Does Back-To-Back Capsule Endoscopy Increase the Diagnostic Yield over a Single Examination in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background/Aims: Video capsule endoscopy (CE)can provide a negative result despite the presence of clinically significant small-bowel lesions. We therefore performed a prospective study to elucidate whether repeated back-to-back CE increases the diagnostic yield over a single CE in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Methods: Sixteen patients with OGIB were prospectively enrolled and underwent back-to-back CE investigation with a 24-hour interval. All CE videos were interpreted by two experienced readers at a maximum 15 frames/second in a random order. Results: The diagnostic yield of the single CE was 37.5% for the first CE, 43.8% for the second CE, and 62.5% for the back-to-back CE. The overall mean lesion-detection rates of the first and second CEs were 42.2% and 64.6%, respectively. The bowel preparation status of the second CE was improved in 37.5% and unchanged in 62.5% of cases as compared with that of the first CE. Conclusions:These results indicate that back-to-back CE may increase the diagnostic yield and lesion-detection rate over a single CE in patients with OGIB. Therefore, if the first CE is not diagnostic in a patient with OGIB,repeat back-to-back CE may be considered as a candidate for further workup.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Video capsule endoscopy (CE)can provide a negative result despite the presence of clinically significant small-bowel lesions. We therefore performed a prospective study to elucidate whether repeated back-to-back CE increases the diagnostic yield over a single CE in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Methods: Sixteen patients with OGIB were prospectively enrolled and underwent back-to-back CE investigation with a 24-hour interval. All CE videos were interpreted by two experienced readers at a maximum 15 frames/second in a random order. Results: The diagnostic yield of the single CE was 37.5% for the first CE, 43.8% for the second CE, and 62.5% for the back-to-back CE. The overall mean lesion-detection rates of the first and second CEs were 42.2% and 64.6%, respectively. The bowel preparation status of the second CE was improved in 37.5% and unchanged in 62.5% of cases as compared with that of the first CE. Conclusions:These results indicate that back-to-back CE may increase the diagnostic yield and lesion-detection rate over a single CE in patients with OGIB. Therefore, if the first CE is not diagnostic in a patient with OGIB,repeat back-to-back CE may be considered as a candidate for further workup.
참고문헌 (20)
- Triester SL, "A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding", Am J Gastroenterol, 1000, pp.2407~2418 (2005)
- Mergener K, "Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts: consensus statements for small-bowelcapsule endoscopy, 2006", 2007, 2007, pp.39, 895~909
- Mishkin DS, "ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless capsule endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.539~545 (2006)
- Rey JF, "European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Video capsule endoscopy: update to guidelines (May 2006)", Endoscopy, 38, pp.1047~1053 (2006)
- Cass OW, "Is half-knowledge worse than ignorance?", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.542~543 (2006)
- Gerber J, "A capsule endoscopy guide for the practicing clinician: technology and troubleshooting", Gastrointest Endosc, 66, pp.1188~1195 (2007)
- Clarke JO, "How good is capsule endoscopy for detection of periampullary lesions? Results of a tertiary-referral center", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.267~272 (2008)
- Kong H, "Limited ability of capsule endoscopy to detect normally positioned duodenal papilla", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.538~541 (2006)
- Delvaux M, "Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 12 months", Endoscopy, 36, pp.1067~1073 (2004)
- Hartmann D, "A prospective two-center study comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with intraoperative enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.826~832 (2005)
- Raju GS, "American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.1697~1717 (2007)
- Cave DR, "A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.487~494 (2008)
- Hartmann D, "Diagnosis of small-bowel pathology using paired capsule endoscopy with two different devices: a randomized study", Endoscopy, 39, pp.1041~1045 (2007)
- Korman LY, "Capsule endoscopy structured terminology (CEST): proposal of a standardizedand structured terminology for reporting capsule endoscopyprocedures", Endoscopy, 37, pp.951~959 (2005)
- Delvaux M, "Structured terminology for capsule endoscopy: results of retrospective testing and validation in 766 small-bowel investigations", Endoscopy, 37, pp.945~950 (2005)
- Lewis BS, "Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.349~353 (2002)
- Nakamura M, "Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding", Endoscopy, 38, pp.59~66 (2006)
- Hadithi M, "A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.52~57 (2006)
- Matsumoto T, "Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis", Endoscopy, 37, pp.827~832 (2005)
- Kameda N, "A prospective, single- blind trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding", J Gastroenterol, 43, pp.434~440 (2008)