본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Does Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid Induce More Mucosal Injuries than Split-Dose 4-L PEG during Bowel Preparation?

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: The aims of this study were to compare the bowel-cleansing efficacy, patient affinity for the preparation solution, and mucosal injury between a split dose of polyethylene glycol (SD-PEG) and low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid (LV-PEG+Asc) in outpatient scheduled colonoscopies. Methods: Of the 319 patients, 160 were enrolled for SDPEG, and 159 for LV-PEG+Asc. The bowel-cleansing efficacy was rated according to the Ottawa bowel preparation scale. Patient affinity for the preparation solution was assessed using a questionnaire. All mucosal injuries observed during colonoscopy were biopsied and histopathologically reviewed. Results: There was no significant difference in bowel cleansing between the groups. The LV-PEG+Asc group reported better patient acceptance and preference. There were no significant differences in the incidence or characteristics of the mucosal injuries between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with SD-PEG, LV-PEG+Asc exhibited equivalent bowel-cleansing efficacy and resulted in improved patient acceptance and preference. There was no significant difference in mucosal injury between SD-PEG and LV-PEG+Asc. Thus, the LV-PEG+Asc preparation could be used more effectively and easily for routine colonoscopies without risking significant mucosal injury. (

Abstract

Background/Aims: The aims of this study were to compare the bowel-cleansing efficacy, patient affinity for the preparation solution, and mucosal injury between a split dose of polyethylene glycol (SD-PEG) and low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid (LV-PEG+Asc) in outpatient scheduled colonoscopies. Methods: Of the 319 patients, 160 were enrolled for SDPEG, and 159 for LV-PEG+Asc. The bowel-cleansing efficacy was rated according to the Ottawa bowel preparation scale. Patient affinity for the preparation solution was assessed using a questionnaire. All mucosal injuries observed during colonoscopy were biopsied and histopathologically reviewed. Results: There was no significant difference in bowel cleansing between the groups. The LV-PEG+Asc group reported better patient acceptance and preference. There were no significant differences in the incidence or characteristics of the mucosal injuries between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with SD-PEG, LV-PEG+Asc exhibited equivalent bowel-cleansing efficacy and resulted in improved patient acceptance and preference. There was no significant difference in mucosal injury between SD-PEG and LV-PEG+Asc. Thus, the LV-PEG+Asc preparation could be used more effectively and easily for routine colonoscopies without risking significant mucosal injury. (

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Otto S. Lin, "Impact of Sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Evidence-Based Review of Published Prospective and Retrospective Studies", Intestinal research, 12(4), pp.268~274 (2014), 대한장연구학회
  2. Ho-Su Lee, "Bowel Preparation, the First Step for a Good Quality Colonoscopy", Intestinal research, 12(1), pp.1~2 (2014), 대한장연구학회
  3. Ell C, "A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowelcleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*)", Endoscopy, 35, pp.300~304 (2003)
  4. Balaban DH, "Oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 26, pp.965~966 (2007)
  5. Aronchick CA, "A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda", Gastrointest Endosc, 52, pp.346~352 (2000)
  6. Radaelli F, "High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigatorblinded trial", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.2674~2680 (2005)
  7. Lukejohn W. Day, "Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Elderly: Updates and Controversies", Gut and Liver, 9(2), pp.143~151 (2015), 거트앤리버 발행위원회
  8. Regev A, "Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution", Am J Gastroenterol, 93, pp.1478~1482 (1998)
  9. Moon CM, "Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.1223~1228 (2014)
  10. 김현건, "Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial", Gut and Liver, 9(4), pp.494~501 (2015), 거트앤리버 발행위원회
  11. 배서은, "A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial", Gut and Liver, 7(4), pp.423~429 (2013), 거트앤리버 발행위원회
  12. Watts DA, "Endoscopic and histologic features of sodium phosphate bowel preparation-induced colonic ulceration: case report and review", Gastrointest Endosc, 55, pp.584~587 (2002)
  13. Chan A, "Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: pitfalls and complications", Can J Gastroenterol, 11, pp.334~338 (1997)
  14. Lawrance IC, "Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy:prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents", Endoscopy, 43, pp.412~418 (2011)
  15. Hookey LC, "Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy", Can J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.101~105 (2006)
  16. Sharma VK, "Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation", Gastrointest Endosc, 47, pp.167~171 (1998)
  17. Marmo R, "Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.313~320 (2010)
  18. Rejchrt S, "A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.651~654 (2004)
  19. Frommer D, "Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy", Dis Colon Rectum, 40, pp.100~104 (1997)
  20. Aoun E, "A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation", Gastrointest Endosc, 62, pp.213~218 (2005)
  21. Reilly T, "Reasons for poor colonic preparation with inpatients", Gastroenterol Nurs, 27, pp.115~117 (2004)
  22. Kilgore TW, "Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1240~1245 (2011)
  23. Rostom A, "Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.482~486 (2004)
  24. Valiante F, "A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy", Dig Liver Dis, 44, pp.224~227 (2012)
  25. Cohen LB, "Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation:a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 32, pp.637~644 (2010)
  26. Ell C, "Randomized trial of lowvolume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 103, pp.883~893 (2008)
  27. Menees S, "Does colonoscopy cause increased ulcerative colitis symptoms?", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 13, pp.12~18 (2007)
  28. Zwas FR, "Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution", Gastrointest Endosc, 43, pp.463~466 (1996)
  29. Driman DK, "Colorectal inflammation and increased cell proliferation associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel preparation solution", Hum Pathol, 29, pp.972~978 (1998)
  30. Atkinson RJ, "Colonic ulceration after sodium phosphate bowel preparation", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.2603~2605 (2005)
  31. Faigel DO, "Aphthoid lesions of the rectum", Gastrointest Endosc, 43, pp.528~529 (1996)
  32. Cappell MS, "Colonic toxicity of administered drugs and chemicals", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.1175~1190 (2004)
  33. Siddiqui AA, "Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.700~706 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation강현우, 이성주, 임윤정, 홍석보, Jae Hak Kim, Ji Hyung Nam, Jin Ho Lee대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2020 · 제53권 제5호Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution김은영, Byung Ik Jang, Chang Heon Yang, Ki Young Lim, Kyeong Ok Kim, on behalf of Crohn’s and Colitis Association in Daegu-Gyeongbuk (CCAiD), Sung Kook Kim, Yoo Jin Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2023 · 제38권 제5호Comparing 1-L and 2-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled TrialBaik Gwang Ho, Bang Chang Seok, Jang Hyun Joo, Kae Sea Hyub, Kim Jin Bae, Kim Yu Jin, Lee Jae Gon, Lee Sang Pyo, Oh Chang Kyo, Seo Seung In, Shin Woon Geon, Yang Young Joo거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2025 · 제19권 제1호A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol임윤정, 진윤태, Beom Jae Lee, Ei Rie Cho, Ji Ae Lee, Ji Yoon Kim, Jong-Jae Park, Ki Hwan Kwon, Moon Kyung Joo, Taehyun Kim, Wonjae Choi, Yu Ra Sim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제4호Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial강호석, 김정호, Jeong Seok-Hoo, Kim Dae Bum, Koo Ja Seol, Lee Hyun Seok, Lee Ji Min, Lee Kang-Moon거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2023 · 제17권 제4호Optimal and Safe Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy문원대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)