일본인 대학생 대화에 나타난 「思う」의 헷지용법 - 친소차과 성차에 주목하여 -
The usage of ‘omou’ as hedge in conversation between Japanese university students: focusing on degree of intimacy and gender
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本研究では日本人の大学生の会話に見られる「思う」の使用様相をヘッ ジ用法を中心に親疎要因と性別要因と絡めて調べてみた。本研究を通して 「思う」は実際の会話の中で「思考動詞」としてより自分の意見を直接か つ断定的に表出せず発話を和らげる「ヘッジ」として多く使われているこ とが分かった。ヘッジとして使われる「思う」は、性別とは関係なく友達同士の会話より初対面の会話において使用割合が高く、これあ心的距離感 のある初対面の相手に対して断定的に自分の意見を言うことを回避するこ とで、相手を配慮するための言語的な方略とも解釈することができる。一 方、ヘッジ用法の「思う」はすべて引用助詞と共起しており、さらに断定 回避の意味を強化するために「たぶん」のような不確実性を示す副詞と共 起することもあった。また、ヘッジ用法の「思う」は、主に私的な情報を 表す状況で使われていることも明らかになった。
Abstract
This study investigated the usage of “Omou” focused on the function of hedge. This study examined for which functions “Omou” are used in conversations by analyzing conversations of native Japanese university students who are in their 20s. The conversation took place among friends of the same age and first meeting students. The use of "Omou" was divided into “Thinking verb” and “Hedge”. The results of the usage of "Omou" discussed in this study are summarized as follows.In both conversations between friends and first meeting students regardless of gender, it found that ‘Omou’ was used more as ‘Hedge’ than ‘Thinking verb’. The ratio of use of ‘omou’ as hedge was higher in the conversation between first meeting than in the conversation between friends regardless of gender. It can be interpreted as a linguistic strategy for consideration to talking partner in their first meeting .The ‘omou’ as hedge was used together with the quoting particles and was used together with adverbs that showed uncertainty such as "tabun" in order to strengthen the meaning of the avoidance of assertion. Also, it can be seen that ‘omou’ as hedge was mainly used in the situation of showing private information.
참고문헌 (20)
- 유미진, "文末思考動詞「思う」のモリティ性について", 일본학보, 46, pp.55~71 (2001), 한국일본학회
- 이봉, "「思う」と「생각하다」のヘッジ(hedge)としての 機能について", 일본어학연구, (25), pp.143~156 (2009), 한국일본어학회
- 李鳳, "ポライトネス・ストラテジーとしての「思う」と「생각하다」―指示型の発語内の力を持つ文において―", 日本文化學報, (64), pp.169~182 (2015), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 이은미, "ポライトネスの観点から見た「思う」のヘッジ性", 일본학보, (83), pp.125~135 (2010), 한국일본학회
- 이은미, "한일 양국의 대학생 친구 간 대화에 나타나는 헷지의 사용양상", 일본어학연구, (42), pp.207~223 (2014), 한국일본어학회
- 이은미, "한일 양국의 사회인 친소간 대화에 나타나는 헷지의 사용양상", 일본언어문화, (28), pp.359~374 (2014), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 이은미, "일본인 남자대학생 대화에 나타난「とか」의 담화상의 기능", 일어일문학연구, 98(1), pp.191~207 (2016), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 李政洙, "日本語 「と思う」의 韓國語 飜譯에 관한 硏究", 석사, 일본어통번역, pp.1997
- 이종화, "現代日本語における婉曲表現の硏究", 博士, pp.2005
- 임영철, "한국어와 일본어 그리고 일본인과의 커뮤니케이션" (2008), 태학사
- 정하준, "と思う의 번역례 연구", 日本語文學, (31), pp.289~308 (2006), 한국일본어문학회
- 小野正樹, "ポライトネスからみた「ト思う」について-一人の作家の対談分析を通じて-", 西武文理大学研究紀要, (創刊), pp.43~53 (2000)
- 小野正樹, "日本語態度動詞文の情報構造" (2005), ひつじ書房
- TAKAHASHI MIHO, "思考動詞「思う」のモーダル化 -引用構文との比較を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 94(1), pp.333~351 (2015), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 水谷信子, "話しことばのコミュニケーション" (1988), 凡人社
- 森山卓郎, "文末思考動詞『思う』をめぐって―文の意味としての主観性・客観性 ―", 日本語学, 11(9), pp.105~116 (1992), 明治書院
- 中右実, "認知意味論の原理" (1994), 大修館書店
- Brown, P., "Politeness Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Holmes, Janet, "Women, men and politeness" (1995), Longman
- Lauwereyns, Shizuka, "Hedges in Japanese Spoken Discourse: A comparison Between Younger and Older Speakers", Ph.D., pp.2000