러시아와 신동북아 문화권
Russia and New North East Asia Culture
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to consider current pressing issues in setting up New North East Asia Culture concept. Today, conflicts among countries in North East Asia are too intense to establish New North East Asia Culture involving China, Japan, Korea and Russia. As they have a different view toward each territory, their position on such issues as missile defense and North Korea’s nuclear problem also varies, which may seriously hampers New North East Asia Culture. Therefore, the countries in North East Asia need to respond to U.S. missile defense system and North Korea nuclear problem in a long-term and forward-looking manner. And, as we can see in the relationship between China and Russia, what it appears in North East Asian countries’ friendship is different what lies within. And I started my research to find out whether it’s possible to include Russia into New North East Asia Culture. But, in the end, I cannot help but doubt whether Korea can be included in New North East Asia Culture, when it’s created. In terms of New North East Asia Culture, it will be obvious to Russia that the Far Est should be the geographic center. As for future prospects of its exchange with Korea, it’s very promising, for example establishing peace in North East Asia, reunifying North & South Koreas, securing resources in the Far Est, setting up logistics linkage to Europe, etc. But, among four main parties of New North East Asia Culture, only Russia, Japan and China except for Korea are very active in cooperation in culture, economy and politics at both public and private levels. Therefore, if Russia’s interest in Korea is far less than China and Japan, then it’s quite doubtful of Korea’s future role and position in this new North East Asia region. In addition, it’s very problematic that Korea is not duly considered in North Korea’s nuclear issue and military force competition. If Korea has just marginal influence over not only cultural, economic and political areas but also diplomatic and military areas which usually draws immediate response, then Korea will be simply dragged by other countries in New North East Asia. That’s why Korea needs to make a wise and practical decision, as it is sandwiched between Japan and the U.S. in the maritime field and between China and Russia in the land area. In addition, to solve the facing challenges, Korea should work hard and come up with policy to strengthen its exchange relationship with Russia, which is far lacking.
Abstract
This paper is to consider current pressing issues in setting up New North East Asia Culture concept. Today, conflicts among countries in North East Asia are too intense to establish New North East Asia Culture involving China, Japan, Korea and Russia. As they have a different view toward each territory, their position on such issues as missile defense and North Korea’s nuclear problem also varies, which may seriously hampers New North East Asia Culture. Therefore, the countries in North East Asia need to respond to U.S. missile defense system and North Korea nuclear problem in a long-term and forward-looking manner. And, as we can see in the relationship between China and Russia, what it appears in North East Asian countries’ friendship is different what lies within. And I started my research to find out whether it’s possible to include Russia into New North East Asia Culture. But, in the end, I cannot help but doubt whether Korea can be included in New North East Asia Culture, when it’s created. In terms of New North East Asia Culture, it will be obvious to Russia that the Far Est should be the geographic center. As for future prospects of its exchange with Korea, it’s very promising, for example establishing peace in North East Asia, reunifying North & South Koreas, securing resources in the Far Est, setting up logistics linkage to Europe, etc. But, among four main parties of New North East Asia Culture, only Russia, Japan and China except for Korea are very active in cooperation in culture, economy and politics at both public and private levels. Therefore, if Russia’s interest in Korea is far less than China and Japan, then it’s quite doubtful of Korea’s future role and position in this new North East Asia region. In addition, it’s very problematic that Korea is not duly considered in North Korea’s nuclear issue and military force competition. If Korea has just marginal influence over not only cultural, economic and political areas but also diplomatic and military areas which usually draws immediate response, then Korea will be simply dragged by other countries in New North East Asia. That’s why Korea needs to make a wise and practical decision, as it is sandwiched between Japan and the U.S. in the maritime field and between China and Russia in the land area. In addition, to solve the facing challenges, Korea should work hard and come up with policy to strengthen its exchange relationship with Russia, which is far lacking.
참고문헌 (50)
- 강원식, "러시아는 우리에게 무엇인가?" (1998)
- 고상두, "러시아의 동아시아 정책과 중국", 한국과 국제정치, 25 (1997)
- 고재남, "러시아", e-eurasia, 50
- 김병일, "댜오위다오", 센카쿠열도 문제, 2001, pp.4, ~
- 김부용, "창지투 개발의 현황과 시사점", 중국 성별 동향 브리핑, 3(17) (2012), KIEP
- 한반도 평화예측: 러시아의 전략과 영향을 중심으로, "김성진", 경기개발연구원, ~ (2005)
- 김승준, "한․러 지방자치단체간 문화교류협력 행태, 문제점 및 전망 - 한국의 해양권 지자체와 러시아 극동지역 지자체를 중심으로", 동북아 문화연구, 1(28), pp.613~635 (2011), 동북아시아문화학회
- 김세일, "신동북아 지역주의와 문화의 의미", 외국학연구, (25), pp.337~364 (2013), 외국학연구소
- 김영춘, "중국의 부상에 대한 일본의 인식과 군사력 강화", 통일정책연구, 13(1), pp.1~22 (2004), 통일연구원
- 김인성, "러시아 쿠릴열도 정책의 변화와 함의", 영토해양연구, 3 (2012), 동북아역사재단
- 김인식, "조어도 분쟁과 그 배경", 국제지역정보, 통권 : 174 (2010)
- 김정훈, "쿠릴열도 분쟁에 대한 러시아 정권의 시대별 정책", 독도연구, (14) (2013)
- 러시아 중앙정부는 극동을 어떻게 바라보는가, "빅토르 라린", ~, pp.Russia․CIS FOCUS, 제 253호
- 신범식, "러시아의 대(對)동북아 석유·가스 공급망 구축: 국제∙지역정치적 의미 및 영향에 대한 네트워크 세계정치론적 이해", 국제정치논총, 52(3), pp.341~373 (2012), 한국국제정치학회
- 양정훈, "한국의 대외정책 및 러시아와의 관계", 통일전략, 13(2), pp.227~263 (2013), 한국통일전략학회
- 러시아의 극동개발과 북한 노동자, "이영형", 통일연구원, ~, pp.KINU 정책연구시리즈 12-03
- 장덕준, "러시아의 재부상과 동북아", 아시아리뷰, 2(1) (2012)
- 전일욱, "중일 영토분쟁의 전개과정과 분쟁구조의 특징:조어도(釣魚島)를 중심으로", 평화학연구, 14(1), pp.105~124 (2013), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회
- 조윤영, "한국의 외교안보전략과 이명박 정부의 정책방향과 과제", 통일문제연구, 20(2), pp.189~222 (2008), 평화문제연구소
- 한종만, "러시아의 극동시베리아 개발과 한반도 정책", 통일문제연구, 24(2), pp.73~105 (2012), 평화문제연구소
- Putin Reconstitutes Russia’s Great Power Status, "Baev, Pavel", ~, pp.PONARS Policy Memo, № 318
- Bella B. Pak, "쿠릴열도를 둘러싼 러시아와 일본간의 영토분쟁", 독도연구, (13) (2012)
- "Дипломатический вестник, No. 9", ~ (2001)
- "Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 12 мая 2009 г. N 537 "О Стратегии национальной безопасности Российской Федерации до 2020 года""[URL]
