국어 로마자 표기법에 나타난 문제점과 개선 방안
The Points at Issue and Betterments on Korean Romanisation System
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to review and compare the past six Romanisation drafts of Korean since the Mccune-Reischauer in 1939 and Korea's single Hangeul notation, which is based on the mutual agreement, and then puts the main changes of each revised alphabet system. Especially, this paper demonstrates a deep comparison between '84 system and the new one. The results of investigation show that the new system is operated by the Korean writing system and not by the English one, which is quite different from the past Romanisations. And in the PC-Internet period, also the new one enables everyone to read and write Latin letters easily instead of using diacritical marks. The findings are as follows. 1. Korean consonants have no voicing on the plosives of the syllable initials, but English ones have voicing. Reflecting this, ㄱ, ㄷ, ㅂ, ㅈ, syllable initials of Hangeul substitute for Latin letters g, d, b, j respectively regardless of voicing. Latin s always stands for ㅅ without the position of ㅅ by the new notation. In previous ones, Latin sh represents ㅅ before ㅣ. Also, k', t', p', ch' of the previous one are changed into k(ㅋ), t(ㅌ), p(ㅍ), ch(ㅊ) without aspiration mark, apostrophe('). 2. As for vowel letters, Latin letter e in case of eu(ㅡ) and eo(ㅓ) is replaced into the micron(ˇ) over o and u in such as ŭ and ŏ. In conclusion, 7 Roman letters of the 40 letters that are used for Korean correspondences have shown variability whenever the system was revised. Others such as letter by letter or sound unit by sound unit have not been unchanged and in consistency since it was set up. Caution is needed in the future implementation of Romanisation in that it should fully take into account of predictability of people’s language use in order not to waste money due to unprepared policy.
Abstract
This paper is to review and compare the past six Romanisation drafts of Korean since the Mccune-Reischauer in 1939 and Korea's single Hangeul notation, which is based on the mutual agreement, and then puts the main changes of each revised alphabet system. Especially, this paper demonstrates a deep comparison between '84 system and the new one. The results of investigation show that the new system is operated by the Korean writing system and not by the English one, which is quite different from the past Romanisations. And in the PC-Internet period, also the new one enables everyone to read and write Latin letters easily instead of using diacritical marks. The findings are as follows. 1. Korean consonants have no voicing on the plosives of the syllable initials, but English ones have voicing. Reflecting this, ㄱ, ㄷ, ㅂ, ㅈ, syllable initials of Hangeul substitute for Latin letters g, d, b, j respectively regardless of voicing. Latin s always stands for ㅅ without the position of ㅅ by the new notation. In previous ones, Latin sh represents ㅅ before ㅣ. Also, k', t', p', ch' of the previous one are changed into k(ㅋ), t(ㅌ), p(ㅍ), ch(ㅊ) without aspiration mark, apostrophe('). 2. As for vowel letters, Latin letter e in case of eu(ㅡ) and eo(ㅓ) is replaced into the micron(ˇ) over o and u in such as ŭ and ŏ. In conclusion, 7 Roman letters of the 40 letters that are used for Korean correspondences have shown variability whenever the system was revised. Others such as letter by letter or sound unit by sound unit have not been unchanged and in consistency since it was set up. Caution is needed in the future implementation of Romanisation in that it should fully take into account of predictability of people’s language use in order not to waste money due to unprepared policy.
참고문헌 (39)
- 국립국어연구원, "현 국어 로마자 표기법" (2000)
- 국어문화연구소, "로마자 표기 용례집" (2000), 보고사
- 강용순, "한국인에게 어려운 영어 발음" (2007), 경진 문화사
- 권영규, "영어 발달사" (1985), 형설출판사
- 고창운, "한글 맞춤법 해설과 이해" (2006), 경진 문화사
- 김명숙, "영어 철자 발음의 연계를 위한 연구", 영어 영문학, 46, pp.383~408 (2000)
- 김영하, "I Love English 로마자 표기법2" (2000), 버들 미디어
- 김재정, "2010 PASSTORY 9급 재정국어" (2009), 웅진 패스원
- 김주현, "스탠더드 영한사전" (1991), 성문각
- 김충배, "우리말 로마자 표기 문제", 언어, 3, pp.71~85 (1978)
- 나채운, "바로잡기 우리 말 101가지" (2009), 경진 문화사
- 목포시장, "Mokpo Regional Collection Hall" (1997), 전일 실업 출판사
- "문교부 제88-1호, 한글맞춤법", ~ (1989)
- "문교부 제88-2호, 표준어 규정", ~ (1988)
- "문교부 제84-1호, 국어 로마자 표기법", ~ (1984)
- "문화 체육부 제1995-8호, 외래어 표기법", ~ (1995)
- 박종덕, "국어 교육을 위한 국어 음운학" (2008), 경진 문화사
- 배재덕, "영어 음성학과 발음 교육" (2009), 논문의 집
- 배재덕, "생활 문자들" (2007), 논문의 집
- 배재덕, "문화간의 의사소통" (2003), 논문의 집
- 배재덕, "言語․文字․文化" (2001), 논문의 집
- 서경, "장백산 혼" (2007), 길림 촬영 출판사
- 서정범, "음운의 국어사적 연구" (1982), 집문당
- 유만근, "표준 한국어 정밀 표음 로마자 맞춤법 연구", 언어, 10, pp.171~202 (1985)
- 전홍식, "국어 표기법에 관한 연구", 외국어 연구, 13, pp.27~44 (2000), 성심 외국어 대학 외국어 교육 연구소
- 정태충, "정음로마자 표기법" (2005), 경희대학교 출판부
- 조두상, "로마 철자 및 영문 표기 실태 연구", 영미어문학, 38, pp.179~199 (1998)
- 조성식, "영어학 사전", pp.1221~1224 (1990), 신아사
- 조오현, "북한 언어문화의 이해" (2005), 경진 문화사
- 최호철, "외국인의 한국어 연구" (2005), 경진 문화사
- 허웅, "언어학" (1981), 샘 문화사
- Baugh. A.C., "A History of the English Language" (2002), Prentice Hall
- "Handbook of the International Phonetic Association" (2001), Cambridge Univ Press
- Gyeongju National Museum, "Art Hall" (2002), Tongcheon Publishing Co.
- Harvey, J., "Korean Romanization: The McCune-Reischauer System", The Korean Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 38 (1961)
- Jones. D., "An English Pronouncing Dictionary" (1924), Maruzen Co. LTD
- Kahn, D., "Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology" (1976), IULC
- Nahm, A. C., "A Panorama of 5000 Years: Korean History" (2004), HOLLYM
- Vallins, G. H., "Spelling" (1965), UK Tonbridge Printers