A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is an emerging cleansing agent for bowel preparation. However, data comparing OSS to other conventional bowel preparations in Asian patients are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of OSS to ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol (AA + PEG) in Asian patients. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel, investigator-blind study performed in two university hospitals in Korea. Bowel preparation efficacy was evaluated using both the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results: Among 173 patients, 86 received OSS while 87 received AA + PEG for bowel preparation. Total OBPS score was 2.80 ± 2.48 in the OSS group and 4.49 ± 3.08 in the AA + PEG group, indicating significantly (p < 0.001) better efficacy with OSS. Total BBPS was higher in the OSS group (7.43 ± 1.49 vs. 6.51 ± 1.76, p < 0.001), indicating superior bowel preparation quality with OSS. Preparation-related adverse events were generally acceptable. Patients receiving OSS had more nausea (1.92 ± 0.94 vs. 1.54 ± 0.76, p = 0.004) and abdominal cramping (1.45 ± 0.78 vs. 1.17 ± 0.51, p = 0.006) than those receiving AA + PEG. However, overall satisfaction and taste were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: OSS had a non-inferior bowel cleansing efficacy than AA + PEG regardless of colon segment.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is an emerging cleansing agent for bowel preparation. However, data comparing OSS to other conventional bowel preparations in Asian patients are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of OSS to ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol (AA + PEG) in Asian patients. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel, investigator-blind study performed in two university hospitals in Korea. Bowel preparation efficacy was evaluated using both the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results: Among 173 patients, 86 received OSS while 87 received AA + PEG for bowel preparation. Total OBPS score was 2.80 ± 2.48 in the OSS group and 4.49 ± 3.08 in the AA + PEG group, indicating significantly (p < 0.001) better efficacy with OSS. Total BBPS was higher in the OSS group (7.43 ± 1.49 vs. 6.51 ± 1.76, p < 0.001), indicating superior bowel preparation quality with OSS. Preparation-related adverse events were generally acceptable. Patients receiving OSS had more nausea (1.92 ± 0.94 vs. 1.54 ± 0.76, p = 0.004) and abdominal cramping (1.45 ± 0.78 vs. 1.17 ± 0.51, p = 0.006) than those receiving AA + PEG. However, overall satisfaction and taste were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: OSS had a non-inferior bowel cleansing efficacy than AA + PEG regardless of colon segment.
참고문헌 (24)
- Dakkak M, "Short report: comparison of two orally administered bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 6, pp.513~519 (1992)
- Hamilton D, "Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage : a prospective randomised trial", Br J Clin Pract, 50, pp.73~75 (1996)
- Landreneau SW, "Update on preparation for colonoscopy", Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 12, pp.366~373 (2010)
- Parra-Blanco A, "Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.17709~17726 (2014)
- Vemulapalli KC, "Guidelines for an optimum screening colonoscopy", Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep, 8, pp.6~15 (2012)
- Enestvedt BK, "4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, pp.1225~1231 (2012)
- Corporaal S, "Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Scand J Gastroenterol, 45, pp.1380~1386 (2010)
- Su Hwan Kim, "Low Volume Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid, a Valid Alternative to Standard PEG", Gut and Liver, 10(2), pp.160~161 (2016), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Rees DC, "Acute haemolysis induced by high dose ascorbic acid in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency", BMJ, 306, pp.841~842 (1993)
- Rex D, "New oral sulfate solution provides superior overall and right colon cleansing versus a standard PEG and electrolyte preparation", Am J Gastroenterol, 104, pp.S180~S181 (2009)
- Di Palma JA, "A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 104, pp.2275~2284 (2009)
- Allende D, "Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease : correlation of pathological and endoscopic findings", Colorectal Dis, 16, pp.710~718 (2014)
- Rex DK, "A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.328~336 (2010)
- Katz PO, "A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy : results from the SEE CLEAR II study", Am J Gastroenterol, 108, pp.401~409 (2013)
- Aihara H, "A pilot study using reduced-volume oral sulfate solution as a preparation for colonoscopy among a Japanese population", Int J Colorectal Dis, 28, pp.83~87 (2013)
- Lai EJ, "The Boston bowel preparation scale : a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research", Gastrointest Endosc, 69(3 Pt 2), pp.620~625 (2009)
- Byrne MF, "The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1587~1590 (2002)
- 강미선, "Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability between Same-day Picosulfate and Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial", Intestinal research, 12(1), pp.53~59 (2014), 대한장연구학회
- Millan MS, "Adenoma detection rate : the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy", Dis Colon Rectum, 51, pp.1217~1220 (2008)
- Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)
- Wang HS, "Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.71~78 (2013)
- Bitoun A, "Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 24, pp.1631~1642 (2006)
- Ell C, "Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 103, pp.883~893 (2008)