소암 임숙영 변려문의 서유체적 특징 연구(1) − 예비적 검토를 중심으로 −

Abstract

This study intended to analyze the literary characteristics of 17th century's Pianliwen on the basis of Nam Yong-ik’ 「Comment of Liwen(儷評)」. In the 17th century, Pianliwen was created and enjoyed by some writers with the Song·Yuan’ Pianliwen. We can check the the Song·Yuan’ Pianliwen by compiling the collection of Pianliwen. And Seoyuche Pianliwen can analyze its features based on the works mentioned in Liwen(儷評). So, I looked at the collection of Pianliwen and found the characteristics of the Joseon Dynasty’s Pianliwen by comparing Lee Jeong-Gui with the writings of Su-shi(蘇軾). And I compared the writings of Yushin(庾信) and Im Sook-young about Seoyuche Pianliwen. Im Sook-young selected by Nam Yoo-yong has eight articles, including the 「Tonggoonjung-seo(統軍亭序)」, 「Yeonkwangjun-gseo(練光亭 序)」. I took three of these and examined the Seoyuche Pianliwen features. In contrast to the sentences of Song·Yuan’ Pianliwen, Lim Suk Young’s Pianliwen shows that the Seoyuche Pianliwen was created and enjoyed. Thus, just as the Dang·Song and Chin·Han dynasty classical literature transformed in ancient text to enrich the literary world, it was intended to confirm the changes that occurred in the Pianliwen at that time. Based on this, the second paper will reveal why Cha Cheon-ro and Lim Sook-young wrote the Seoyuche Pianliwen. And I will study whether there is a writer who connects them and the metaphors of the two characters. Through these studies, we will be able to see what the formality of the Seoyuche Pianliwen means in the history of literature.