과연 결속(Binding)은 성분통어(C-Command) 없이 가능한가?
Is Binding Possible without C-commanding?
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is well-known that binding is possible only when the c-command requirement is satisfied: A binds B iff (i) A c-commands B and (ii) A and B are co-indexed. Hornstein (2009), however, proposes that anaphor binding is a product of movement and sideward movement creates a binding relation without c-commanding. However, this paper points out some empirical inadequacies of the proposal and provides an alternative account for the cases in which A appears not to c-command B but A can bind B. This alternative approach is based on the principle that there is a correspondence between thematic hierarchy and syntactic configuration.
Abstract
It is well-known that binding is possible only when the c-command requirement is satisfied: A binds B iff (i) A c-commands B and (ii) A and B are co-indexed. Hornstein (2009), however, proposes that anaphor binding is a product of movement and sideward movement creates a binding relation without c-commanding. However, this paper points out some empirical inadequacies of the proposal and provides an alternative account for the cases in which A appears not to c-command B but A can bind B. This alternative approach is based on the principle that there is a correspondence between thematic hierarchy and syntactic configuration.
참고문헌 (26)
- Baker,M, "Incorporation" (1988), Chicago University Press
- Belletti,A, "The case of unaccusatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.1~34 (1988)
- Belletti, A, "Psych-verbs and theta theory", Natural language and linguistic theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
- Chomsky,N, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chomsky, N, "On phases", MIT, ~ (2005)
- Dowty,D, "On the semantic content of the notion of 'thematic role'. In Properties, types and meaning, vol 2" (1989), Kluwer
- Fox, D, "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure", Theoretical linguistics, 31, pp.1~45 (2005)
- Hornstein,N, "Logical form:from GB to minimalism" (1995), Blackwell
- Hornstein,N, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein,N, "Move!:A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Hornstein,N, "A theory of syntax: minimal operations and universal grammar" (2009), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Hornstein, N, "PRO Gate and movement", Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Penn Linguistics (2003)
- Hornstein, N, "Psych verbs, theta roles and reconstruction. in Reconstruction and derivation in the theory of syntax" (2003), Hankook Publishing Co.
- Kayne,R.S, "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kayne,R.S, "Pronouns and their antecedents. in Derivation and explanation and optimal derivations" (2002), MIT Press
- Koizumi,M, "Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.99~148 (1993)
- Lasnik,H, "Chains of arguments. In Working minimalism" (1999), MIT Press
- Lebeaux,D, "Language acquisition and the form of the grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- Leabeaux, D, "Where does the binding theory apply", Univ. of Maryland, College Park, ~
- May, R, "Logical form: its structure and derivation", MIT Press
- Nunes,J, "Linearization of chains and sideward movement" (2004), MIT Press
- Pesetsky,D, "Zero syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Rizzi,L, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Rizzi, L, "The fine structure of the left periphery. in Elements of Grammar", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Williams,E, "Thematic structure in syntax" (1994), MIT Press