Lichen Planus Is an Uncommon Cause of Nonspecific Proximal Esophageal Inflammation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background/Aims: Esophageal lichen planus (LP) has been described as a cause of nonspecific esophagitis that may cause dysphagia, but its incidence is unknown. We aimed to estimate the incidence of esophageal LP in a defined geographic region and describe the clinical characteristics of affected patients. Methods: A histopathology database for a population of 1 million people was searched for all esophageal mucosal biopsy results over an 8-year period. Cases showing inflammation or abnormalities without a diagnosis after three or more biopsies were reviewed for findings of LP. Results: Of 13,589 esophageal biopsies, only one received a diagnosis of LP. Seven patients (four male; mean age,59 years; range, 39 to 76 years) were identified as having chronic dysphagia and nonspecific proximal esophagitis for which no diagnosis could be made. All patients had proximal inflammation, and six of seven had full-thickness lymphocytic infiltration. Elongation of the lamina propria papillae was noted in all patients, whereas six patients had parakeratosis and ballooning. Only one patient had findings potentially consistent with, but not sufficient for, a diagnosis of esophageal LP. Conclusions: Esophageal LP appears to be extremely uncommon in this North American population, and esophageal biopsy alone is likely not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of LP.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Esophageal lichen planus (LP) has been described as a cause of nonspecific esophagitis that may cause dysphagia, but its incidence is unknown. We aimed to estimate the incidence of esophageal LP in a defined geographic region and describe the clinical characteristics of affected patients. Methods: A histopathology database for a population of 1 million people was searched for all esophageal mucosal biopsy results over an 8-year period. Cases showing inflammation or abnormalities without a diagnosis after three or more biopsies were reviewed for findings of LP. Results: Of 13,589 esophageal biopsies, only one received a diagnosis of LP. Seven patients (four male; mean age,59 years; range, 39 to 76 years) were identified as having chronic dysphagia and nonspecific proximal esophagitis for which no diagnosis could be made. All patients had proximal inflammation, and six of seven had full-thickness lymphocytic infiltration. Elongation of the lamina propria papillae was noted in all patients, whereas six patients had parakeratosis and ballooning. Only one patient had findings potentially consistent with, but not sufficient for, a diagnosis of esophageal LP. Conclusions: Esophageal LP appears to be extremely uncommon in this North American population, and esophageal biopsy alone is likely not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of LP.
참고문헌 (12)
- Moayyedi P, "Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease", Lancet, 367, pp.2086~2100 (2006)
- Katzka DA, "Variations in presentations of esophageal involvement in lichen planus", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, pp.777~782 (2010)
- Quispel R, "High prevalence of esophageal involvement in lichen planus: a study using magnification chromoendoscopy", Endoscopy, 41, pp.187~193 (2009)
- Storr M, "Nonprogressive, long-term dysphagia in a patient with esophageal lichen planus", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, pp.A24~ (2009)
- Ponsot P, "Chronic esophagitis dissecans: an unrecognized clinicopathologic entity?", Gastrointest Endosc, 45, pp.38~45 (1997)
- "Community Profiles" (2011)[URL]
- Gonzalez-Castillo S, "Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: how should we manage the disease?", J Clin Gastroenterol, 44, pp.663~671 (2010)
- Mohammed AR, "Oesophageal lichen planus: a missed diagnosis", J R Soc Med, 99, pp.318~320 (2006)
- Dickens CM, "The oesophagus in lichen planus: an endoscopic study", BMJ, 300, pp.84~ (1990)
- Westbrook R, "Esophageal lichen planus: case report and literature review", Dysphagia, 23, pp.331~334 (2008)
- Chandan VS, "Esophageal lichen planus", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 132, pp.1026~1029 (2008)
- Allende DS, "Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease: the pathologist’s perspective", Adv Anat Pathol, 16, pp.161~165 (2009)
