Several Present Conditions Defining 100 Years of Japan’s Annexation of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are two approaches to questioning the 100th anniversary since Japan’s annexation of Korea. One is to seek ways of overcoming colonialism by duly understanding the process of colonial domination from its outset through the present. Another approach is to position Japan’s annexation of Korea in current circumstances. This study has opted for the second approach. Over the past 100 years, conditions surrounding the matter of Japan’s colonial domination have noticeably changed. Above all, changes in the circumstances defining the relationships between Korea and Japan made inevitable the mention of colonial domination amidst other issues. From the Korean perspective, the fact that what was a single entity 100 years ago has been divided into two is the most fundamental change that has occurred. With this as a starting point, the current paper proposes to address three factors present in the 100 years following Japan’s annexation of Korea. First, the Japanese government’s apologetic statement for colonial domination is combined with the conception of an East Asian community. Second, the framework of perceiving the Korea-Japan relationship and the East Asian community should have a common ground. Lastly, the author also viewed the emergence of China as an essential reason for changes in order of the region in East Asia and the principal condition in defining the present state of affairs.
Abstract
There are two approaches to questioning the 100th anniversary since Japan’s annexation of Korea. One is to seek ways of overcoming colonialism by duly understanding the process of colonial domination from its outset through the present. Another approach is to position Japan’s annexation of Korea in current circumstances. This study has opted for the second approach. Over the past 100 years, conditions surrounding the matter of Japan’s colonial domination have noticeably changed. Above all, changes in the circumstances defining the relationships between Korea and Japan made inevitable the mention of colonial domination amidst other issues. From the Korean perspective, the fact that what was a single entity 100 years ago has been divided into two is the most fundamental change that has occurred. With this as a starting point, the current paper proposes to address three factors present in the 100 years following Japan’s annexation of Korea. First, the Japanese government’s apologetic statement for colonial domination is combined with the conception of an East Asian community. Second, the framework of perceiving the Korea-Japan relationship and the East Asian community should have a common ground. Lastly, the author also viewed the emergence of China as an essential reason for changes in order of the region in East Asia and the principal condition in defining the present state of affairs.
참고문헌 (30)
- Kang Jin A, "Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century" (2009), Gil Publishing
- Bae, Geung-Chan, "The Process of Development in East Asian Regional Cooperation. in: The East Asian Community and the Future of Korea" (2009), Imagine
- Baek, Seung Wook, "Lecture on History of Capitalism" (2006), Greenbee Publishers
- 백낙청, "'동아시아공동체' 구상과 한반도: 일본의 한국병탄 100주년을 맞아", 역사비평, 92(92), pp.229~249 (2010), 역사문제연구소
- Cho, Young Nam, "China’s Road in the 21st Century" (2009), Nanam
- Chun, Sung-Heung, "The Development of Chinese Capitalism and Its Position in World Politics", Social Science Studies, 13(2) (2005)
- "The “Chongqing Experience” in Progress: The Universal Significance of the Chongqing Experience" (2010)[URL]
- Fan, Wei, "Contemporary Chinese System. in: Chinese Model" (2009), Zhongyang Fanyi Chubanshe
- 전형권, "동북아 지역협력과 초국가 거버넌스의 등장 - 두만강유역개발계획(TRADP)을 중심으로 -", 국제정치논총, 46(4), pp.179~202 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
- 강진아, "동아시아로 다시 쓴 세계사―포머란츠와 캘리포니아 학파", 역사비평, 82(82), pp.235~265 (2008), 역사문제연구소
- 강성호, "‘전 지구적’ 세계체제로 본 세계사와 동아시아사―안드레 군더 프랑크", 역사비평, 82(82), pp.216~234 (2008), 역사문제연구소
- Kim, Kee Seok, "Regionalism in East Asia in the 1990s and Korea-Japan Relationships", Social Science Studies, 46(1), pp.6~8 (2007)
- Kim, Kee Seok, "Conception of New Community and New Asian Diplomacy", JPI Policy Forum (2010)
- Koo, Kab-Woo, "Criticism of International Relations Science" (2008), Humanitas
- Lee, Jae Hyon, "(East Asian Regional Cooperation and Leadership. in: East Asian Community and The Future of Korea" (2009), Imagine
- 이문기, "WTO시대 중국의 발전패러다임 수정과 ‘중국모델’ 의 모색", 동아연구, 54(54), pp.81~121 (2008), 동아연구소
- "North Korea-China Economic Cooperation and Economy of the Korean peninsula" (2010)[URL]
- Lee, Namju, "A Dual Project View" (2009), Changbi Publishers
- Lee, Namju, "Spearheading the East Asian Community and Ways of Overcoming Nationalism. in: The Status and View of Discussion on East Asian Community" (2009), Northeast Asia History Foundation
- Lee, Sook-Jong, "Korean, Chinese, and Japanese Perceptions of East Asia and East Asian Community Policy. in: The Status and Future Implications of Discussions on the East Asian Community" (2009), Northeast Asia History Foundation
- Na, Jongseok, "The Issue of Shaping of Identity of the East Asian Community. in: The Status and View of Discussion on East Asian Community" (2009), Northeast Asia History Foundation
- Ramo, Joshua Cooper, "The Beijing Consensus" (2004), Foreign Policy Center
- 류준필, "분단체제론과 동아시아론", 아세아연구, 52(4), pp.38~72 (2009), 아세아문제연구소
- Sakamoto, Yoshikatsu, "The Significance of the East Asian Community in the 21st Century", Creation and Criticism, 136 (2009)
- 신윤환, "동남아의 지역주의와 “동아시아 공동체”: 그 역사에 대한 재해석", 동아연구, 56(56), pp.107~137 (2009), 동아연구소
- "Bo Xilai, the New Deal And Chongqing Model" (2010)[URL]
- Wada, Haruki, "Common House of East Asia" (2004), Ilchokak Publishing Co
- Yao, Yang, "Can China’s Model of Authoritarian Growth Survive?. in: Foreign Affairs" (2010)
- Yi, Seong-Woo, "Development of the Tumen River Area and Prospects for Multilateral Cooperation in East Asia", JPI Policy Forum (2010)
- Japan, "Asia", pp.2010, Yonetani, Masafumi