본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Public Diplomacy: Reappraising the South Korean Case through an Evolutionary Approach

Muzaffar S. ABDUAZIMOV
한국학중앙연구원 (The Academy of Korean Studies)|2017.09|Korea Journal|제57권 제3호|pp. 83-111|DOI 10.25024/kj.2017.57.3.83

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

public diplomacysoft powerdiversificationpolycentrismoriginsin - stitutionalization
주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Despite a rising academic interest in South Korea’s public diplomacy, little is known about its origins and evolution. Most existing studies have focused on the modern period of South Korea’s public diplomacy, in particular the government’s new foreign policy agenda since the late 2000s. Contrary to popular belief, this article argues that the recent infiltration of public diplomacy into South Korea’s foreign policy represents de jure intensification of activities that de facto have been practiced from the second half of the 20th century. The present research divides the evolution of South Korea’s public diplomacy into four periods: origins, diversification, polycentrism, and institutionalization. Each period has its own specific patterns, ends, and means. For instance, whereas the origins period arose with cultural and sports diplomacies, diversification included specific areas of engagement with foreign publics through official development assistance, knowledge, and exchange diplomacies. In turn, polycentrism has structurally transformed public diplomacy from a solely state-led activity into a polycentric framework of public and private partnership. Lastly, the institutionalization period represents the government’s recent efforts to establish a universal coordinative authority above its public diplomacy, which represents a fragmented set of activities conducted by various governmental institutions.

Abstract

Despite a rising academic interest in South Korea’s public diplomacy, little is known about its origins and evolution. Most existing studies have focused on the modern period of South Korea’s public diplomacy, in particular the government’s new foreign policy agenda since the late 2000s. Contrary to popular belief, this article argues that the recent infiltration of public diplomacy into South Korea’s foreign policy represents de jure intensification of activities that de facto have been practiced from the second half of the 20th century. The present research divides the evolution of South Korea’s public diplomacy into four periods: origins, diversification, polycentrism, and institutionalization. Each period has its own specific patterns, ends, and means. For instance, whereas the origins period arose with cultural and sports diplomacies, diversification included specific areas of engagement with foreign publics through official development assistance, knowledge, and exchange diplomacies. In turn, polycentrism has structurally transformed public diplomacy from a solely state-led activity into a polycentric framework of public and private partnership. Lastly, the institutionalization period represents the government’s recent efforts to establish a universal coordinative authority above its public diplomacy, which represents a fragmented set of activities conducted by various governmental institutions.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. Armstrong, Matthew C, "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy" (2009), Routledge
  2. Cairncross, Frances., "The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Is Changing Our Lives" (1997), Harvard Business School Press
  3. 조혜정, "Reading the ＂Korean Wave＂ as a Sign of Global Shift", Korea Journal, 45(4), pp.147~182 (2005), 유네스코한국위원회
  4. 조윤영, "Public Diplomacy and South Korea’s Strategies", The Korean Journal of International Studies, 10(2), pp.275~296 (2012), 한국국제정치학회
  5. Committee for International Development Cooperation, "Korea’s Official Development Assistance White Paper 2014" (2014), CIDC
  6. Cowan, Geoffrey, "Moving From Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.10~30 (2008)
  7. Cull, Nicholas J., "Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.31~54 (2008)
  8. Cull, Nicholas J., "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy" (2009), Routledge
  9. Dal, Yong Jin, "Hallyu 2.0: The New Korean Wave in Creative Industry", International Institute Journal, 2(1), pp.3~7 (2012)
  10. De Ceuster, Koen, "Pride and Prejudice in South Korea’s Foreign Policy", Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 21, pp.64~90 (2005)
  11. d’Hooghe, Ingrid, "China’s Public Diplomacy" (2015), Brill Nijhoff
  12. Duffield, John S., "What Are International Institutions?", International Studies Review, 9(1), pp.1~22 (2007)
  13. Fardoust, Shahrokh, "Postcrisis Growth and Development: A Development Agenda for the G-20", pp.1~62 (2011), World Bank
  14. Gregory, Bruce, "American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation", Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 6(3, pp.4) (2011), 351~372
  15. Heller, Ken S, "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy", pp.225~232 (2009), Routledge
  16. HERMANNSHEIKE DOROIHEE, "National Role Conceptions in the ‘Global Korea’ Foreign Policy Strategy", The Korean Journal of International Studies, 11(1), pp.55~82 (2013), 한국국제정치학회
  17. Hong, Kiwon., "Cultural Policies in East Asia: Dynamics between the States, Arts, and Creative Industries 중 Chapter4. Nation Branding of Korea", pp.69~84 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  18. FCO Public Diplomacy: The Olympic and Paralympic Games 2012, "House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee", Foreign Affairs Committee, ~ (2011)
  19. Jang, Gunjoo, "Korean Wave as Tool for Korea’s New Cultural Diplomacy", Advances in Applied Sociology, 2(3), pp.196~202 (2012)
  20. Kalinowski, Thomas, "Korea’s Search for a Global Role between Hard Economic Interests and Soft Power", European Journal of Development Research, 24(2), pp.242~260 (2012)
  21. Kelley, John R., "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy", pp.72~85 (2009), Routledge
  22. "Non-State Actors" (2015)[URL]
  23. Kinsey, Dennis F., "National Image of South Korea:Implications for Public Diplomacy", Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 4(1), pp.1~12 (2013)
  24. 김은미, "South Korean Culture Goes Global : K-Pop and the Korean Wave", Korean Social Science Journal, 34(1), pp.117~152 (2007), 한국사회과학협의회
  25. Kim, Regina., "2010 SAIS U.S.-Korea Yearbook", pp.147~162 (2011), U.S.-Korea Institute at SAIS
  26. "Global Korea: Broadening Korea’s Diplomatic Horizons" (2012)[URL]
  27. Taehwan Kim, "Paradigm Shift in Diplomacy: A Conceptual Model for Korea’s “New Public Diplomacy”", Korea Observer, 43(4), pp.527~555 (2012), 한국학술연구원
  28. Korea Foundation, "KF Brochure", Korea Foundation, ~ (2013)
  29. "The Sixth KF Global Seminar: Korea’s Role in Global Public Diplomacy" (2013)[URL]
  30. "Who We Are" (2013)[URL]
  31. 2014 Annual Report of the Korea Foundation, "Korea Foundation", KF, ~ (2014)
  32. 2015 Annual Report of the Korea Foundation, "Korea Foundation", KF, ~ (2015)
  33. "Survey on Economic Effect of Korean Wave and Its Utilization of Korean Enterprises" (2012)[URL]
  34. Korea International Cooperation Agency, "1991–2010: 20 Years of KOICA", KOICA, ~ (2011)
  35. "’Korean Wave’ Shows a Way to ‘Export’" (2011)[URL]
  36. "Visitor Arrivals, Korean Departures, Int’l Tourism Receipts & Expenditures" (2015)[URL]
  37. "Televised Constructions of the Seoul Olympic Ceremony in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States" (1989)[URL]
  38. Lee, Yun-Taek., "World Cup 2002: Korea and Japan Partnering for the 21st Century", Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 6(1), pp.66~69 (2002)
  39. Lee, Sook-jong., "Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia", pp.139~161 (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
  40. South Korea as New Middle Power Seeking Complex Diplomacy, "Lee, Sook-jong", East Asia Institute, ~ (2012)
  41. "Korea’s Public Diplomacy Needs Better Coordination and Strategies" (2015)[URL]
  42. Lee, Sook-jong, "Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia 2015 : Middle Power Democracies and Emerging Powers in a Troubled Region", pp.107~130 (2015), Palgrave MacMillan
  43. Lee, Hye-Kyung, "The Korean Wave: Korean Media Go Global", pp.185~198 (2013), Routledge
  44. "How Korea Became the World’s Coolest Brand" (2014)[URL]
  45. Lim, Tania., "East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave", pp.33~52 (2008), Hong Kong University Press
  46. "Understanding Transnational Korea through Hallyu: Resilience of Developmentalism in the 21st Century" (2016)[URL]
  47. "Korean TV Show Sparks Chicken and Beer Craze in China" (2014)[URL]
  48. Ma, Young Sam, "Korea’s Public Diplomacy:A New Initiative for the Future", Asan Institute for Policy Studies, 39, pp.1~25 (2012)
  49. Manheim, Jarol B, "Rites of Passage: The 1988 Seoul Olympics as Public Diplomacy", Western Political Quarterly, 43(2), pp.279~295 (1990)
  50. Melissen, Jan, "The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations", pp.3~27 (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
  51. Melissen, Jan, "Leveraging Middle Power Public Diplomacy in East Asian International Relations" (2015), East Asia Institute
  52. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea, "Diplomatic White Paper 2014" (2014), MOFA
  53. "ODA/Development Cooperation" (2015)[URL]
  54. Nye, Joseph S., "Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics" (2004), Public Affairs
  55. Park, Mi Sook, "South Korea Cultural History between 1960s and 2012", International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, pp.171~118 (2015)
  56. Pratkanis, Anthony, "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy", pp.111~153 (2009), Routledge
  57. Rivenburgh, Nancy., "The Olympic Games, Media and the Challenges of Global Image Making" (2004), International Chair in Olympism
  58. "The Campaign to Make You Eat Kimchi" (2016)[URL]
  59. Schmuck, Alena, "Korea: Politics, Economy and Society", pp.91~117 (2011), Brill
  60. Shim, Doobo., "East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave", pp.15~32 (2008), Hong Kong University Press
  61. Snow, Nancy, "Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy", pp.3~11 (2009), Routledge
  62. Sung, Keuk Je., "Development Experience of the Korean Economy", pp.11~20 (2010), Kyung Hee University Press
  63. Szondi, Georgy, "Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences" (2008), Clingendael
  64. Temporal, Paul., "Branding for the Public Sector: Creating, Building and Managing Brands People Will Value" (2015), Wiley
  65. "Remarks by President Obama and President Park of South Korea in a Joint Press Conference" (2013)[URL]
  66. Iain Watson, "South Korea's State-led Soft Power Strategies: Limits on Inter-Korean Relations", Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(3), pp.304~325 (2013), 서울대학교행정대학원
  67. Walsh, John., "The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context", pp.13~32 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  68. Yim, Haksoon., "Cultural Identity and Cultural Policy in South Korea", International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), pp.37~48 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Non-state actors in Colombia: Developers of Korean Cultural diplomacy송영, Bravo Cardenas Emil Zurahyt국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2025 · 제32권 제1호Knowledge-Sharing as Middle Power’s New Public Diplomacy: The Case of Korea’s Higher Education ODA박한규한국사회과학협의회 · Korean Social Science Journal2023 · 제50권 제2호Hallyu, Public Diplomacy, and Development Cooperation: Korea’s Cultural Diplomacy Concocted for Africa김수원국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2021 · 제28권 제2호Why Do We Need Non-state Actors in Public Diplomacy?: Theoretical Discussion of Relational, Networked and Collaborative Public Diplomacy이근, Kadir Ayhan국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2015 · 제22권 제1호한국의 對중국 공공외교 전략과 실행 분석백우열극동문제연구소 · 한국과 국제정치2015 · 제31권 제3호한국 공공외교 전략 및 정책 연구: 기초적 유형의 개념화백우열세종연구소 · 국가전략2017 · 제23권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Red Capital, Colonial Eyes: Moscow as Seen by Korean Intellectuals in the 1920s–1930s박노자pp. 5-30Public Administration and the Laws of Silla from the 3rd–5th Centuries김창석pp. 31-55Mode of Cinematic Plagiarism and Adaptation: How Ishizaka Yojiro’s Novels Launched Korean Youth Film정종화pp. 56-82A Study on the Characteristics of Hanok Gates from a Cultural Landscape Perspective: Focusing on the Hanok Gates of Three Traditional Korean Villages in Gyeongsang-do Province박종구, 안은희pp. 112-140Can One Enchant in theGanpan Republic? Reading the Korean Signscapes through the Theories of Enchantment백승한pp. 141-165
원문 보기