較硏究", 건대학술지, (34) (1990)
- 정성은, "中國三十年代現代主義詩硏究", 박사, 중문과, pp.1992
- 황지유, "戴望舒詩硏究", 석사, 중문과, pp.1999
- Ezra Pound, "A Few Don’ts by an Imagiste, Poetry, March", ~ (1913)
- 羅振亞, "20世紀中國現代主義詩潮槪觀", 福建師範大學學報, (2) (2005), 哲學社會科學版
- 王毅, "<價値中心的損失, 替代與現代中國的現代主義詩歌>, 《西南師大推薦論文》", ~
- 劉振球, "超前與滯後的文化尶尬-中國現代主義文學本土化片論", 雁北師範學院學報, 16(4) (2008)
- 龍泉明, "現代主義詩歌在現代中國的命運", 中州學刊, (2) (1996)
- 龍泉明, "中國現代主義詩歌成就估評", 學 與探索, (133) (2001)
- 陳旭光, "中西詩學從對立走向融合--論20世紀中國現代主義詩歌的“詩學革命”>", 北京大學學報, 37(201) (2000)
- 李鑫, "未來主義文學在中國", 世界文學評論 (2006)
- 賀麥曉, "中國早期現代詩歌中的現代性", 詩探索, (4) (1996)