본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Low-volume preparations for colonoscopy are gaining attention for their higher acceptability. However, the efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution (OSS) preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been well known. Therefore, we aimed to compare OSS and 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG+Asc) for bowel preparation in inactive UC. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at six tertiary referral hospitals in Korea. Outpatients with UC who had stable disease activity were randomly allocated to the OSS group or the 2-L PEG+Asc group for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The study outcomes included treatment efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability. Bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and rated as successful cleansing if the score was ≥6. Patient acceptance and tolerability were assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale. Additionally, disease activity and laboratory data before and after colonoscopy were evaluated to check for safety. Results: The OSS and 2-L PEG+Asc groups included 92 and 93 participants, respectively. No significant between-group difference was noted in successful cleansing (OSS [96.7%] vs 2-L PEG+Asc [97.8%], p=0.64). Moreover, the safety, acceptance, and tolerability were not significantly different (all p>0.05). Furthermore, no significant changes were found in serum electrolytes or disease activity in either group. Conclusions: OSS is effective for colonoscopy cleansing, has acceptable tolerability, and does not affect disease activity; thus, it can be used safely for bowel preparation in patients with inactive UC.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Low-volume preparations for colonoscopy are gaining attention for their higher acceptability. However, the efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution (OSS) preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been well known. Therefore, we aimed to compare OSS and 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG+Asc) for bowel preparation in inactive UC. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at six tertiary referral hospitals in Korea. Outpatients with UC who had stable disease activity were randomly allocated to the OSS group or the 2-L PEG+Asc group for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The study outcomes included treatment efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability. Bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and rated as successful cleansing if the score was ≥6. Patient acceptance and tolerability were assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale. Additionally, disease activity and laboratory data before and after colonoscopy were evaluated to check for safety. Results: The OSS and 2-L PEG+Asc groups included 92 and 93 participants, respectively. No significant between-group difference was noted in successful cleansing (OSS [96.7%] vs 2-L PEG+Asc [97.8%], p=0.64). Moreover, the safety, acceptance, and tolerability were not significantly different (all p>0.05). Furthermore, no significant changes were found in serum electrolytes or disease activity in either group. Conclusions: OSS is effective for colonoscopy cleansing, has acceptable tolerability, and does not affect disease activity; thus, it can be used safely for bowel preparation in patients with inactive UC.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Collins PD, "Strategies for detecting colon cancer and dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 19, pp.860~863 (2013)
  2. Jess T, "Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis : a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, pp.639~645 (2012)
  3. Clarke WT, "Colorectal cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease : practice guidelines and recent developments", World J Gastroenterol, 25, pp.4148~4157 (2019)
  4. Schroeder KW, "Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis : a randomized study", N Engl J Med, 317, pp.1625~1629 (1987)
  5. Leighton JA, "ASGE guideline : endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.558~565 (2006)
  6. Denters MJ, "Patients' perception of colonoscopy : patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome experience the largest burden", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 25, pp.964~972 (2013)
  7. Friedman S, "Factors that affect adherence to surveillance colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 19, pp.534~539 (2013)
  8. Bessissow T, "Anxiety is associated with impaired tolerance of colonoscopy preparation in inflammatory bowel disease and controls", J Crohns Colitis, 7, pp.e580~e587 (2013)
  9. Barkun A, "Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy : efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper", Can J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.699~710 (2006)
  10. Johnson DA, "Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy : recommendations from the U. S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer", Gastrointest Endosc, 80, pp.543~562 (2014)
  11. Jover R, "Clinical practice guidelines : quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening", Endoscopy, 44, pp.444~451 (2012)
  12. Xie Q, "A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution as bowel preparations for colonoscopy", PLoS One, 9, pp.e99092~ (2014)
  13. Rex DK, "A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.328~336 (2010)
  14. Yang HJ, "Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 32, pp.12~18 (2017)
  15. Farrokhyar F, "Functional gastrointestinal disorders and mood disorders in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease : prevalence and impact on health", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 12, pp.38~46 (2006)
  16. Kim ES, "Comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and 2-l polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis", Dig Dis Sci, 62, pp.2489~2497 (2017)
  17. Parente F, "2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation", Dig Liver Dis, 47, pp.857~863 (2015)
  18. Repici A, "Randomised clinical trial : low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy : a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 36, pp.717~724 (2012)
  19. Manes G, "Colon cleansing for colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis : efficacy and acceptability of a 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl versus 4-L PEG", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 21, pp.2137~2144 (2015)
  20. Di Palma JA, "A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 104, pp.2275~2284 (2009)
  21. Rex DK, "A comparison of oral sulfate solution with sodium picosulfate : magnesium citrate in split doses as bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 80, pp.1113~1123 (2014)
  22. Kim B, "Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid and an oral sulfate solution in a split method for bowel preparation : a randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial", Dis Colon Rectum, 60, pp.426~432 (2017)
  23. Lee HH, "Comparison between an oral sulfate solution and a 2 L of polyethylene glycol", ascorbic acid as a split dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy, 2019, pp.53, e431~e437
  24. Jeeyeon Kim, "Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study", Intestinal research, 17(3), pp.413~418 (2019), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
  25. Lawrance IC, "Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy : prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents", Endoscopy, 43, pp.412~418 (2011)
  26. Menees S, "Does colonoscopy cause increased ulcerative colitis symptoms?", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 13, pp.12~18 (2007)
  27. Briot C, "Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of low-volume bowel preparations for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases : the French multicentre clean study", J Crohns Colitis, 13, pp.1121~1130 (2019)
  28. Min Seob Kwak, "Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study", Gut and Liver, 13(2), pp.176~182 (2019), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
  29. Collatuzzo G, "Determinants of symptom burden related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Dig Liver Dis, 54, pp.1554~1560 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol임윤정, 진윤태, Beom Jae Lee, Ei Rie Cho, Ji Ae Lee, Ji Yoon Kim, Jong-Jae Park, Ki Hwan Kwon, Moon Kyung Joo, Taehyun Kim, Wonjae Choi, Yu Ra Sim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제4호Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation강현우, 이성주, 임윤정, 홍석보, Jae Hak Kim, Ji Hyung Nam, Jin Ho Lee대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2020 · 제53권 제5호Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution김은영, Byung Ik Jang, Chang Heon Yang, Ki Young Lim, Kyeong Ok Kim, on behalf of Crohn’s and Colitis Association in Daegu-Gyeongbuk (CCAiD), Sung Kook Kim, Yoo Jin Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2023 · 제38권 제5호Comments on Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical TrialKim Ji Eun거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2024 · 제18권 제1호Does Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid Induce More Mucosal Injuries than Split-Dose 4-L PEG during Bowel Preparation?김민성, 김지연, 김태오, 김형준, 박승하, 박재현, 박종하, 양성연, 장현정, 주희린, 최준혁, 허내윤거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제2호Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) StudyDong Il Park, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Gun Kim, Intestinal Cancer Study Group of the Korean Association for the Study, Jae Myung Cha, Jeong Eun Shin, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Jongha Park, Jun Lee, Kyeong Ok Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Young Eun Joo거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2019 · 제13권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)