現代日本語における知覚表明文の非ノダとノダ -「入力情報の処理過程」の観点から-
A study on the statement of perception in Japanese:non-noda and noda From the viewpoint of 'Input Information Processing'
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to reveal the differences between non-noda and noda,which refer to what the speaker percepts at the time of speech and in the place of speech. Both non-noda and noda have 'the realstic description usage', which indicates as it is what the speaker percepts at the time of speech and in the place of speech and 'the provocated statement usage', which indicates what is provocated by the speaker's perception. We can observe the differences between non-noda and noda in co-occurrence relation with exclaminations. and thus "no-understanding exclaminations" like 'att','otto' etc. tend to cooccur with non-noda, not noda and "understanding exclaminations" like 'aa', 'naruhodo' etc. tend to cooccur with noda, not non-noda. Based on the obserbation of co-occurrence relation above, we can assume "Input information proccessing" such as the stage1:'encountering unknown infomation'→the stage2:'searching related information'→the stage3:'linking unknown information to related information'. this paper, therefore, proposes that non-noda refers to the stage1:'encountering unknown infomation' and noda refers to the stage2:'linking unknown information to related information'.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to reveal the differences between non-noda and noda,which refer to what the speaker percepts at the time of speech and in the place of speech. Both non-noda and noda have 'the realstic description usage', which indicates as it is what the speaker percepts at the time of speech and in the place of speech and 'the provocated statement usage', which indicates what is provocated by the speaker's perception. We can observe the differences between non-noda and noda in co-occurrence relation with exclaminations. and thus "no-understanding exclaminations" like 'att','otto' etc. tend to cooccur with non-noda, not noda and "understanding exclaminations" like 'aa', 'naruhodo' etc. tend to cooccur with noda, not non-noda. Based on the obserbation of co-occurrence relation above, we can assume "Input information proccessing" such as the stage1:'encountering unknown infomation'→the stage2:'searching related information'→the stage3:'linking unknown information to related information'. this paper, therefore, proposes that non-noda refers to the stage1:'encountering unknown infomation' and noda refers to the stage2:'linking unknown information to related information'.
참고문헌 (17)
- 庵功雄, "中級を教えるための日本語文法ハンドブック, In 白川博之監修" (2000), スリーエーネットワーク
- 定延利之, "談話における心的操作モニター機構－心的操作標識｢ええと｣と｢あの（－）", 言語研究, 108, pp.74~93 (1995), 日本言語学会
- 田野村忠温, "文における判断をめぐって, In アジア諸言語と一般言語学", pp.785~795 (1990), 三省堂
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味第Ⅱ卷" (1984), くろしお出版
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称" (1991), ひつじ書房
- 仁田義雄, "第2章認識のモダリティとその周辺, In 日本語の文法3モダリティ 森山卓郎他" (2000), 岩波書店
- 田窪行則, "日本語の構造 推論と知識管理" (2010), くろしお出版
- 田窪行則, "応答詞・感動詞の談話的機能, In 文法と音声", pp.257~279 (1997), くろしお出版
- 冨樫純一, "談話標識｢ふーん｣の機能", 日本語文法, 2(2), pp.95~111 (2002), 日本語文法学会
- 名嶋義直, "ノダの意味・機能－関連性理論の観点から-" (2007), くろしお出版
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法7第12部談話第13部待遇表現" (2009), くろしお出版
- 丹羽哲也, "有題文と無題文、現象(描写)文、助詞｢が｣の問題(上・下), In 国語国文第五十七巻第六･七号", pp.41~ (1988), 京都大学文学部国語国文学研究室
- 野田春美, "｢の(だ)｣の機能" (1997), くろしお出版
- 三尾砂, "國語法文章論" (1948), 三省堂
- 森山卓郎, "情動的感動詞考", 語文, 65, pp.51~62 (1996), 大阪大学国語国文学会
- 森山卓郎, "引き延ばし音調について, In 文法と音声Ⅳ", pp.231~255 (2004), くろしお出版
- 森山卓郎, "動作発動の感動詞｢さあ｣｢それ｣をめぐって", 日本語文法, 2(2), pp.128~143 (2002), 日本語文法学会