日韓の学術論文の序論に見られる人称・非人称表現
Personal Pronouns Used in the Introductory Part of Japanese and Korean Academic Articles
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
論文を書く際、多くの論文作成者は自分が置かれている文化圈の習慣や環境に影響される。特に人称․非人称表現の場合、韓国と日本では一人称表現はなるべく使用せず、「本＋研究主体」のような非人称表現を用いるように指導しており、多くの研究者がそのように認識している。しかし、実際どのような表現が多く用いられるのか、その使用様相と傾向を明らかにした研究は非常に少ない。そこで、本研究では日本と韓国の論文、特に序論に用いられる人称․非人称表現の使用様相を明らかにすることを目的とする。 本研究の分析の結果、日本と韓国両方とも非人称、一人称、複数一人称の中で非人称表現、特に「本＋研究主体」が最も多く見られた。しかし、日本では「本＋研究主体」の中でも「本稿」が最も多く見られたのに対し、韓国の論文では「本研究」が多く用いられていた。また、韓国の論文は日本の論文に比べ、「この＋研究主体」の使用が顕著に多く、日本の論文は韓国の論文に比べて「我々」のような複数一人称の表現が多く使用されていた。こうした結果から日本の論文と韓国の論文に人称․非人称表現の使用様相が異なっていることが明らかにできた。このような結果は韓国語․日本語教育、特に作文教育の基礎資料となることが期待される。
Abstract
When writing an article, many writers are influenced by the customs and environment of the cultural circle in which they are placed. In particular, in the case of personal and impersonal expressions, Korean and Japanese researchers are instructed to use impersonal expressions such as “本 (hon ‘This’) + research subject” rather than the first person as much as possible, and many researchers are aware of this. However, there have been very few studies that have clarified what kind of expressions are actually used as well as their usage patterns and trends. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to clarify the aspects of the use of personal and impersonal expressions in Japanese and Korean articles, especially in their introductory part. The analysis of this study revealed that impersonal expressions, especially “本 (Hon) + research subject,” were the most common among impersonal, first-person, and plural first-person expressions in both Japan and Korea. However, among “本 (Hon) + research subject” in Japan, “本稿 (Honko)” was the most common, whereas “本研究 (Honkenkyu)” was used more frequently in Korean papers. In addition, Korean articles used “この (Kono + research subject)” significantly more often than Japanese papers, and Japanese papers used more plural first-person expressions such as “我々 (Wareware)” than Korean papers. These results indicate that the use of personal and impersonal expressions differs between Japanese and Korean papers. These results are expected to serve as basic data for Korean and Japanese language education, especially in the teaching of composition.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김한샘, "학술적 글쓰기에서의 객관화 전략 사용 양상 연구 - 한국어 학습자와 한국어 모어 화자 간의 비교를 중심으로 -", 비교문화연구, 49, pp.95~126 (2017), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 박은선, "한국어 학위논문 서론의 장르분석적 연구", 한국어교육, 17(1), pp.191~210 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- 박나리, "학술논문의 텍스트성 분석 － 의도성(intentionality)을 중심으로 －", 텍스트언어학, 25(0), pp.163~192 (2008), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 신영주, "한국어 학위 논문 서론의 완화 표지 사용 양상 : 중국인 학습자를 대상으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2011
- 원보라, "서론의 구조 및 유형 체계화 연구", 한국초등국어교육, (58), pp.55~89 (2015), 한국초등국어교육학회[DOI]
- 유해준, "한국어 학술 논문 텍스트 표지 분석", 영주어문, 37, pp.311~326 (2017), 영주어문학회
- 이은숙, "텍스트 유형에 따른 인칭대명사 번역연구", 영어영문학연구, 54(3), pp.307~325 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 임정아, "한일 학술논문 서론의 텍스트 비교 분석", 석사, pp.2020
- 최은지, "외국인 유학생의 보고서 작문에서의 태도 표현 양상", 이중언어학, (40), pp.213~236 (2009), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 泉子, "談話分析の可能性–理論·方法·日本語の表現性", pp.57~82 (1997), くろしお出版
- 市川孝, "文末表現の様相", 計量国語学, (65), pp.1~8 (1973), 計量国語学会
- 임정아, "日本学術論文の序論に見られる文末表現 - 意味機能の観点から -", 일본어문학, (96), pp.127~146 (2022), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 日本語文法学会, "日本語文法事典", pp.470~ (2014), 大修館書店
- 浜田麻里他, "大学生と留学生のための論文ワークブック", pp.5~9 (2014), くろしお出版
- 槙川敬子, "英語学術論文における一人称代名詞‘I'の使用", 中国地区英語教育学会研究紀要, (43), pp.31~40 (2013), 中国地区英語教育学会
- Biber, D., "Spoken and written textual dimensions in English : Resolving the contradictory findings", Language, 62, pp.384~414 (1986), Linguistic Society of America
- Ivanic, R., "Who’s who in Academic Writing?", pp.140~173 (1992), Longman
- Kuo, C. H., "The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles", nglish for Specific Purposes, 18, pp.121~138 (1999), Elsevier
- Kussmaul Paul, "Text-type conventions and translating: Some methodological issues", pp.67~83 (1997), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Lee Sun, "An Contrastive Rhetoric Study of Korean and English Research Paper Introductions", 박사, pp.2001
- Mauranen Anna, "Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric : A Textlinguistic Study", pp.3~22 (1993), Peter Lang Verlag
- Rowley-Jolivet, E., "Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy : Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting", English for Specific Purposes, 24, pp.41~64 (2005), Elsevier
- Swales, "Genre Analysis : English in Academic and Research Setting", pp.328~ (1990), Cambridge University Press