신동북아 지역주의와 문화의 의미
The Meaning of Culture in New Northeast Asian Regionalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This work is devoted to the opportunities and matters for the establishment of a new regionalism of Northeast Asia. At the end of the 20th century glocalization has emerged as a reaction against globalization. Glocalization is a compound phenomenon of globalization and localization in a country. As a result of glocalization various regional communities, such as the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN appeared. These organizations for regional supernational cooperation defend their own economic and regional interests and identities from various standards of global organizations like WTO, IMF and IDA. The region of Northeast Asia, however, has not yet built a regional collaborative system that provides political and economic stability to the members of the region(China, Japan, Russia and the Korean peninsula). This article analyzes the causes of the difficulties in establishing a regional collaborative system in Northeast Asia, where there are not only the most powerful economic and military force in the world, but also extremely valuable historical and cultural inheritance. The author supposes that the main cause of the past regional problems is associated with geopolitical and economic viewpoints on the region. The influence of the Cold War and the historical feud in this region gets inhibits mutual understanding and cooperation. The geopolitical and economic approaches to neighboring countries always relies on ethnocentrism. To establish a new order in this region, the author offers a cultural and dialogical approach to the knowledge of neighboring countries. For that, the author attempts to apply the following theories and concepts to the understanding of other countries: the theory of Contemporary English Culturalism, the ‘thick description’ concept of C. Geerts, and the dialogue theory of M. Bakhtin.
Abstract
This work is devoted to the opportunities and matters for the establishment of a new regionalism of Northeast Asia. At the end of the 20th century glocalization has emerged as a reaction against globalization. Glocalization is a compound phenomenon of globalization and localization in a country. As a result of glocalization various regional communities, such as the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN appeared. These organizations for regional supernational cooperation defend their own economic and regional interests and identities from various standards of global organizations like WTO, IMF and IDA. The region of Northeast Asia, however, has not yet built a regional collaborative system that provides political and economic stability to the members of the region(China, Japan, Russia and the Korean peninsula). This article analyzes the causes of the difficulties in establishing a regional collaborative system in Northeast Asia, where there are not only the most powerful economic and military force in the world, but also extremely valuable historical and cultural inheritance. The author supposes that the main cause of the past regional problems is associated with geopolitical and economic viewpoints on the region. The influence of the Cold War and the historical feud in this region gets inhibits mutual understanding and cooperation. The geopolitical and economic approaches to neighboring countries always relies on ethnocentrism. To establish a new order in this region, the author offers a cultural and dialogical approach to the knowledge of neighboring countries. For that, the author attempts to apply the following theories and concepts to the understanding of other countries: the theory of Contemporary English Culturalism, the ‘thick description’ concept of C. Geerts, and the dialogue theory of M. Bakhtin.
참고문헌 (33)
- 고병익, "동아시아 나라들의 상호 소원(疏遠)과 통합", 창작과 비평, 21(1) (1993)
- 김경일, "동아시아 국가에서 세계화와 타자의식", 정신문화연구, 25(2), pp.3~29 (2002), 한국학중앙연구원
- 김수자, "맥도날드화를 통해 본 세계화와 지구지역화", 탈경계인문학, 10 (2010), 이화인문과학원
- 문익환, "‘동아시아’ 구상과 한·중·일 관계", 창작과 비평, 21(2) (1993)
- 미하일 바흐찐, "장편소설과 민중언어" (1988), 창작과비평사
- 백영서, "20세기형 동아시아 문명과 국민국가를 넘어서", 창작과 비평, 27(4) (1999)
- 동북아 문화공동체의 동아시아 지역 확대방안을 위한 기초연구, "서중석", 통일연구원, ~ (2004)
- 스튜어트 홀, "모더니티의 미래" (2000), 현실문화연구
- 스튜어트 홀, "문화 연구의 두 가지 패러다임, In 스튜어트 홀의 문화 이론" (2010), 한나래
- 아리프 딜릭, "아시아·태평양권이라는 개념. 지역구조 창설에 있어서 현실과표상의 문제", 창작과 비평, 21(1) (1993)
- 안상욱, "세계화와 세방화 구현 - 수렴성과 다양성의 선택 -", 인문연구, (57), pp.291~316 (2009), 인문과학연구소
- 에드워드 사이드, "오리엔탈리즘" (1999), 교보문고
- 동북아 문화공동체 형성을 위한 협력적 아시아 인식의 모색, "오명석", 통일연구원, ~ (2004)
- 와다 하루끼, "동북아시아 공동의 집과 역사문제", 창작과 비평, 33(1) (2005)
- 이두환, "유럽과 러시아의 에너지 전략과천연가스 파이프라인의 정치경제학적 고찰", 한독사회과학논총, 19(4), pp.51~82 (2009), 한독사회과학회
- 李得宰, "바흐찐과 동아시아 문화연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(13), pp.29~46 (2007), 동북아시아문화학회
- 존 스토리, "문화연구와 문화이론" (1999), 현실문화연구
- 존 톰린슨, "세계화와 문화" (2004), 나남출판
- 최병관, "정신 인프라가 ‘동북아 중심’의 요체이다", 창작과 비평, 31(2) (2003)
- 최원식, "탈냉전시대와 동아시아적 시각의 모색", 창작과 비평, 21(1) (1993)
- 최진우, "문화와 정치: 유럽연합의 문화정책과 정체성의 정치", 국제정치논총, 46(4), pp.87~111 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
- 황동연, "냉전시기 미국의 지역연구와 아시아 인식", 동북아역사논총, (33), pp.15~56 (2011), 동북아역사재단
- "매일경제 경제용어사전"[URL]
- Crane, D., "Global Culture" (2002), Routledge
- Geertz, C., "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture, In Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences" (1994), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- "Global Image of the United States and China"[URL]
- "Global Opinion of Russia Mixed"[URL]
- "Japanese Public’s Mood Rebounding, Abe Highly Popular"[URL]
- Nykänen, J., "A Bakhtinian Approach to EU–Turkey Relations", Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19(4) (2011), Routledge
- McGrew, A., "A Global Society?, In Modernity and its Futures" (1992), Polity
- Robertson, R., "Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity, In Global Modernities" (1997), SAGE
- Swyngedouw, E., "‘Globalisation’ or ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, Territories and Rescaling", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1) (2004), Routledge
- "Russkiy mir"[URL]