본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Novel regimen for colonoscopy bowel preparation with oral lactulose: a prospective comparative study

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is considered the gold standard regimen for bowel preparation; however, due to the necessity of a large volume, patient tolerance is impaired. Therefore, lactulose is a novel alternative for colonoscopy preparation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lactulose-based bowel preparations in comparison with PEG for colonoscopy. Methods: This is a prospective, non-blinded, comparative study. Outpatients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1 (111 patients), PEG; and group 2 (111 patients), lactulose. The following clinical outcomes were assessed in each group: degree of bowel clearance using the Boston bowel preparation score, colorectal polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, tolerability, and side effects. Results: The rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 8.1% and 1.8% for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p=0.030). The Boston bowel preparation score for the entire colon was 7.34±1.17 and 8.36±1.09 for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p<0.001). The satisfactory overall experience rates were 27.9% and 62.2% for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: The novel bowel preparation with oral lactulose was superior to that with PEG in terms of colon cleansing, adenoma detection rate, tolerance, and patient experience.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is considered the gold standard regimen for bowel preparation; however, due to the necessity of a large volume, patient tolerance is impaired. Therefore, lactulose is a novel alternative for colonoscopy preparation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lactulose-based bowel preparations in comparison with PEG for colonoscopy. Methods: This is a prospective, non-blinded, comparative study. Outpatients were randomly divided into two groups: group 1 (111 patients), PEG; and group 2 (111 patients), lactulose. The following clinical outcomes were assessed in each group: degree of bowel clearance using the Boston bowel preparation score, colorectal polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, tolerability, and side effects. Results: The rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 8.1% and 1.8% for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p=0.030). The Boston bowel preparation score for the entire colon was 7.34±1.17 and 8.36±1.09 for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p<0.001). The satisfactory overall experience rates were 27.9% and 62.2% for the PEG and lactulose groups, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: The novel bowel preparation with oral lactulose was superior to that with PEG in terms of colon cleansing, adenoma detection rate, tolerance, and patient experience.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions:esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002", Gastrointest Endosc, 58(6 Suppl), pp.S3~S43 (2003)
  2. Hassan C, "Bowel preparation for colonoscopy : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Guideline-Update 2019", Endoscopy, 51, pp.775~794 (2019)
  3. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Bowel preparation before colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.781~794 (2015)
  4. Park SB, "Quality indicators in colonoscopy : the chasm be tween ideal and reality", Clin Endosc, 55(3), pp.332~338 (2022)
  5. Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colo noscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)
  6. Sharma P, "The importance of colonos copy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention", Endosc Int Open, 8, pp.E673~E683 (2020)
  7. Oh CH, "Suboptimal bowel preparation sig nificantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms", Dig Dis Sci, 60, pp.2294~2303 (2015)
  8. Zawaly K, "The efficacy of split dose bowel preparations for polyp detection : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 114, pp.884~892 (2019)
  9. Petrelli F, "Prognostic survival asso ciated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis", JAMA Oncol, 3, pp.211~219 (2017)
  10. Singh S, "Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers : a systematic review and me ta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.1375~1389 (2014)
  11. Pohl J, "Impact of the quality of bowel cleansing on the efficacy of colonic cancer screening : a prospective, randomized, blinded study", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0126067~ (2015)
  12. Hernandez PV, "Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy : results of a prospec tive, randomized, comparative pilot study", BMC Gastroenterol, 20, pp.227~ (2020)
  13. Froehlich F, "Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy : the Euro pean Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Euro pean multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.378~384 (2005)
  14. Sadeghi A, "Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume poly ethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? : a randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial", Health Sci Rep, 5, pp.e829~ (2022)
  15. Waldmann E, "Impact of high-volume, in termediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonos copy quality and patient satisfaction : an observational study", United European Gastroenterol J, 7, pp.114~124 (2019)
  16. Occhipinti V, "Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared : a real-life single-blinded large-population study", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 13, pp.659~672 (2021)
  17. Barkun AN, "The Bowel CLEANsing National Initiative : high-volume split-dose vs low-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol preparations : a randomized controlled trial", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20, pp.e1469~e1477 (2022)
  18. López S, "Effectiveness and tolerability of low vol ume bowel cleansing polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy", Rev Med Chil, 147, pp.977~982 (2019)
  19. Sun CL, "Low-volume bowel preparation is associated with reduced time to colonoscopy in hospitalized patients : a propensity-matched analysis", Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 13, pp.e00482~ (2022)
  20. Spadaccini M, "Efficacy and tolerability of high-vs low-volume split-dose bowel cleansing regimens for colo noscopy : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 18, pp.1454~1465 (2020)
  21. van Riswijk ML, "Efficacy of ultra-low volume(≤1 L)bowel preparation fluids : systematic review and me ta-analysis", Dig Endosc, 34, pp.13~32 (2022)
  22. Frazzoni L, "1L-vs. 4L-Polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy among inpatients : a pro pensity score-matching analysis", Dig Liver Dis, 52, pp.1486~1493 (2020)
  23. Bednarska O, "The effectiveness and tolerability of a very low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared to low and high-volume polyethylene glycol-solutions in the real-life setting", Diagnostics(Basel), 12, pp.1155~ (2022)
  24. Maida M, "Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy : a prospective, multicenter observational study", World J Gastroenterol, 26, pp.1950~1961 (2020)
  25. Yuanchao H, "The advantage of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution combined with lactulose in patients with long interval preparation-to-colonoscopy", Turk J Gastroenterol, 31, pp.23~29 (2020)
  26. Lu J, "Application of oral lactulose in com bination with polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonos copy bowel preparation in patients with constipation", Am J Ther, 23, pp.e1020~e1024 (2016)
  27. Menacho AM, "Double-blind prospec tive randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy", Arq Bras Cir Dig, 27, pp.912~ (2014)
  28. Wenqi S, "Lactulose vs polyethylene gly col for bowel preparation : a single-center, prospective, random ized controlled study based on BMI", Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 15, pp.e00652~ (2024)
  29. Jagdeep J, "Oral lactulose vs. polyethylene gly col for bowel preparation in colonoscopy : a randomized controlled study", Cureus, 13, pp.e14363~ (2021)
  30. Li CX, "Comparison of polyethylene glycol ver sus lactulose oral solution for bowel preparation prior to colonosco py", Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019, pp.2651450~ (2019)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)