본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparison of 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol and 45 mL of Sodium Phosphate versus 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleansing: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require the intake of large volumes of fluid. The use of 2 L PEG plus 45 mL sodium phosphate (PEG2 plus NaP) was compared with 4 L PEG (PEG4) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Methods:Patients were randomized to the PEG2 plus NaP group or PEG4 group between January 1, 2009 and March 31,2010. One hundred and thirty patients were included in the PEG2 plus NaP group, and 141 patients in the PEG4 group. Results: The qualities of the bowel preparation, based on the Ottawa scale were not significantly different between the groups (4.8±2.25 for the PEG2 plus NaP group vs. 5.11±2.26for the PEG4). In addition, there were no significant differences in side effects. Laboratory findings after bowel preparation,including electrolyte, phosphorus and creatinine levels,were within the normal ranges in both groups. Conclusions:PEG2 plus NaP provides good cleansing that is similar to PEG4, but with a lower volume. However, because PEG2 plus NaP can cause serious side effects such as calcium deposition in the kidneys (i.e., nephrocalcinosis), this solution might be considered for the outpatients who cannot tolerate PEG4.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require the intake of large volumes of fluid. The use of 2 L PEG plus 45 mL sodium phosphate (PEG2 plus NaP) was compared with 4 L PEG (PEG4) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Methods:Patients were randomized to the PEG2 plus NaP group or PEG4 group between January 1, 2009 and March 31,2010. One hundred and thirty patients were included in the PEG2 plus NaP group, and 141 patients in the PEG4 group. Results: The qualities of the bowel preparation, based on the Ottawa scale were not significantly different between the groups (4.8±2.25 for the PEG2 plus NaP group vs. 5.11±2.26for the PEG4). In addition, there were no significant differences in side effects. Laboratory findings after bowel preparation,including electrolyte, phosphorus and creatinine levels,were within the normal ranges in both groups. Conclusions:PEG2 plus NaP provides good cleansing that is similar to PEG4, but with a lower volume. However, because PEG2 plus NaP can cause serious side effects such as calcium deposition in the kidneys (i.e., nephrocalcinosis), this solution might be considered for the outpatients who cannot tolerate PEG4.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Froehlich F, "Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.378~384 (2005)
  2. Huppertz-Hauss G, "Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial", Endoscopy, 37, pp.537~541 (2005)
  3. Lapalus MG, "Capsule endoscopy and bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate: a prospective randomized controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 67, pp.1091~1096 (2008)
  4. Hsu CW, "Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation", Gastrointest Endosc, 48, pp.276~282 (1998)
  5. Juluri R, "Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 32, pp.171~181 (2010)
  6. Belsey J, "Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 25, pp.373~384 (2007)
  7. Wexner SD, "A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.894~909 (2006)
  8. Belsey J, "Systematic review: adverse event reports for oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 29, pp.15~28 (2009)
  9. Hookey LC, "The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.895~902 (2002)
  10. Park JS, "Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy", Endoscopy, 39, pp.616~619 (2007)
  11. Ell C, "Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 103, pp.883~893 (2008)
  12. Rostom A, "Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.482~486 (2004)
  13. Park SS, "Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.1319~1326 (2010)
  14. Bitoun A, "Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 24, pp.1631~1642 (2006)
  15. Adams WJ, "Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation", Dis Colon Rectum, 37, pp.229~233 (1994)
  16. 이정원, "대장내시경 전처치 4 L Polyethylene Glycol 단독요법과 2 L Polyethylene Glycol 및 Sodium Phosphate 용액 병합요법 비교", 대한소화기학회지, 56(5), pp.299~306 (2010), 대한소화기학회
  17. Siddiqui AA, "Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality", Gastrointest Endosc, 69(3 Pt 2), pp.700~706 (2009)
  18. 문장혁, "Polyethylene Glycol 용액의 복용완료시간과 대장내시경 검사시작 시간에 따른 대장 정결도의 비교", Intestinal research, 8(1), pp.24~29 (2010), 대한장연구학회
  19. Gonlusen G, "Renal failure and nephrocalcinosis associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing: clinical patterns and renal biopsy findings", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 130, pp.101~106 (2006)
  20. Markowitz GS, "Renal failure due to acute nephrocalcinosis following oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing", Hum Pathol, 35, pp.675~684 (2004)
  21. Rex DK, "Colon cleansing before colonoscopy: does oral sodium phosphate solution still make sense?", Can J Gastroenterol, 23, pp.210~214 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

대장내시경 전처치에서 4 L Polyethyleneglycol 단독투여와 45 mL Sodium Phosphate/2 L Polyethyleneglycol 병합투여의 비교: 전향적 무작위 대조 연구김용식, 김창덕, 류호상, 박상훈, 엄순호, 이범재, 이상우, 이홍식, 전훈재, 정록선, 진윤태, 천황래, 최재현, 최종환, 현종진, 현진해대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2005 · 제31권 제6호Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution김은영, Byung Ik Jang, Chang Heon Yang, Ki Young Lim, Kyeong Ok Kim, on behalf of Crohn’s and Colitis Association in Daegu-Gyeongbuk (CCAiD), Sung Kook Kim, Yoo Jin Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2023 · 제38권 제5호Does Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid Induce More Mucosal Injuries than Split-Dose 4-L PEG during Bowel Preparation?김민성, 김지연, 김태오, 김형준, 박승하, 박재현, 박종하, 양성연, 장현정, 주희린, 최준혁, 허내윤거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제2호Optimal and Safe Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy문원대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제3호A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol임윤정, 진윤태, Beom Jae Lee, Ei Rie Cho, Ji Ae Lee, Ji Yoon Kim, Jong-Jae Park, Ki Hwan Kwon, Moon Kyung Joo, Taehyun Kim, Wonjae Choi, Yu Ra Sim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제4호Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial구훈섭, 김성은, 김진옥, 김태일, 김현건, 김현수, 김효종, 명승재, 박동일, 신정은, 양동훈, 이석호, 이지성, 이창균, 장동경, 주영은, 차재명, 허규찬, 홍승필거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2015 · 제9권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)