본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

각막절편 두께 측정법의 비교: 초음파 각막두께측정계의 차감법, 직접측정법과 빛간섭단층촬영계

Comparison of Flap Thickness Measured with Ultrasound Subtraction Method, Direct Method, and Optical Coherence Tomography

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

목적: 펨토초레이저 라식안에서 각막절편 두께를 초음파 각막두께측정계에 의한 차감법, 직접측정법 및 빛간섭단층촬영계로 측정하여 세 가지 방법에 따른 결과를 비교하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 펨토초레이저를 이용하여 라식 수술을 시행한 37명 65안이 연구에 포함되었다. 각막절편 두께를 술 중 초음파 각막두께 측정계를 이용하여 차감법과 직접측정법으로 측정하였고, 술 후에는 빛간섭단층촬영계를 이용하여 측정하였다. 세 가지 측정법에 따 른 결과를 비교 분석하였다 결과: 차감법과 빛간섭단층촬영계에 의한 측정값 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었으며(p=0.511), 상관계수 0.820으로 높은 양적 선형관계를 보였다(p<0.001). 그러나 직접측정법은 차감법 및 빛간섭단층촬영계와 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였으며(p<0.001), 낮은 일치도를 보였다. 또한 직접측정법은 차감법에 비해 측정 성공률이 낮았다(54% vs 95%). 결론: 차감법과 빛간섭단층촬영계를 이용하여 측정한 각막절편 두께는 직접 측정법에 의한 측정값과 차이를 보였으며, 직접측정법은 차감법과 일치도가 낮고 측정의 어려움이 있어 차감법을 대체하기 어려울 것으로 생각된다.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the flap thicknesses measured with the ultrasound (US) subtraction method, the direct method, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK eyes. Methods: The present study included 65 eyes of 37 patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK surgery. Flap thickness was measured intraoperatively using the direct and subtraction methods with US pachymetry and postoperatively using anterior segment OCT. Flap thickness measurements were compared among the three methods. Results: There was no significant difference between the flap thickness measured using the US subtraction method and OCT (p = 0.511). The flap thickness values obtained by these two different methods also correlated well with each other (γ = 0.820, p < 0.001). However, flap thickness measured using the US direct method was significantly different (p < 0.001) with a low agreement value compared to the other two methods. Furthermore, the US direct method showed a lower measurement success rate compared to the US subtraction method (54% vs. 95%). Conclusions: Flap thickness measured using the US subtraction method and OCT showed different values compared to that measured using the US direct method. Because of the lower measurement success rate and agreement value, the US direct method is not capable of being used in substitute for the US subtraction method.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Knorz M, "Flap and interface complications in LASIK", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 13, pp.242~245 (2002)
  2. Seiler T, "Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis", J Refract Surg, 14, pp.312~317 (1998)
  3. Stulting R, "Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia", Ophthalmology, 106, pp.13~20 (1999)
  4. Solomon K, "Flap thickness accuracy comparison of 6 microkeratome models", J Cataract Refract Surg, 30, pp.964~977 (2004)
  5. Talamo J, "Reproducibility of flap thickness with IntraLase FS and Moria LSK-1 and M2 microkeratomes", J Refract Surg, 22, pp.556~561 (2006)
  6. Schumer DJ, "The Nidek MK-2000 microkeratome system", J Refract Surg, 17, pp.250~251 (2001)
  7. Sutton G, "Accuracy and precision of LASIK flap thickness using the IntraLase femtosecond laser in 1000 consecutive cases", J Refract Surg, 24, pp.802~806 (2008)
  8. Giledi O, "Reproducibility of LASIK flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome", J Cataract Refract Surg, 30, pp.1031~1037 (2004)
  9. Flanagan GW, "Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes", J Refract Surg, 19, pp.113~123 (2003)
  10. Flanagan G, "Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis", J Cataract Refract Surg, 29, pp.1674~1683 (2003)
  11. Muallem MS, "Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement", J Cataract Refract Surg, 30, pp.2295~2302 (2004)
  12. Eisner R, "Technique for measuring laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the IntraLase laser", J Cataract Refract Surg, 32, pp.556~558 (2006)
  13. Stahl JE, "Anterior segment OCT analysis of thin IntraLase femtosecond flaps", J Refract Surg, 23, pp.555~558 (2007)
  14. Chen HJ, "Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of flap thickness after myopic LASIK using the Moria one use plus microkeratome", J Refract Surg, 26, pp.403~410 (2010)
  15. 김희중, "인트라라식 후 빛간섭단층촬영계로 측정한 각막절편 두께의 재현성 평가", 대한안과학회지, 48(12), pp.1630~1635 (2007), 대한안과학회
  16. Friedlaender M, "LASIK surgery using the IntraLase femtosecond laser", Int Ophthamol Clin, 46, pp.145~153 (2006)
  17. Cheng AC, "Measurement of LASIK flap thickness with anterior segment optical coherence tomography", J Refract Surg, 24, pp.879~884 (2008)
  18. Li EY, "Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness", Ophthalmology, 114, pp.1842~1847 (2007)
  19. Zhao PS, "Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry", Am J Ophthalmol, 143, pp.1047~1049 (2007)
  20. Wildner K, "Comparison of the corneal thickness as measured by Visante anterior segment OCT versus ultrasound technique", Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 224, pp.832~836 (2007)
  21. Li Y, "A longitudinal study of LASIK flap and stromal thickness with high-speed optical coherence tomography", Ophthalmology, 114, pp.1124~1132 (2007)
  22. Nagy ZZ, "Ultrasound evaluation of flap thickness, ablation depth, and corneal edema after laser in situ keratomileusis", J Refract Surg, 20, pp.279~281 (2004)
  23. Thomas J, "Comparison of corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, ultrasonic pachymetry, and a scanning slit method", J Refract Surg, 22, pp.671~678 (2006)
  24. Dawson DG, "Ex vivo confocal microscopy of human LASIK corneas with histologic and ultrastructural correlation", Ophthalmology, 112, pp.634~644 (2005)
  25. Wylegała E, "Anterior segment imaging: Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus time-domain optical coherence tomography", J Cataract Refract Surg, 35, pp.1410~1414 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)