본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is Victory Enough? The Complementary Effects of the Economy and War Outcome on Postwar Leader Survival

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Which matters more to a democratic leader seeking to stay in power: Success in the economy or success in foreign policy? When a leader wins a war and manages the economy well, such successes not only confirm the competence of a leader to the public but also boost his/her political future. The war outcome and the economy are, thus, complementary signals of leader competence to the public. However, which one matters more? To test this, a series of the Cox proportional hazard model are employed. The data set, Archigos, includes key information on political leaders. The data analysis covers 2049 leaders of 166 countries during the period between 1919 and 1999. I find that while victory in war and the good economy at home contribute positively to the duration of postwar tenure, victory and the economy at are complementary signals of leader competency to the public. Thus, to democratic leaders victory alone is not beneficial unless they succeed in managing the economy at home as well. This, thus, suggests that the economy at home is a more dominant signal of leader competence to victorious leaders.

Abstract

Which matters more to a democratic leader seeking to stay in power: Success in the economy or success in foreign policy? When a leader wins a war and manages the economy well, such successes not only confirm the competence of a leader to the public but also boost his/her political future. The war outcome and the economy are, thus, complementary signals of leader competence to the public. However, which one matters more? To test this, a series of the Cox proportional hazard model are employed. The data set, Archigos, includes key information on political leaders. The data analysis covers 2049 leaders of 166 countries during the period between 1919 and 1999. I find that while victory in war and the good economy at home contribute positively to the duration of postwar tenure, victory and the economy at are complementary signals of leader competency to the public. Thus, to democratic leaders victory alone is not beneficial unless they succeed in managing the economy at home as well. This, thus, suggests that the economy at home is a more dominant signal of leader competence to victorious leaders.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Aldrich, J. H., "Foreign Policy and the Electoral Connection", Annual Review of Political Science, pp.477~502 (2006)
  2. Anderson, C. J., "The Economics of Politics in Comparative Perspective Revisited: An Introduction", Political Behavior, 19, pp.1~5 (1997)
  3. Barbieri, K., "The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  4. Bennett, D. S., "EUGene: A Conceptual Manual", International Interactions, 26, pp.179~204 (2000)
  5. Bienen, H., "A Proportional Hazard Model of Leadership Duration", Journal Of Politics, 54, pp.685~717 (1992)
  6. Boehmke, F. J., "Selection Bias and Continuous Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution", American Journal of Political Science, 50, pp.192~207 (2006)
  7. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., "Event History Modeling: A Guide For Social Scientists" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  8. Bueno De Mesquita, B., "War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability", American Political Science Review, 89, pp.841~855 (1995)
  9. Bueno De Mesquita, B., "An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace", American Political Science Review, 93, pp.791~807 (1999)
  10. Bueno De Mesquita, B., "War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis", American Political Science Review, 86, pp.638~646 (1992)
  11. Chan, S., "Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies' Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom", Foreign Policy Analysis, 2, pp.137~156 (2006)
  12. Chiozza, G., "International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Insufficient?", American Journal Of Political Science, 48, pp.604~619 (2004)
  13. Chiozza, G., "Avoiding Diversionary Targets", Journal of Peace Research, 41, pp.423~443 (2004)
  14. Colaresi, M., "Aftershocks: Postwar Leadership Survival, Rivalry, and Regime Dynamics", International Studies Quarterly, 48, pp.713~727 (2004)
  15. Coufoudakis, V., "Greek-Turkish Relations, 1973-1983: The View from Athens", International Security, 9(4), pp.185~217 (1985)
  16. Downs, G. W., "Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War", American Journal of Political Science, 38(2), pp.362~380 (1994)
  17. Downs, G. W., "Optimally Imperfect Solution" (1995), Princeton University Press
  18. Doyle, M., "Liberalism and World Politics", American Political Science Review, 80, pp.1151~1169 (1986)
  19. Fearon, J. D., "Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes", American Political Science Review, 88, pp.577~592 (1994)
  20. Fearon, J. D., "Rationalist Explanations for War", International Organization, 49(3), pp.397~414 (1995)
  21. Fiorina, M. P., "Retrospective Voting In American National Elections" (1981), Yale University Press
  22. Gartner, S. S., "War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of Legislators", Political Research Quarterly, 53, pp.467~477 (2003)
  23. Geddes, B., "Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument", Paper Presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (1999)
  24. Gelpi, C., "Attracting Trouble: Democracy, Leadership Tenure, and the Targeting of Militarized Challenges, 1918-1992", Journal Of Conflict Resolution, 45, pp.794~817 (2001)
  25. Gleditsch, K. S., "Expanded Trade and GDP Data", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), pp.712~724 (2002)
  26. Goemans, H. E., "Fighting for Survival: The Fate of Leaders and the Duration of War", Journal Of Conflict Resolution, 44, pp.555~579 (2000)
  27. Goemans, H. E., "Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders", Journal Of Peace Research, 46, pp.269~283 (2009)
  28. Hellwig, T. T., "Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting", Journal of Politics, 63, pp.1141~1162 (2001)
  29. Hurwitz, J., "How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured?", American Journal of Political Science, 29, pp.871~890 (1987)
  30. Huth, P. K., "Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict" (1996), University of Michigan Press
  31. Johns, L., "Knowing the Unknown: Executive Evaluation and International Crisis Outcomes", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, pp.228~252 (2006)
  32. Krebs, R. R., "Perverse Institutionalism: Nato and the Greco-Turkish Conflict", International Organization, 53(2), pp.343~377 (1999)
  33. Lai, B., "Rally 'Round the Union Jack? Public Opinion and the Use of Force in the United Kingdom, 1948-2001", International Studies Quarterly, 49, pp.255~272 (2005)
  34. Lewis-Beck, M., "Economics And Elections: The Major Western Democracies" (1988), University Of Michigan Press
  35. Mackuen, M. B., "Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity", American Journal Of Political Science, 27, pp.165~192 (1983)
  36. Maeda, K., "Duration of Party Control in Parliamentary and Presidential Governments", Comparative Politics, 39, pp.352~374 (2006)
  37. Mitchell, B. R., "International Historical Statistics: Africa, Asia & Oceania, 1750-1993" (1998), Macmillen
  38. Mitchell, B. R., "International Historical Statistics: Americas, 1750-1993" (1998), Macmillen
  39. Mitchell, B. R., "International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750-1993" (1993), Macmillen
  40. Milstein, J. S., "Dynamics of The Vietnam War: A Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Computer Simulation" (1974), Ohio State University Press
  41. Milstein, J. S., "Computer Simulation of International Process: The Vietnam War and the Pre-World War I Naval Race", Peach Research Society, 12, pp.117~136 (1968)
  42. Mueller, J. E., "Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson", American Political Science Review, 64, pp.18~34 (1970)
  43. Nadeau, R., "National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections", Journal of Politics, 63, pp.159~181 (2001)
  44. Nickelsburg, M., "Commander-in-Chief or Chief Economist? The President in the Eye of the Public", Electoral Studies, 19, pp.313~332 (2000)
  45. Peceny, M., "Dictatorial Peace?", American Political Science Review, 96, pp.15~26 (2002)
  46. Regens, J. L., "The Electoral Consequences of Voting to Declare War", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, pp.168~182 (1995)
  47. Rosato, S., "The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory", American Political Science Review, 97, pp.585~602 (2003)
  48. Schultz, K. A., "Do Domestic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War", International Organization, 53, pp.233~266 (1999)
  49. Smith, A., "Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems", International Studies Quarterly, 40, pp.133~153 (1996)
  50. Smith, A., "International Crises and Domestic Politics", American Political Science Review, 92, pp.623~638 (1998)
  51. Van Raedonck, D. C., "After the Shooting Stops: Insights on Postwar Economic Growth", Journal of Peace Research, 26, pp.249~264 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)