Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The quality of bowel preparation is one of the quality indicators for colonoscopy. The aim of this study was tocompare the efficacy of oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-AA) for bowel preparation. Methods: The study involved 167 patients who underwent diagnostic colonoscopies. Inadequate bowel preparation was definedas any score of ≤1 in each colon section based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Multivariate logistic regression was used tocompare the efficacy of OSS and PEG-AA. Subgroup analyses were performed based on patient characteristics. Results: Overall, 106 (63.5%) patients received OSS, and 61 (36.5%) patients received PEG-AA. The rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 12.3% in patients receiving OSS and 32.8% in patients receiving PEG-AA (p=0.001). OSS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26; p=0.003) and morning examination (OR=0.11; p=0.038) were significantly associated with efficient bowel preparation. The efficacyof OSS compared with PEG-AA was only significant in patients ≥50 years of age vs. <50 years of age (OR=0.13; p=0.001 vs. OR=0.96; p=0.959) and female vs. male patients (OR=0.06; p=0.002 vs. OR=0.58; p=0.339). Conclusions: OSS was significantly more efficient for bowel preparation than PEG-AA, especially in patients ≥50 years of age and female patients. Morning examination led to a good quality of bowel preparation, irrespective of the preparation regimen.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The quality of bowel preparation is one of the quality indicators for colonoscopy. The aim of this study was tocompare the efficacy of oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-AA) for bowel preparation. Methods: The study involved 167 patients who underwent diagnostic colonoscopies. Inadequate bowel preparation was definedas any score of ≤1 in each colon section based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Multivariate logistic regression was used tocompare the efficacy of OSS and PEG-AA. Subgroup analyses were performed based on patient characteristics. Results: Overall, 106 (63.5%) patients received OSS, and 61 (36.5%) patients received PEG-AA. The rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 12.3% in patients receiving OSS and 32.8% in patients receiving PEG-AA (p=0.001). OSS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26; p=0.003) and morning examination (OR=0.11; p=0.038) were significantly associated with efficient bowel preparation. The efficacyof OSS compared with PEG-AA was only significant in patients ≥50 years of age vs. <50 years of age (OR=0.13; p=0.001 vs. OR=0.96; p=0.959) and female vs. male patients (OR=0.06; p=0.002 vs. OR=0.58; p=0.339). Conclusions: OSS was significantly more efficient for bowel preparation than PEG-AA, especially in patients ≥50 years of age and female patients. Morning examination led to a good quality of bowel preparation, irrespective of the preparation regimen.
참고문헌 (28)
- Inadomi JM, "Screening for colorectal neoplasia", N Engl J Med, 376, pp.149~156 (2017)
- Johnson DA, "Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy : recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 147, pp.903~924 (2014)
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Bowel preparation before colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.781~794 (2015)
- Solad Y, "Influence of colonoscopy quality measures on patients’ colonoscopist selection", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.215~219 (2015)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)
- 홍성노, "The Effect of the Bowel Preparation Status on the Risk of Missing Polyp and Adenoma during Screening Colonoscopy: A Tandem Colonoscopic Study", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(4), pp.404~411 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Lai EJ, "The Boston bowel preparation scale : a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research", Gastrointest Endosc, 69(3 Pt 2), pp.620~625 (2009)
- Rotondano G, "Quality of bowel cleansing in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy : a multicentre prospective regional study", Dig Liver Dis, 47, pp.669~674 (2015)
- Rex DK, "Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1696~1700 (2002)
- Hassan C, "Bowel preparation for colonoscopy : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline", Endoscopy, 45, pp.142~150 (2013)
- Xie Q, "A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution as bowel preparations for colonoscopy", PLoS One, 9, pp.e99092~ (2014)
- Moon CM, "Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.1223~1228 (2014)
- Tajika M, "A randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-volume PEG solution plus ascorbic acid versus standard PEG solution in bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2015, pp.326581~ (2015)
- Kim B, "Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid and an oral sulfate solution in a split method for bowel preparation : a randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial", Dis Colon Rectum, 60, pp.426~432 (2017)
- Di Palma JA, "A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 104, pp.2275~2284 (2009)
- Rex DK, "A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.328~336 (2010)
- Kastenberg D, "Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy", World J Gastroenterol, 24, pp.2833~2843 (2018)
- Min Seob Kwak, "Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study", Gut and Liver, 13(2), pp.176~182 (2019), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
- Ju Sung Sim, "Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation and Salvage Options on Colonoscopy", Clinical Endoscopy, 49(4), pp.346~349 (2016), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Hassan C, "A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, pp.501~506 (2012)
- Longcroft-Wheaton G, "Same-day bowel cleansing regimen is superior to a split-dose regimen over 2 days for afternoon colonoscopy : results from a large prospective series", J Clin Gastroenterol, 46, pp.57~61 (2012)
- Eun CS, "The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.539~544 (2011)
- Martel M, "Split-dose preparations are superior to day-before bowel cleansing regimens : a meta-analysis", Gastroenterology, 149, pp.79~88 (2015)
- Kilgore TW, "Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1240~1245 (2011)
- Radaelli F, "Barriers against split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Gut, 66, pp.1428~1433 (2017)
- Wu KL, "Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Dis Colon Rectum, 54, pp.107~112 (2011)
- Soweid AM, "A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation", Endoscopy, 42, pp.633~638 (2010)
- Lee HH, "Comparison between an oral sulfate solution and a 2 L of polyethylene glycol", ascorbic acid as a split dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy, 2019, pp.53, e431~e437