桐城派 문인들의 騈儷文 인식에 관한 一考

Abstract

Considering that there are no previous studies on the recognition of Tongchengpai writers toward the Pianliwen in Korea, the primary purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions and attitudes of Tongchengpai writers toward the Pianliwen in early and mid-term, referring to previous studies abroad. First of all, through this study, I confirmed that there are two different perceptions of the Pianliwen among former and middle-aged Tongchengpai writers. Fangbao, Guantong and Wudexuan rejected the Pianliwen, emphasizing pure Guwen writing. On the other hand, Liudakui and Yaonai maintain a certain critical attitude toward the Pianliwen, but they acknowledges some of the value of it in his work creation and criticism. Afterwards, Meizengliang, FangDongsu, and Liukai directly created Pianliwen and had a positive perception and attitude toward the Pianliwen. Next, this paper confirms that the recognition and attitude of Tongchengpai writers toward the Pianliwen changed from negative to gradually positive from early-term to the middle-term. The process of this perception change is very important. The reason for this is not only that the change in the perception of the Pianliwen by Tongchengpai writers reflects the external cause of the rise of the Pianliwen in the 乾隆、嘉慶 period. More importantly, the change in the perception of the Pianliwen by the Tongchengpai writers early-term to the middle-term can be said to be the process of absorbing the style expression of Pianliwen into Prose.