名而動구문의 화용 의미 분석
Pragmatic Meaning of the structure of the Noun+er(而)+Verb
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the pragmatic meaning of the structure of ‘noun- er(而)-verb’. In this structure, nouns and verbs have the relationship of topic and comment, in which er(而) performs the role of scalar focus particle behind the topic. Nouns in front of the er(而) acts as the extreme value of scalar, which is comprehensive. The structure of ‘noun-er(而)-verb’ can appear in both realistic and non-realistic situations, and has the meaning of concession with the negation of expectation. In other words, since the attributes of the noun component are not consistent with what the speaker expects, twist, contrast, and emphasis are derived. The structure of ‘noun-er(而)-verb’ is the product of subjectification, which reflects the speaker’s evaluation or emotion in a certain situation. Subjectification is connected to the subjectivity in the form of language, while subjectivity is also related to the the attribute of the noun component in front of er(而). The higher the level of sentience in the noun in front of conjunction (而) gets, the higher speaker’s empathy is, compared to the inanimate noun, when human-related animate noun appears. This makes speaker’s evaluation or judgment more distinct than the delivery of objective facts.
Abstract
This study analyzed the pragmatic meaning of the structure of ‘noun- er(而)-verb’. In this structure, nouns and verbs have the relationship of topic and comment, in which er(而) performs the role of scalar focus particle behind the topic. Nouns in front of the er(而) acts as the extreme value of scalar, which is comprehensive. The structure of ‘noun-er(而)-verb’ can appear in both realistic and non-realistic situations, and has the meaning of concession with the negation of expectation. In other words, since the attributes of the noun component are not consistent with what the speaker expects, twist, contrast, and emphasis are derived. The structure of ‘noun-er(而)-verb’ is the product of subjectification, which reflects the speaker’s evaluation or emotion in a certain situation. Subjectification is connected to the subjectivity in the form of language, while subjectivity is also related to the the attribute of the noun component in front of er(而). The higher the level of sentience in the noun in front of conjunction (而) gets, the higher speaker’s empathy is, compared to the inanimate noun, when human-related animate noun appears. This makes speaker’s evaluation or judgment more distinct than the delivery of objective facts.
참고문헌 (29)
- 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 國語學, (73), pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 사례, "중국어의 '대조 화제'와 '대조 초점'에 대한 재고-용어 사용 양상을 출발점으로-", 중국언어연구, (85), pp.127~150 (2019), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
- 안기섭, "고대한어 ‘而’의 連詞性에 대한 의문-先秦․兩漢 시기를 중심으로-", 중국인문과학, (51), pp.43~68 (2012), 중국인문학회
- 예선희, "척도초점사 even의 문법화에 대하여-주관화, 상호주관화, 서법성을 중심으로", 현대영어영문학, 54(4), pp.157~172 (2010), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 윤병달, "영어에 있어서 의미의 주관성과 통사적 표면형", 언어연구, 9 (1993)
- 이순욱, "한국어 양보의 표현 방책과 의미", 석사, pp.2017
- 蔡英杰, "古漢語“名而動”結構的再認識", 古漢語研究, (3) (2019)
- 陳寶勤, "先秦連詞“而”語法語義考察", 古漢語研究, (1) (1994)
- 董蓮池, "假設分句主謂之間“而”字新探", 古漢語研究, (2) (1990)
- 方有國, "古漢語主謂間“而”字研究", 西南師範大學學報, (4) (2002)
- 傅書靈, "關於古漢語“名而動”的一點思考", 中國語文, (5) (2010)
- 何樂士, "左傳虛詞研究" (1999), 商務印書館
- 金立鑫, "什麼是語言類型學" (2011), 上海外語教育出版社
- 최재영, "언어유형론이란 무엇인가" (2015), 한국문화사
- 藍英, "從少數民族語言看“而”的虛化演變", 古漢語研究, (1) (1990)
- 劉景農, "漢語文言語法" (1998), 中華書局
- 馬建忠, "馬氏文通" (2008), 商務印書館
- 梅廣, "上古漢語語法綱要" (2018), 上海敎育出版社
- 沈家煊, "漢語主觀性與主觀化研究", 外國教學與研究, (4) (2001)
- 沈家煊, "從“流水句”的性質看先秦“名而動”結構", 語言教學與研究, (6) (2016)
- 宋洪民, "也談“名而動”結構", 中國語文, (2) (2009)
- 薛鳳生, "試論連詞“而”的語義與語法功能", 語言研究, (1) (1991)
- 徐烈炯, "話題的結構與功能" (2003), 上海教育出版社
- 楊伯峻, "古漢語虛詞" (1981), 中華書局
- 楊萌萌, "上古漢語“主之謂”及“主而謂”結構的句法", IACL발표논문집 (2018)
- 楊榮祥, "論“名而動”結構的來源及其語法性質", 中國語文, (3) (2008)
- 袁毓林, "漢語主觀性與主觀化研究" (2011), 商務印書館
- Hopper, Paul J., "문법화" (1999), 한신문화사
- Li, "표준중국어문법" (2011), 한울아카데미