소량 의미 양사의 주관화 표지 기능 연구: ‘点’과 ‘丝’를 중심으로
A study on the subjectification marker function of quantifiers meaning small amount: Focusing on ‘dian’ and ‘si’
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to explore the subjectification marker function of ‘yi dian’ and ‘yi si’ as quantifiers, which express a ‘subjective small amount' reflecting the language users' evaluation and feelings. A quantifier phrase of the form ‘yi+q+n’ means ‘a very small amount’ or ‘almost no amount’ in a negative sentence and represents ‘subjective amount.’ This paper particularly analyzed the use of ‘dian’ and ‘si,’ which have distinct small-quantity meanings in the quantifier itself, and the results showed that they have certain differences from other quantifiers. ‘Dian’ and ‘si’ are used in conjunction with the numeral ‘yi’ in most of the usages, and this form shows a dominant distribution in negative sentences with semantic negation of the entire quantity. This is considered to be due to their characteristic of being the lowest position in the quantitative hierarchy.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the subjectification marker function of ‘yi dian’ and ‘yi si’ as quantifiers, which express a ‘subjective small amount' reflecting the language users' evaluation and feelings. A quantifier phrase of the form ‘yi+q+n’ means ‘a very small amount’ or ‘almost no amount’ in a negative sentence and represents ‘subjective amount.’ This paper particularly analyzed the use of ‘dian’ and ‘si,’ which have distinct small-quantity meanings in the quantifier itself, and the results showed that they have certain differences from other quantifiers. ‘Dian’ and ‘si’ are used in conjunction with the numeral ‘yi’ in most of the usages, and this form shows a dominant distribution in negative sentences with semantic negation of the entire quantity. This is considered to be due to their characteristic of being the lowest position in the quantitative hierarchy.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이기동, "언어 주관성의 문제", 한글, 206, pp.177~208 (1989)
- 이선희, "현대중국어의 주관량(主？量) 대소전도현상과 어순변화", 중국언어연구, (17), pp.225~250 (2003), 한국중국언어학회
- 주기하, "‘就’의 주관량(主觀量) 표기(標記) 기능 연구", 중국어문학지, (48), pp.397~421 (2014), 중국어문학회
- 陈小荷, "主观量问题初探 : 兼谈副词"就", "才", "都"", 世界汉语教学, 30(4), pp.18~24 (1994)
- 戴耀晶, "汉语否定句的语义确定性", 世界汉语教学, 67(1), pp.20~27 (2004)
- 董秀芳, "主观性表达在汉语中的凸显性及其表现特征", 语言科学, 85(6), pp.561~570 (2016)
- 郭先珍, "现代汉语量词用法词典" (2002), 语文出版社
- 胡清国, ""一量(名)"否定格式对量词的选择与限制征", 汉语学报, 15(3), pp.30~34 (2006)
- 胡清国, ""一量名"否定格式的两种语序及其制约因素", 宁夏大学学报, 29(4), pp.16~19 (2007)
- 李善熙, "汉语“主观量”的表达研究", 博士, pp.2003
- 李宇明, "主观量的成因", 汉语学习, 101(5), pp.3~7 (1997)
- 李宇明, "数量词语与主观量", 华中师范大学学报, 38(6), pp.90~97 (1999)
- 李宇明, "汉语量范畴研究" (2000), 华中师范大学出版社
- 刘承峰, "现代汉语"全量否定"研究", 语言科学, 26(1), pp.27~39 (2007)
- 吕敏, "量词"丝""缕"的语法化及动因探析", 宁夏大学学报, 43(2), pp.51~57 (2021)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 马真, "修饰数量词的副词", 语言教学与研究, 1, pp.53~60 (1981)
- 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 沈家煊, "语言的"主观性"和"主观化"", 外语教学与研究, 33(4), pp.268~275 (2001)
- 施关淦, "语法研究和探索(四)" (1988), 商务印书馆
- 宋文辉, "词序与"量"否定的结果", 河北师范大学学报, 28(6), pp.73~80 (2005)
- 吴秀菊, "量词"点"的产生及其发展演变", 殷都学刊, 36(3), pp.86~89 (2015)
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆
- 周芍, "名词量词组合的双向选择研究及其认知解释量词", 博士, pp.2006
- Langacker, R. W., "Grammar and conceptualization" (1999), Walter de Gruyter