Exploring the Impact of Trip-Chaining on Commute Mode Choice in the U.S.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to explore trip-chaining and its impact on commute mode choice using datafrom the 2017 U.S. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). This study defines trip-chaining asa complex work tour where non-work activities (i.e., shopping/family errands, medical services,school/daycare/religious activity, social/recreational activity) are conducted on the journeybetween home and work. We first analyze the trip-chaining characteristics by simply assessingthe descriptive statistics. We then employ a multinomial logistic regression model to examinethe determinants of commute mode choice and the impact of trip-chaining. Key findings fromour empirical analyses are as follows. First, women make more non-work trips than men whilecommuting, and men and women have more chained trips after work. Second, they usually havechained trips to drop off/pick up other individuals, buy meals, and buy goods while commuting. Third, women are more likely to prefer driving alone over public transit and walking/cycling. Fourth, urban neighborhoods are more likely to make individuals use public transit, walking/cycling, and carpooling. Lastly, trip-chaining can act as a barrier to public transit and walking/cycling.
Abstract
This study aims to explore trip-chaining and its impact on commute mode choice using datafrom the 2017 U.S. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). This study defines trip-chaining asa complex work tour where non-work activities (i.e., shopping/family errands, medical services,school/daycare/religious activity, social/recreational activity) are conducted on the journeybetween home and work. We first analyze the trip-chaining characteristics by simply assessingthe descriptive statistics. We then employ a multinomial logistic regression model to examinethe determinants of commute mode choice and the impact of trip-chaining. Key findings fromour empirical analyses are as follows. First, women make more non-work trips than men whilecommuting, and men and women have more chained trips after work. Second, they usually havechained trips to drop off/pick up other individuals, buy meals, and buy goods while commuting. Third, women are more likely to prefer driving alone over public transit and walking/cycling. Fourth, urban neighborhoods are more likely to make individuals use public transit, walking/cycling, and carpooling. Lastly, trip-chaining can act as a barrier to public transit and walking/cycling.
참고문헌 (23)
- Adler, T. J., "Joint-choice model for frequency, destination, and travel mode for shopping trips", Transportation Research Record, (569) (1976)
- Akar, G., "Influence of neighborhood types on trip distances : Spatial error models for Central Ohio", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3), pp.284~293 (2016)
- Chen, Y. J., "Using trip chaining and joint travel as mediating variables to explore the relationships among travel behavior, socio-demographics, and urban form", Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), pp.573~588 (2017)
- Crane, R., "Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting", Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), pp.298~316 (2007)
- Duncan, M., "How much can trip chaining reduce VMT? A simplified method", Transportation, 43(4), pp.643~659 (2016)
- Ewing, R., "Measuring the unmeasurable : Urban design qualities related to walkability", Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), pp.65~84 (2009)
- Fan, Y., "Household structure and gender differences in travel time : spouse", partner presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status, 2017, pp.44(2), 271~291
- Golob, T. F., "The trip chaining activity of Sydney residents : a cross-section assessment by age group with a focus on seniors", Journal of Transport Geography, 15(4), pp.298~312 (2007)
- Gordon, P., "Beyond the journey to work", Transportation Research Part A : General, 22(6), pp.419~426 (1988)
- Hensher, D. A., "Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport", Transportation, 27(4), pp.341~361 (2000)
- Kwon, K., "Have the gender differences in commuting been shrinking or persistent? Evidence from two-earner households in the US", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(12), pp.1121~1130 (2022)
- Lee, Y., "Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 41(10), pp.1004~1020 (2007)
- McGuckin, N., "Examining trip-chaining behavior : Comaprison of travel by men and women", Transportation Resarch Record, 1693(1), pp.79~85 (1999)
- McGuckin, N., "Trip-chaining trends in the United States : understanding travel behavior for policy making", Transportation Research Record, 1917(1), pp.199~204 (2005)
- Namgung, M., "Role of gender and attitudes on public transportation use", Transportation Research Record, 2415(1), pp.136~144 (2014)
- Noland, R. B., "Multivariate analysis of trip-chaining behavior", Environment and Planning B : Planning and Design, 34(6), pp.953~970 (2007)
- Primerano, F., "Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour", Transportation, 35(1), pp.55~72 (2008)
- Understanding women’s and men’s travel patterns: the research challenge. Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, "Rosenbloom, S.", Transportation Research Board of the National Academics, ~ (2004)
- Schmöcker, J. D., "An analysis of trip chaining among older London residents", Transportation, 37(1), pp.105~123 (2010)
- Understanding trip chaining, 1990 NPTS Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes, "Strathman, J. G.", FHWA. US Department of Transportation, ~, pp.Publication FHWA-PL-95-033 (1995)
- "2017 National Household Travel Survey" (2017)[URL]
- Wallace, B., "Evaluating the effects of travelers and trip characteristics on trip chaining, with implications for transportation demand management strategies", Transportation Research Record, 1718(1), pp.97~106 (2000)
- Ye, X., "An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns", Transportation Research Part B : Methodological, 41(1), pp.96~113 (2007)