Development and Application of Three Models for the Curriculum Design
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to explain the necessity of the curriculum design model which can clearly reveal the compositional characteristics of school curricula. Moreover, this study is to support the basic logics of the design models and to lay the groundwork for improvement of the models by exposing its pros and cons. In this context, this study suggests three models. One is the Key Model, which is based on the core and the surroundings those are the most universal domain in school curricula. Next, the Octagon Model, which consists of subjects and extra-curricular domains. At last, this research proposes the Triangle Model, which is made to show the characteristics of career-based learning. All three models have different usages but when they are combined properly, they would provide help in planning a better school curriculum. All three models do not have to be utilized at all times for curriculum design at all levels. Each has different merits, and if they are improved and integrated that allows them to cover each other’s weaknesses, the contribution to future curriculum design fields in South Korea will not be small.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the necessity of the curriculum design model which can clearly reveal the compositional characteristics of school curricula. Moreover, this study is to support the basic logics of the design models and to lay the groundwork for improvement of the models by exposing its pros and cons. In this context, this study suggests three models. One is the Key Model, which is based on the core and the surroundings those are the most universal domain in school curricula. Next, the Octagon Model, which consists of subjects and extra-curricular domains. At last, this research proposes the Triangle Model, which is made to show the characteristics of career-based learning. All three models have different usages but when they are combined properly, they would provide help in planning a better school curriculum. All three models do not have to be utilized at all times for curriculum design at all levels. Each has different merits, and if they are improved and integrated that allows them to cover each other’s weaknesses, the contribution to future curriculum design fields in South Korea will not be small.
참고문헌 (13)
- W. H. Schubert, "Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility" (1986), Macmillan
- Hoojo Hong, "Easliy known curriculum" (2016), Haksisa
- M. J. Adler., "The paideia program: An educational syllabus" (1984), Macmillan
- E. S. Rychen, "Key competencies for a successful life and a well functioning society" (2003), Hogrefe & Huber
- J. Dewey, "Democracy and education" (1936), Macmillan
- D. S. Snedden, "Sociological determination of objectives in education" (1921), Lippincott
- R. Tyler., "Basic principles of curriculum and instruction" (1949), University of Chicago Press
- H. Spencer, "Education: Intellectual, moral, and physical" (1861), D. Appleton
- Ministry of Education., "2015 National Curriculum", ~ (2015)
- Sehee Oh, "Small-sized elementary school consolidation in Ulasn province", ~ (2016)
- IBO, "Roles for IB world schools: Diploma Programme", IB, ~ (2011)
- Hoojo Hong, "Understanding curriculum" (2003), Haksisa
- Hoojo Hong, "Curriculum" (2009), Munemsa
