Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Chronic Diarrhea: A Korean Multicenter CAPENTRY Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: In some cases, chronic diarrhea is unexplained, and small bowel disorders may be one of the causes. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in patients with chronic diarrhea. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records from October 2002 to August 2013 in the VCE nationwide database registry (n=2,964). Ninety-one patients from 15 medical centers (60 males and 31 females; mean age, 47±19 years) were evaluated for VCE as a result of chronic diarrhea. Results: The duration of chronic diarrhea was 8.3±14.7 months. The positive diagnostic yield of VCE was 42.9% (39/91). However, 15.4% (14/91) exhibited an inconsistent result, and 41.8% (38/91) were negative. Abnormal findings consistent with chronic diarrhea included erosions/aphthous ulcers (19.8%), ulcers (17.6%), mucosal erythema (3.3%), edema (1.1%), and luminal narrowing (1.1%). The most common diagnoses were functional diarrhea associated with irritable bowel syndrome in 37 patients (40.7%) and Crohn’s disease in 18 patients (19.8%). After VCE examination, the diagnosis was changed in 34.1% of the patients (31/91). Hematochezia (odds ratio [OR], 8.802; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.126 to 36.441) and hypoalbuminemia (OR, 4.811; 95% CI, 1.241 to 18.655) are predictive factors of a positive diagnostic yield. Conclusions: VCE had a favorable diagnostic yield and clinical impact on the management of patients with chronic diarrhea.
Abstract
Background/Aims: In some cases, chronic diarrhea is unexplained, and small bowel disorders may be one of the causes. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in patients with chronic diarrhea. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records from October 2002 to August 2013 in the VCE nationwide database registry (n=2,964). Ninety-one patients from 15 medical centers (60 males and 31 females; mean age, 47±19 years) were evaluated for VCE as a result of chronic diarrhea. Results: The duration of chronic diarrhea was 8.3±14.7 months. The positive diagnostic yield of VCE was 42.9% (39/91). However, 15.4% (14/91) exhibited an inconsistent result, and 41.8% (38/91) were negative. Abnormal findings consistent with chronic diarrhea included erosions/aphthous ulcers (19.8%), ulcers (17.6%), mucosal erythema (3.3%), edema (1.1%), and luminal narrowing (1.1%). The most common diagnoses were functional diarrhea associated with irritable bowel syndrome in 37 patients (40.7%) and Crohn’s disease in 18 patients (19.8%). After VCE examination, the diagnosis was changed in 34.1% of the patients (31/91). Hematochezia (odds ratio [OR], 8.802; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.126 to 36.441) and hypoalbuminemia (OR, 4.811; 95% CI, 1.241 to 18.655) are predictive factors of a positive diagnostic yield. Conclusions: VCE had a favorable diagnostic yield and clinical impact on the management of patients with chronic diarrhea.
참고문헌 (17)
- Juckett G, "Evaluation of chronic diarrhea", Am Fam Physician, 84, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
- Murray JA, "Diarrhoea due to small bowel diseases", Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 26, pp.581~600 (2012)
- Pennazio M, "Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline", Endoscopy, 47, pp.352~376 (2015)
- Bardan E, "Capsule endoscopy for the evaluation of patients with chronic abdominal pain", Endoscopy, 35, pp.688~689 (2003)
- Keuchel M, "Video capsule endoscopy in the work-up of abdominal pain", Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 14, pp.195~205 (2004)
- Yang L, "Increased diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain", PLoS One, 9, pp.e87396~ (2014)
- Egnatios J, "Video capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without associated symptoms: a retrospective study", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0126509~ (2015)
- May A, "Prospective multicenter trial of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea and other signs and symptoms (CEDAP-Plus Study)", Endoscopy, 39, pp.606~612 (2007)
- Katsinelos P, "Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without diarrhea: a Greek multicenter study", Eur J Intern Med, 22, pp.e63~e66 (2011)
- Cappellini MD, "Anemia in clinical practice-definition and classification: does hemoglobin change with aging", Semin Hematol, 52, pp.261~269 (2015)
- Rondonotti E, "Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 22, pp.1380~1386 (2010)
- Kalantzis N, "Capsule endoscopy; the cumulative experience from its use in 193 patients with suspected small bowel disease", Hepatogastroenterology, 52, pp.414~419 (2005)
- Katsinelos P, "Can capsule endoscopy be used as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of nonbleeding indications in daily clinical practice? A prospective study", Med Princ Pract, 20, pp.362~367 (2011)
- Freitas GP, "Capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: four years of experience from a single center", Arq Gastroenterol, 48, pp.220~222 (2011)
- Petruzziello C, "Small bowel capsule endoscopy vs conventional techniques in patients with symptoms highly compatible with Crohn’s disease", J Crohns Colitis, 5, pp.139~147 (2011)
- 박수경, "Guidelines for Video Capsule Endoscopy: Emphasis on Crohn’s Disease", Clinical Endoscopy, 48(2), pp.128~135 (2015), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Shim KN, "Abdominal pain accompanied by weight loss may increase the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a Korean multicenter study", Scand J Gastroenterol, 41, pp.983~988 (2006)