본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한․중 공간형용사 의미 대조 연구 - {깊다/深}를 중심으로 -

A comparative study on Korean and Chinese spatial adjectives – focused on {deep} -

2

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper discusses the research direction of the contrastive study on meanings of Korean and Chinese spatial adjectives focused on the meanings starting from the importance of spatial adjectives. Based on this, vocabulary ‘deep’ is selected to be done the concrete contrastive study. This paper shows that the information of meanings of dictionaries is insufficient through the analysis of dictionaries, which the existing study is mostly based on the information of dictionaries and only gives the simple contrast whether the vocabulary has the meaning or not. And also it points out that based on the materials of language, the meaning system of vocabulary should be grasped and the contrast should be provided if the contrastive study is done in depth. This paper also proposes that it is necessary to establish the contrast of meaning system and the frame of meaning contrast from the broader point of view. It also discusses that the frame of meaning contrast should be established on the basis of the original attributes of spatial adjectives and the appearance of meaning extension which is based on the direction of meaning extension of general vocabulary. Based on the above discussion, 16058 examples of ‘deep’ and 53497 examples of {深} among 60 million eojeol of modern primitive corpus from 21st Century Sejong Project which is established by the National Institute of the Korean and 700 million eojeol from Modern Chinese CCL Corpus (online version) which is established by Center for Chinese Linguistic PKU are chosen in this paper. According to this, the meaning system of {deep/深} is grasped and the frame of meaning contrast is established. This paper tries to clarify general commonness and distinct characteristics of the meaning of {deep/深} by contrasting the meaning.

Abstract

This paper discusses the research direction of the contrastive study on meanings of Korean and Chinese spatial adjectives focused on the meanings starting from the importance of spatial adjectives. Based on this, vocabulary ‘deep’ is selected to be done the concrete contrastive study. This paper shows that the information of meanings of dictionaries is insufficient through the analysis of dictionaries, which the existing study is mostly based on the information of dictionaries and only gives the simple contrast whether the vocabulary has the meaning or not. And also it points out that based on the materials of language, the meaning system of vocabulary should be grasped and the contrast should be provided if the contrastive study is done in depth. This paper also proposes that it is necessary to establish the contrast of meaning system and the frame of meaning contrast from the broader point of view. It also discusses that the frame of meaning contrast should be established on the basis of the original attributes of spatial adjectives and the appearance of meaning extension which is based on the direction of meaning extension of general vocabulary. Based on the above discussion, 16058 examples of ‘deep’ and 53497 examples of {深} among 60 million eojeol of modern primitive corpus from 21st Century Sejong Project which is established by the National Institute of the Korean and 700 million eojeol from Modern Chinese CCL Corpus (online version) which is established by Center for Chinese Linguistic PKU are chosen in this paper. According to this, the meaning system of {deep/深} is grasped and the frame of meaning contrast is established. This paper tries to clarify general commonness and distinct characteristics of the meaning of {deep/深} by contrasting the meaning.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 고창운, "변이의미의 생성과 한국인- 형용사 ‘크다’의 변이의미 생성을 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 36, pp.1~19 (2006), 우리말글학회
  2. 김광해, "형용사 유의어의 뜻풀이 정교화 방안에 대한 연구", 先淸語文, 27(1), pp.605~631 (1999), 서울대학교 국어교육과
  3. 김억조, "국어 차원 형용사의 의미 대립 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  4. 김준기, "척도 형용사의 다의성 연구", 새국어교육, (67), pp.119~142 (2004), 한국국어교육학회
  5. 김창섭, "시각형용사의 어휘론, In 한국어 형태론 연구", pp.341~370 (1985), 태학사
  6. 김흥규, "21세기 세종계획 현대국어 기초말뭉치 성과와 전망", 2007년도 제19회 한글 및 한국어 정보처리 학술대회, pp.311~316 (2007), 한국정보과학회 언어공학연구회
  7. 민영란, "한․중 공간감각어의 다의 구조 연구-한국어에 대한 중국어의 대응표현을 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2009
  8. 박선영, "공간 차원 형용사의 대립 관계 연구: ‘깊다", 얕다’를 중심으로, 2007, pp.23, 57~76[DOI]
  9. 박철우, "형용사 논항 의미부류 표준화를 위한 기초 연구 - '크다, 작다, 많다, 적다'를 중심으로 -", 언어학, (38), pp.123~153 (2004), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  10. 배해수, "길이 그림씨에 대한 고찰", 용봉논총, 12, pp.121~133 (1982), 전남대학교 인문과학연구소
  11. 양태식, "국어 차원낱말의 의미구조", 박사, pp.1985
  12. 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
  13. 임지룡, "공간감각어의 의미 특성", 배달말, 9, pp.119~137 (2006), 배달말학회
  14. 정인수, "국어 형용사의 의미 자질 연구", 박사, pp.1994
  15. 沈賢淑, "漢朝空間維度詞的對比", 석사, pp.2001
  16. 任永軍, "空間維度詞‘高", 低(矮)’的認知語義分析, 2001, pp.(2), 123~125
  17. 任永軍, "空間維度詞‘深", 淺’的認知語義分析, 2001, pp.16(4), 23~26
  18. 任永軍, "空間維度詞‘大", 小’的認知語義分析, 2004, pp.(52), 30~33
  19. 任永軍, "直線型空間維度詞隱喩義認知分析", 聊城大學學報(社會科學版), (3), pp.72~75 (2006)
  20. 田美花, "漢韓空間緯度詞"大", 小"的語義對比, 延邊大學, 2006
  21. 張國憲, "現代漢語形容詞功能與認知硏究" (2006), 商務印書館
  22. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 주) 두산동아
  23. 연세대 언어정보연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998)
  24. 서상규, "(외국인을 위한)한국어 학습 사전" (2006), 신원프라임
  25. "辞海" (1989), 上海辞书出版社
  26. "中华民国六十五年二月修订正续合编附补编臺五版, 辞源", 商务印书馆编辑部
  27. 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2010), 商务印书馆

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (33건)