본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

김환태의 日本 九州大學 학위 논문에 나타난 매슈 아놀드의 비평 연구

A Study on the Critical theory of Matthew Arnold in the Kim Hwan-Tae's graduation thesis of Ku Ju Imperial University

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The literary critic Kim Hwan Tae majored in English Literature at the KuJu Imperial University. It was there that he began to formilate his views on literature and literary criticism. His well known graduation thesis, “Matthew Arnold and Walter Pater as Literary Critics” levels unsolved the ambiguity of why he chose such a topic for research. However, it is a well- known fact that the Japanese literary world of the nineteen thirties was influenced greatly by western literary movements, and it is clear that his literary and critical theory was formulated as a direct result of his research of Arnold and Pater. Kim Hwan Tae emphasized the following three point: First, ‘The Critical power is of lower rank than the creative. second, He integrated Arnond's concept of disinterestedness as the origin of criticism and used this position to oppose proletarian literature. Third, He asserted that poetry is at bottom a criticism of life; that the greatness of a poet lies in his powerful and beautiful application of ideas to life, -to the question: How to live.’

Abstract

The literary critic Kim Hwan Tae majored in English Literature at the KuJu Imperial University. It was there that he began to formilate his views on literature and literary criticism. His well known graduation thesis, “Matthew Arnold and Walter Pater as Literary Critics” levels unsolved the ambiguity of why he chose such a topic for research. However, it is a well- known fact that the Japanese literary world of the nineteen thirties was influenced greatly by western literary movements, and it is clear that his literary and critical theory was formulated as a direct result of his research of Arnold and Pater. Kim Hwan Tae emphasized the following three point: First, ‘The Critical power is of lower rank than the creative. second, He integrated Arnond's concept of disinterestedness as the origin of criticism and used this position to oppose proletarian literature. Third, He asserted that poetry is at bottom a criticism of life; that the greatness of a poet lies in his powerful and beautiful application of ideas to life, -to the question: How to live.’

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김환태, "Matthew Arnold and Walter Pater as Literary Critics" (1934), 九州大
  2. 김환태, "김환태의 九州大 학적부", ~
  3. "九州帝國大學 英文學會會報", 英文學會會報, (5) (1935)
  4. "九州帝國大學 法文學部 講義題目(1931. 제1학기~1933.제2학기)", ~ (1933)
  5. 권영민, "김환태가 남긴 문학유산", pp.72~ (2004), 문학사상사
  6. 김기림, "1933년의 시단의 회고와 전망", 조선일보, ~ (1933), 1933.12.7-13일자
  7. 김양옥, "김환태 비평 연구", 석사, pp.1984
  8. 김환태, "김환태전집", pp.17~ (1988), 문학사상사
  9. 김효정, "김환태 비평 연구", 석사, pp.1994
  10. 윤지관, "근대사회의 교양과 비평", pp.13~317 (1995), 창작과 비평사
  11. 이기영, "문예평론가, 창작비평가", 조선일보, ~ (1934), 1934. 2. 3일자
  12. 이은애, "김환태의 인상주의 비평연구", 석사, pp.1985
  13. 이은애, "이데올로기의 늪에서 핀 ‘순수문학’에의 열정", 서정시학, (여름), pp.218~230 (2010)
  14. 최인자, "김환태 인상주의 비평의 미학적 원리와 그 문학 교육적 의미", 국어국문학, (115)통권 : 12, pp.142~ (1995)
  15. 최재서, "문학원론", pp.1~356 (1957), 춘조사
  16. Matthew Arnold, "Essays in Criticism", pp.133~ (1935), 硏究社
  17. Mattew Arnold, "Preface to the First Edition of Poems(1853) in Poetry and Criticism of Matthew Arnold", pp.202~205 (1961), Houghton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)