본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Influencing Factors on Bicycle Trips: A Comparison of a Metropolitan City to Suburban Cities

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Due to the advantages of bicycles as a sustainable transportation mode, local governments are increasing efforts on the development of bicycle master plans. Some research recently started supporting these efforts by investigating the factors that influence bicycle trips. However, a generic approach that covers a large metropolitan area may not accurately capture the factors influencing bicycle trips since the approach covers a large geographical extent with different levels of land use hierarchy, a mixture of different demographic characteristics, and a variety of physical environmental conditions. To address this consideration, this study classifies the Los Angeles metropolitan area into two areas by the hierarchy of city scale; a metropolitan city (Los Angeles) and suburban cities (Covina and Pomona). This paper then examines the unique attributes that influence bicycling in a metropolitan city and suburban cities. The results of the examination clearly suggest that there are distinct differences between the factors of the metropolitan city and the suburban cities. The land use and physical environment factors contribute to the bicycle trips in the metropolitan city, while demographic characteristics including population density and income are significant factors on suburban bicycle trips. The findings of this paper can support local governments to develop customized bicycle planning strategies by the hierarchy of city scale.

Abstract

Due to the advantages of bicycles as a sustainable transportation mode, local governments are increasing efforts on the development of bicycle master plans. Some research recently started supporting these efforts by investigating the factors that influence bicycle trips. However, a generic approach that covers a large metropolitan area may not accurately capture the factors influencing bicycle trips since the approach covers a large geographical extent with different levels of land use hierarchy, a mixture of different demographic characteristics, and a variety of physical environmental conditions. To address this consideration, this study classifies the Los Angeles metropolitan area into two areas by the hierarchy of city scale; a metropolitan city (Los Angeles) and suburban cities (Covina and Pomona). This paper then examines the unique attributes that influence bicycling in a metropolitan city and suburban cities. The results of the examination clearly suggest that there are distinct differences between the factors of the metropolitan city and the suburban cities. The land use and physical environment factors contribute to the bicycle trips in the metropolitan city, while demographic characteristics including population density and income are significant factors on suburban bicycle trips. The findings of this paper can support local governments to develop customized bicycle planning strategies by the hierarchy of city scale.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. An, M., "Estimating Nonmotorized Travel Demand", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, pp.18~25 (2007)
  2. Beckman, J., "Immigration, Residential Location, Car Ownership, and Commuting Behavior: A Multivariate Latent Class Analysis from California", Transportation, 35(5), pp.655~671 (2008)
  3. Cervero, R., "Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogota", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3, pp.203~226 (2009)
  4. Cervero, R., "Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design", Transport and Environment, 2(3), pp.199~219 (1997)
  5. Dill, J., "Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, pp.116~123 (2003)
  6. Dill, J., "Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice" (2008), Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium
  7. Dill, J., "Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand: Initial Survey Findings from the Portland, Oregon Region", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2031, pp.9~17 (2007)
  8. Dill, J., "Factors Affecting Worksite Mode Choice", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1994, pp.51~57 (2007)
  9. Griswold, J. B, "Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2247), pp.1~7 (2011)
  10. Handy, S. L., "Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(2), pp.91~110 (2011)
  11. Jones, M., "Estimating Bicycle and Pedestrian Demand in San Diego", 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (2008)
  12. Kim, D., "Bicycle Facility Demanding Analysis using GIS: A Case of Los Angeles County", An International Journal of Urban and Extra Urban Studies, 1(2), pp.1~14 (2011)
  13. Travel Behavior and Built Environment: Exploring the Importance of Urban Design at the Non-Residential End of the Trip, "Kuzmyak, R. J.", Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, ~, pp.Working Paper WP12RK1 (2012)
  14. 2011Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Report, "Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition", ~ (2012)
  15. Morris, H., "Commute Rates on Urban Trails: Indicators from the 2000 Census", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1878, pp.116~121 (2004)
  16. Parkin, J, "Estimation of the Determinants of Bicycle Mode Share for the Journey to Work using Census Data", Transportation: Planning, Policy, Research, Practice, 35(1), pp.93~109 (2008)
  17. Pucher, J., "Walking and Cycling for Healthy Cities", Built Environment, 36(4), pp.391~414 (2010)
  18. Pucher, J., "Infrastructure, Programs and Policies to Increase Bicycling: An International Review", Preventive Medicine, 48(2), pp.106~125 (2010)
  19. Saelens, B.E., "Built Environment Correlates of Walking: A Review", Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, 40(7), pp.550~566 (2008)
  20. Saelens, B. E., "Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings from the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures", Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), pp.80~91 (2003)
  21. Stinson, M. A., "Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, pp.107~115 (2003)
  22. Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Avidence, "Transportation Research Board", ~ (2005)
  23. Evaluating the Accessibility of Residential Areas for Bicycling and Walking Using GIS, "Ulmer, J.", Center for Transportation Studies at the University of Virginia, ~, pp.Research Report UVACTS-5-14-64 (2003)
  24. Witten, K., "Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity:Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand", Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7), pp.971~977 (2012)
  25. Zacharias, J., "Non-motorized Transportation in Four Shanghai Districts", International Planning Studies, 10(3), pp.323~340 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)