후행결속(Backward Binding)과 비명시 논항(Implicit Argument)
Backward Binding and Implicit Argument
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concerned with how to account for the backward binding phenomena in psych-predicates. The backward binding can be structurally explained if we make the following two assumptions: first, the bindee is generated in the c-domain of the binder and second, the bindee moves across the binder. Unfortunately, however, the two assumptions contradict each other, since the bindee cannot cross over the binder in accordance with the Minimal Link Condition (MLC). The upshot of the problem is that interleaving movement is required in order to structurally account for the backward binding, but it is not permitted by the MLC. In this paper I claim that the interleaving movement approach is not a viable option since it does not conform to the MLC, claiming that the backward binding takes place on account of the implicit argument via λ-conversion. That is, this paper provides a semantic account for the backward binding in psych-predicates, after pointing out that the interleaving movement approach is on the wrong tract.
Abstract
This paper is concerned with how to account for the backward binding phenomena in psych-predicates. The backward binding can be structurally explained if we make the following two assumptions: first, the bindee is generated in the c-domain of the binder and second, the bindee moves across the binder. Unfortunately, however, the two assumptions contradict each other, since the bindee cannot cross over the binder in accordance with the Minimal Link Condition (MLC). The upshot of the problem is that interleaving movement is required in order to structurally account for the backward binding, but it is not permitted by the MLC. In this paper I claim that the interleaving movement approach is not a viable option since it does not conform to the MLC, claiming that the backward binding takes place on account of the implicit argument via λ-conversion. That is, this paper provides a semantic account for the backward binding in psych-predicates, after pointing out that the interleaving movement approach is on the wrong tract.
참고문헌 (20)
- Belleti,A, "Psych-verbs and theta-theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist program." (1995), Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed) Ken Hale: a Life in Language", Cambridge, Mass MIT, 1~52 (2001)
- Chomsky, N, "Three factors in the design of language", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chomsky, N, "On phases. ms", MIT, ~ (2005)
- Fillmore, C. J, "The case for case. In E. Bach and R. T Harms (eds.) Universal in Linguistic Theory", New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, ~ (1968)
- Hornstein,N, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein,N, "Psych verbs,theta roles and reconstruction.In Hornstein et.al(eds.)Reconstruction and derivation in the theory of syntax.", Seoul:Hankook Publishing Co, ~ (2003)
- Koizumi,M, "Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.99~148 (1993)
- Larson,R, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Lasnik,H, "Chains of arguments. In Samuel Epstein and Norbert Hornstein (eds.)", Working minimalism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 189~215 (1999)
- Nunes,Jairo, "Cyclicity and Extraction Domains.", Syntax, 3, pp.20~43 (2000)
- Postal,Paul, "On Raising", Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press,, ~ (1974)
- Pesetsky,David, "Phrasal Movement and Its Kin", Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ~ (2000)
- Rizzi,Luigu, "Relativized Minimality", Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ~ (1990)
- Ross,John Robert, "Constraints on Variables", Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ~ (1967)
- Pesetsky, D, "Zero syntax", Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ~ (1995)
- Rizzi, L, "The fine structure of the left periphery. in L. Haegeman (ed.)", Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 281~337 (1997)
- Uriakereka,Juan, "Multiple Spell-out. in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.)", Working Minimalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 251~282 (1999)
- Williams,E, "Thematic structure in syntax" (1994), Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press