ノダ 사용의 기준 -‘ノダ 사용이 필수적인 경우’를 중심으로-

Abstract

This thesis has taken a look at what standard the term NODA has been used. The intrinsic feature of NODA is based on 「NODA is the mark intentionally presented to the listeners [Interpretation on Schematic Knowledge of Speaker] regarding the premises」 as presented by Lee Jin-kyoung (2024). The type of NODA follows 3 types following ‘level of requirement’, presented by Najima (2007), and the focus is on a-type that has to use NODA at all times. What NODA intends to convey is the type of relationship that would be the internal stability that NODA has in ‘schematic knowledge of speaker’. In other words, it should be whether there if any change to the existing schematic knowledge due to the perceived situation, and if there exists any change, what type of change (addition or reinforcement), and if there is no change, what intent would it be conveyed. The schematic knowledge as the core intrinsic value may be shown for ‘confirmation of fact, assuring discretion, subjective assessment’ depending on its characteristics, and depending on the relationship with the speaker, the subject of discretion may be shown for ‘internal aspect (uchi) with relationship with the speaker and external aspect (soto) without relationship with the speaker’. Also, it may be considered in connection with the functions under the perspective of generation and delivery of schematic knowledge. Under this article, the focus is on the a-type of Najima (2007) on the basis of such a standard to make the comparative analysis and the result is shown as follows. The a-type as presented by Najima (2007) has the change of schematic knowledge that is led to the function of ≪discovery≫ and it contains the characteristics for ‘confirmation of fact, assuring discretion, subjective assessment’ but the relationship (uchi and soto) with the speaker is not consistent. On the other hand, the a-type analyzed by this article has one that may have no change of schematic knowledge and it leads to the function of ≪discovery≫ and ≪description≫ in the perspective of generation and delivery. The one with the change of schematic knowledge is the case of newly acquiring the knowledge (addition) and one without the change of knowledge has the focus on delivering the existing knowledge. In the characteristic aspect, all three types appeared and the relational type with the speaker for each characteristic has appeared as well. However, in the aspect of ‘confirmation of fact’, change of knowledge appears the objective and subjective ones depending on the method of acquiring the schematic knowledge, but the one without the change of knowledge is appeared only the subjective one with direct and indirect experience of the speaker. As a result of taking a look at the foregoing, as a result of interpreting in relation to the schematic knowledge of the speaker and the situation acknowledged for NODA, the schematic knowledge has to be used regardless of the relationship with the speaker when it is delivered as the schematic knowledge is newly generated or the schematic knowledge contains of its own as generated by direct and indirect experience of the speaker.