본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Pension Politics in Korea after Democratization: The Failed Attempts of Party Politics and Social Dialogue

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This analysis of Korean pension politics under the Roh Moo-hyun administration focuses on the roles and limitations of party politics and social dialogue as institutional intermediaries between the state and civil society. It suggests that the social policy reform was made through formal democratic systems but without some of the essential elements of democracy. Although each political party admitted pension problems suggested by civil society during the initial stage of agenda formation, the final decision was made through negotiations among the political parties and government bureaucracy. In making decisions, there was no room to discuss the positions of labor, capital or other social groups. The political parties did not provide a channel for civil society’s positions to be reflected in National Assembly discussions. On the other hand, an attempt at social dialogue was initiated by the new ruling elite. Although various interest groups displayed the possibility of agreement, the process of social dialogue was stopped by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Even after democratization, bureaucracy affected party politics and dominated social dialogue as Korean pension politics lacked institutional communication between the state and civil society.

Abstract

This analysis of Korean pension politics under the Roh Moo-hyun administration focuses on the roles and limitations of party politics and social dialogue as institutional intermediaries between the state and civil society. It suggests that the social policy reform was made through formal democratic systems but without some of the essential elements of democracy. Although each political party admitted pension problems suggested by civil society during the initial stage of agenda formation, the final decision was made through negotiations among the political parties and government bureaucracy. In making decisions, there was no room to discuss the positions of labor, capital or other social groups. The political parties did not provide a channel for civil society’s positions to be reflected in National Assembly discussions. On the other hand, an attempt at social dialogue was initiated by the new ruling elite. Although various interest groups displayed the possibility of agreement, the process of social dialogue was stopped by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Even after democratization, bureaucracy affected party politics and dominated social dialogue as Korean pension politics lacked institutional communication between the state and civil society.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Anderson, James, "Public Policy Making" (1975), Thomas Nelson and Sons Limited
  2. Anderson, Karen, "Pension Reform in Sweden: Radical Reform in a Mature Pension System. in: Ageing and Pension Reform around the World" (2005), Edward Elgar
  3. Bonoli, Giuliano, "The Politics of Pension Reform" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  4. Choi, Jang-Jip, "Democracy after Democratization" (2005), Humanitas
  5. Committee for the Development of National Pension, "Financial Projection and Reform Plans of National Pension 2003" (2003), Committee for the Development of National Pension
  6. 은수미, "노동운동 거듭나기위기 속의 정치세력화, 그후?", 경제와 사회, 67(67), pp.137~170 (2005), 비판사회학회
  7. 김영순, "민주화와 복지정치의 변화:국민기초생활보장법 제정과정을 중심으로", 한국과 국제정치, 21(3), pp.97~126 (2005), 극동문제연구소
  8. Korpi, Walter, "The Democratic Class Struggle" (1983), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  9. Kwon, Huck-ju, "Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia", Development and Change, 36, pp.477~497 (2005)
  10. Pierson, Paul, "The New Politics of the Welfare Politics", World Politics, 48(2), pp.143~179 (1996)
  11. Republic of Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare, "2005 noin bokji saeop jichim", ~ (2005)
  12. Republic of Korea, Office for Government Policy Coordination, "Materials on National Pension Reform Produced by the Supporting Organization for the Joint Meeting on Low Birth Rate and Aging Population", ~ (2006)
  13. Reynaud, Emmanuel, "Social Dialogue and Pension Reform" (2000), ILO
  14. Seong, Kyoung-Ryung, "Consolidation of Democracy and the Development of the Welfare State. in: The Debates on Charasteristic of Korean Welfare State" (2002), Human and Welfare Books
  15. Wong, Joseph, "Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea" (2004), Cornell University Press
  16. Yang, Jae-jin, "Democratic Governance and Bureaucratic Politics: A Case of Pension Reform in Korea", Policy and Politics, 32(2), pp.193~206 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)