본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기록문화가 형성한 소설담론 공간의 리얼리티 - <신조합평회>와 <조선문단합평회>를 중심으로 -

Reality on the Discourse of Fiction Formed by the Records Culture - Focusing on “the Symposium Sponsored by Shincho” and “the Symposium Sponsored by Choseonmundan” -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

この研究は韓国と日本で新しい小説方法論の探求が起きた1920年代を中心に、既成文壇と新進作家グループでの談論が実証的に集積された「合評会」という記録形式に注目する。そして、この「合評会」を小説方法論の談論トポス(topos)として規定し、その特質を明らかにしようと試みた。方法的には「合評会」という文字化されたテクスト記録から「誰が記録しているのか」に注目し、3人称と1人称の問題を「事実」と「フィクション」の混在として置換することで、1920年代の韓国と日本の「小説方法論に対するパラダイムシフト」を考察した。その結果、日本の近代小説は「ありのままに描く」の矛盾を目の当たりにすることで、実況中継者としての語り手の「事実」が構築できた。そして、韓国の近代小説は現実の世界からフィクションの世界を眺められる小説家の認識を基に「フィクション」を軸にする「事実」の小説方法が構築された。

Abstract

This study focuses on the 1920s, when the exploration of new novel methodologies took place in Korea and Japan. And the record format of “the symposium” in which discourses exchanged between established literary circles and groups of emerging artists were integrated, was considered. In addition, this joint review was defined as the discourse of “topos” of the novel methodology and attempted to clarify its characteristics. First of all, the researcher started with the question of ‘who is recording’ that a written text record, “the symposium”. And then, the problem of the third person and the first person was replaced in terms of a mixture of ‘fact’ and ‘fiction’, and the ‘paradigm shift of novel’s methodology’ between Korea and Japan in the 1920s was considered. As a result, Japanese modern novels confirmed the impossibility of ‘translating reality as it is’ and was able to establish a viewpoint as a live broadcaster. On the other hand, modern Korean novels have established a novel method that gives the ‘fact’ nature of ‘fiction’ based on the novelist’s perception of looking at the fiction world in the real world.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 김종길, "월간 문학 1", pp.253~ (1968), 월간문학사
  2. 신지영, "부재의 시대 : 근대계몽기 및 식민지기 조선의 연설․좌담회", pp.228~234 (2015), 소명출판
  3. 정윤성, "속간 『조선문단』의 배경과 특수성", 한국학연구, (62), pp.299~326 (2021), 한국학연구소
  4. 최서해, "조선문단합평회:제1회이월소설창작총평", 조선문단, (6), pp.116~ (1925), 조선문단사
  5. 安藤宏, "日本文学の表現構造", pp.157~ (2014), 岩波書店
  6. 酒井浩介, "トラブルとして記録される会話 : 新潮合評会に見る座談会の批評性", 日本文学, 58(12), pp.49~ (2009), 日本文学協会
  7. 田山花袋, "筑摩現代文学大系6", pp.367~ (1907), 筑摩書房
  8. 山崎義光, "モダニズムの言説様式としての<座談会>-「新潮合評会」から「文藝春秋」の「座談会」へ", 国語と国文学, 83(12), pp.45~ (2006), 至文堂
  9. "新潮 38巻3号", pp.76~ (1923), 新潮社
  10. "新潮 38巻4号", pp.62~ (1923), 新潮社
  11. "문예지 위기의 시대" (2020)[URL]
  12. "동대문구 기록관"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)