본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의문문에 있어서의 반복언어화(응답발화를 중심으로)

Repetition in the Questions - with Focus on Responses -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper analyzes the phenomena of repetition and ellipsis in the response of the interrogative sentences in view of informational structure. The results of the study show that in the responses of positive-negative interrogatives, presupposed information cannot be deleted and that the information that cannot be deleted is not allowed to be repeated. Propositions of the speakers were studied with respect to three elements: 1) proposition-building, 2) proposition-adding, 3) space-establishing. The repetition process is obligatory in 1) and 2) while it is arbitrary in 3). In WH-questions, the focus of the questions is always placed on the identified part indicated as an interrogative and this question part should be answered, so the problem of the word-order recognition does not arise. Also, in de(で)-case constituent, unlike positive-negative questions, repetition process is arbitrary as it is not the main focus of the question. As regards the other elements, the same phenomena as in positive-negative questions have been observed. Adverbs of manners and attitudes are divided in two types on the basis of whether repetition is obligatory or not. Also it was found that repetition the repetition is not obligatory in the case of space-establishing adverbs of quality.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the phenomena of repetition and ellipsis in the response of the interrogative sentences in view of informational structure. The results of the study show that in the responses of positive-negative interrogatives, presupposed information cannot be deleted and that the information that cannot be deleted is not allowed to be repeated. Propositions of the speakers were studied with respect to three elements: 1) proposition-building, 2) proposition-adding, 3) space-establishing. The repetition process is obligatory in 1) and 2) while it is arbitrary in 3). In WH-questions, the focus of the questions is always placed on the identified part indicated as an interrogative and this question part should be answered, so the problem of the word-order recognition does not arise. Also, in de(で)-case constituent, unlike positive-negative questions, repetition process is arbitrary as it is not the main focus of the question. As regards the other elements, the same phenomena as in positive-negative questions have been observed. Adverbs of manners and attitudes are divided in two types on the basis of whether repetition is obligatory or not. Also it was found that repetition the repetition is not obligatory in the case of space-establishing adverbs of quality.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 大谷博美, "ハとガとø ハとヲとø 日本語類似表現の文法(上)", pp.287~295 (1995), くろしお出版
  2. 金京浩, "省略과 復元의 問題", 일본어문학, 16, pp.1~20 (2001), 일본어문학회
  3. 김경호, "情報知識과 省略關係", 일본어문학, (29), pp.41~64 (2005), 일본어문학회
  4. 김경호, "主語의 言語化와 非言語化- 1․2人稱을 中心으로 -", 일어일문학, (29), pp.1~15 (2006), 대한일어일문학회
  5. 김경호, "情報構造에서 보는 非言語化와 反復言語化", 일본어문학, (37), pp.1~26 (2007), 일본어문학회
  6. 金昌圭, "格助詞省略説의 再考", 일어일문학연구, 19, pp.57~83 (1991), 한국일어일문학회
  7. 清水佳子, "NPはとø(NPは)日本語類義表現の文法(下)", pp.647~654 (1995), くろしお出版
  8. 砂川有里子, "主語の省略と非省略", pp.15~34 (1990), 筑波大学
  9. 高見健一, "日英語対象研究シリーズ(4)機能的構文論による日英語比較ー受身文、後置文の分析ー", pp.77~94 (1995), くろしお出版
  10. 丹羽哲也, "無助詞格の機能", 国語国文, 58(10), pp.38~57 (1989), 京都大学
  11. 長谷川ユリ, "話し言葉における無助詞の機能", 日本語教育, 80, pp.158~168 (1993)
  12. 畠弘巳, "文とは何か -主語の省略とその働き-", 日本語教育, 41, pp.198~208 (1980)
  13. 牧野成一, "繰り返しの文法", pp.67~74 (1980), くろしお出版
  14. 丸山直子, "話し言葉における無助詞格成分の格", 計量国語学, 19­8, pp.365~380 (1995)
  15. 久野 暲, "日本文法研究", pp.219~236 (1973), 大修館書店
  16. 久野 暲, "談話の文法", pp.114~123 (1978), 大修館

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (38건)